Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final -- Cancelled

2008-03-18 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have the rat-maven-plugin setup with excludes for most of those files. Doesn't seem to catch poms or files under src/test/ Here are the files that should be updated from your list. Working on it. Jacek --

Re: validation -- separate module?

2008-03-18 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
HI Karan... I know that commons validation was not originally made for EJB validation tasks, but from what I've read yesterday I think it can be changed to our needs, or at least we can take the idea being the validation tasks can be configured using XML files, at that point people can really

Re: MDB/Transaction Recovery

2008-03-18 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
So interesting, so they developed everything in Java Tx management ??? sounds strange ha ! On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There isn't much active development on it because the project is basically done. The project has a narrowly focused, write a

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final -- Cancelled

2008-03-18 Thread Kevan Miller
On Mar 17, 2008, at 7:18 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Another FWIW, I ran RAT against the current trunk/openejb3. Looks like a number of files need a bit of attention. We have the rat-maven-plugin setup with excludes for most of those

Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final -- Cancelled

2008-03-18 Thread Kevan Miller
On Mar 18, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Working on it. Done Cool. Thanks Jacek! --kevan

Re: MDB/Transaction Recovery

2008-03-18 Thread Kevan Miller
On Mar 16, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: After thinking about this more, I don't think that we should turn on recovery at this point in the 3.0 release cycle. I think it is good turning it on in trunk (3.1) so we can get lots of testing in before releasing it. IIYC, you're

Re: MDB/Transaction Recovery

2008-03-18 Thread Kevan Miller
On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: There isn't much active development on it because the project is basically done. The project has a narrowly focused, write a transaction logging system. The project was complete a few years ago and all known bugs have been fixed. So

How to make a contribution to the community

2008-03-18 Thread Ashish Jain
Hi All, I am interested in contributing to the community and there by learning more of EJB3. I am a newbie and I need help to start my contribution to the community. Thanks Ashish

Re: How to make a contribution to the community

2008-03-18 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested in contributing to the community and there by learning more of EJB3. I am a newbie and I need help to start my contribution to the community. Hi Ashish, There're a couple of ways to contribute that

Re: MDB/Transaction Recovery

2008-03-18 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Due to the way the specs are written the Connector system is really married to the transaction manager, so if you take one you have to take the other. I like the G connector system and don't want to learn another one, so I see no reason to switch. -dain On Mar 18, 2008, at 7:56 AM,

Re: MDB/Transaction Recovery

2008-03-18 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Mar 16, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: After thinking about this more, I don't think that we should turn on recovery at this point in the 3.0 release cycle. I think it is good turning it on in trunk (3.1) so we can get lots of