I think that it's a bad practice to automagically change the explicit behavior
of tests. If a test needs to explicitly state a fact about itself w/ an
explicit annotation to get it to pass then that's what it should do.
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 20, 2012, at 12:07 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I'm not getting any commit messages. Is anyone else getting any?
More specifically there are build failures and no corresponding emails to the
developers.
Regards,
Alan
we don't change the behavior of the test if it is not asked but if it is
asked we could be ready.
- Romain
2012/2/20 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
I think that it's a bad practice to automagically change the explicit
behavior of tests. If a test needs to explicitly state a fact about
i have issue with the svn itself so i guess the commit list too but i saw
your commits (last one about URLs).
- Romain
2012/2/20 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
I'm not getting any commit messages. Is anyone else getting any?
More specifically there are build failures and no
We've chatted occasionally on creating a scanning.xml file where people could
setup includes and excludes and, overall, optimize classpath scanning.
Romain is already busy hacking of course :) Here's the idea for a plugin to
effectively do the most expensive part of scanning in advance:
Neat idea.
I would include the configuration information in the scan.xml so that tooling
would know the criteria used in the scan and decide whether or not to scan for
other annotations or inplementations.
I would also put the scan.xml file in some package specific place like
Was going to try and add everyone to the circle of the Apache TomEE Google+
page, but it appears that Google doesn't allow that until you are following the
Apache TomEE page.
So if you want to be listed in the Team Members circle, you need to first add
Apache TomEE to your circles:
Done... I hope so... sometimes Google+ seems to be not so intuitive...
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:47 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Was going to try and add everyone to the circle of the Apache TomEE Google+
page, but it appears that Google doesn't allow that until you are
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
Neat idea.
I would include the configuration information in the scan.xml so that
tooling would know the criteria used in the scan and decide whether or not
to scan for other annotations or inplementations.
I would
I have one concern, still by having an XML generated and we still like
reading only information about such classes and the overhead of reading XML
in memory in case we have a large one(s).
Why not generate a code out of that which is compiled with the jar or even
added to the an existing jar
10 matches
Mail list logo
