is a wrapped query that closes
itself after the query executes, even though it is executing in a jta
environment.
Should our wrapper only close the em if it is executed (rather than created)
outside a jta tx?
advice really appreciated :-)
thanks
david jencks
than when running just the
one test, in particular it wiped out the first session from the first request
before the second, causing the scoped object to get lost. I couldn't figure
out why the session creation behavior was different in the two situations.
hope you have better luck
david
they actually will be in the
same classloader. For non-osgi environments repackaging the api jar in the
openejb api jar should be ok. It does mean the openejb api jar is not really
usable in osgi with a javafaces implementation, but I don't consider that a big
problem.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 28
+1
it built for me with maven 3 no idea why :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 22, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included
a really nice
build :-)
congratulations everyone.
david jencks
On Oct 2, 2011, at 6:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
NOTE TO EVERYONE
I know re-rolling can be very time consuming and often
people vote on the first release attempt and never vote
again. We want a strong turnout for this vote
profile
in the release plugin arguments. (If you do this you should be able to do your
${arguments} trick in the openejb top level pom and use the normal apache 10
pom as well)
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems we have some oddness in the source
out how to save these generated classes would be
better though, IIRC when I looked at this the types jaxb likes would be very
inconvenient for humans.
thanks
david jencks
--
Fredrik Jonson
, and
only released the modules I wanted.
grep was definitely my friend when working this out.
hope this helps
david jencks
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
Yes, but all these things should be done by release plugin, that makes me
feel confusion
2011/9/23 Jeff Genender
+1
Checked the contents, build, license.
finally :-)
david jencks
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Fixes:
- ensured source is not in the binaries
- removed whitespace from osgi package exports
- bundle activator that can handle activating many things
- removed
enough so I won't vote +1 at this time.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:06 PM, David Blevins wrote:
One more try with the license and contents issues fixed.
The staging repo binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-041/org/apache/openejb
I'm not sure what you do want to build. maybe something like
mvn clean install -pl assembly/openejb-tomcat/openejb-tomcat-bundle -am
would work that would build the listed project and everything needed for it.
The profile sounds like a better bet to me.
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 7
out.writeObject(ser)
rather than using
out.writeObject(ser)
for all of them. Is this to save a little bit of overhead writing the class
definition etc?
thanks
david jencks
We could probably use this for a number of things.
-David
On Jun 26, 2011, at 12:37 PM, David Jencks (JIRA) wrote
including them in svn and
source makes what's going on clear and is much simpler.
If the Jaxb code is in OpenEJB, then OpenEJB would seem like the natural
location. Where ever the JaxbJavaee code is, I think the schema's belong
there, also...
that's openejb.
thanks
david jencks
2
to
move the connector support in this direction. A lot of the changes are to make
it more osgi friendly, but AFAIK this does not restrict its use outside osgi.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi All,
I've been working on providing support
and
integrate with it.
david jencks
We could do some amazing stuff with a more direct and tight integration with
Jetty. I don't know that I have the mental bandwidth to move that forward at
the moment.
I'd definitely love to see some more work on the Arquillian side of things,
I think
We need to figure out where the WebBeansContext is supposed to get created
because in the osgi work it needs to get initialized in its constructor in
order to work.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
To continue other works before this is completely fixed, I
dunno anything about netbeans, but IDEA consumes maven based projects pretty
much natively and eclipse + m2e does too. I'd say the maven idea plugin is
obsolete for anything except removing idea project files.
david jencks
On May 29, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Exactly my thought
No harm in asking :-)
I don't use eclipse, and I build using the command line mvn. I think there's
some kind of IDEA maven integration I could try but I never have
Is the run maven from eclipse part of m2e?
david jencks
On May 27, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Hao Lieu wrote:
Hi,
probably
+1
david jencks
On May 22, 2011, at 5:58 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
+1
david jencks
On May 22, 2011, at 6:01 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
You might try building the appropriate geronimo tm locally. I think there were
some related changes recently and maybe this component didn't get pushed
properly?
david jencks
On May 8, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi folks!
I have not compiled openejb for a looong time
openejb uses the geronimo transaction manager, which does not depend on any
other geronimo pieces. For instance, Aries does too.
david jencks
On May 8, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
humm, so this is depending on a geronimo part?
What parts will get packaged in tomee
yes
david jencks
On May 8, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
kk, but hmm isn't this umm pretty dirty?
I mean, openejb is depending on geronimo and geronimo is depending on
openejb? Sounds broken from the first glance... Is this a separately released
subproject in geronimo at least
manifest
generation rather than bundle packaging.
thanks
david jencks
to start
with the TransactionRolledBackLocalException and convert it to
TransactionRolledBackException if necessary, but I don't think this is really
needed just to get it to work.
thanks!
david jencks
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi David,
Discussed that point
of causes. The code above only tracks the first cause. I'm
really not sure what to think about this and would appreciate comments.
Thoughts?
thanks
david jencks
p.s. we includes Ashish Jain and David Blevins and possibly others we
finally got moving on this due to a customer complaint. Better
the jcdi tck you need a fancier command line like
cd jcdi-tck-runner
mvn clean test -Dgeronimo-assembly -Dincontainer -DassemblyId=tomcat7-javaee6
-Dcurrent
hope this helps
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 10, 2011, at 12:05 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi David,
It works under Tomcat because
);
return null;
}
}
}
}
}
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 31, 2010, at 10:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 31, 2010, at 5:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Oct 30, 2010, at 11:41 PM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: djencks
Date: Sun Oct 31 06:41:46 2010
New Revision: 1029263
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1029263view=rev
didn't see the openejb code that looks at beans.xml. Does openejb need to know
what's in beans.xml other than what owb needs?
thanks
david jencks
-David
(no matter what the
constructor is like).
thanks
david jencks
I'm going to follow a little more my investigations ...
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-OpenWebBeans-CDI-with-Junit-tp3000191p3007426.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive
consumed its an int. (jetty uses seconds, and an int). The
time unit is minutes, so I don't think even a short would be maxed out by any
meaningfully usable value. Do you think a larger than int-max value makes any
sense?
thanks
david jencks
-David
a comment
from kohsuke that I think indicates trimming shouldn't happen for strings.
http://forums.java.net/jive/message.jspa?messageID=132369
anyone know more??
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Ivan wrote:
Agree to have a trim adapter, actually, most fields should be trimmed
is an env-entry value.
whitespace is a legal value here.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 26, 2010, at 8:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:18 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I have some slight evidence that setMessageDrivenContext isn't getting
called on an mdb. I think I recall some refactoring around such methods so
they get treated like regular
I have some slight evidence that setMessageDrivenContext isn't getting called
on an mdb. I think I recall some refactoring around such methods so they get
treated like regular injections. Is it possible that this method got left out
of that refactoring?
thanks
david jencks
up geronimo for hudson/hudson
for geronimo after you've learned how to do it?
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:50 PM, dsh wrote:
Okay so I'll do the research as soon as I have some spare cycles.
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:35 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
I've run into this sometimes on trunk. Then sometimes it stops being a
problem. Then it comes back. No pattern I can discern.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Running into this strange error and wondering if anyone has ever seen
anything like
+1
david jencks
On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Subject says it all :)
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
+1
david jencks
On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Subject says it all :)
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
welcome to vote.
Here's my +1
-David
of the implementation of
javax.ejb.embeddable.EJBContainer?
thanks
david jencks
.
If the preferEjb=true behavior would be more appropriate for openejb by itself,
let me know and I'll adjust the code appropriately.
many thanks
david jencks
Hi Jon,
So far this change seems to be working fine.
Looking forward to your eyes on the tck:-)
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi David,
I did suspect there would an issue with which classloader the proxy got
attached to at some point when I
Would anyone mind if I updated the poms to use the latest maven stuff like
apache 7 pom and eliminate some of the warnings from maven 3?
thanks
david jencks
jetty or tomcat; in
geronimo that's what we do.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 3, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
Hi David,
*
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:42 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Thiago
could come up with something that figures out how
to load most of the openejb classes and dependencies if only the provider is on
the classpath. I'd be tempted to use osgi but that might not be completely
appropriate for all scenarios.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 3, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Thiago
+1
david jencks
On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Per the More oversight discussion:
http://s.apache.org/uc0
Here's the vote for adding Jean-Louis Monteiro to the PMC so he can assist in
providing legal oversight for the project.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
+1
david jencks
On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Per the More oversight discussion:
http://s.apache.org/uc0
Here's the vote for adding Kevan Miller to the PMC so he can assist in
providing legal oversight for the project.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
.
The non-jaxb code is based on a draft schema. I updated the jaxb code to match
the final schema, with the exception of the TODO's you found, but I didn't
understand what the xml meant well enough to update the non-jaxb code. Maybe
you can figure it out :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Fri, Jul 23
I've seen this once or twice but it always passes the next time I try it.
I've seen a much stranger compiler error several times... something like a
ClassCastError
required: org.apache.openejb.config.rules.Key
supplied: org.apache.openejb.config.rules.Key
(this is from memory).
david jencks
I think that particular one's xml element/jee tree class got renamed to
ConcurrencyManagementType late in the spec. I don't know if it's being handled
in code yet...so this may be of no use :-\
david jencks
On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
What needs to be done with keys
I'm taking a look at implementing the ejb 3.1 jndi support for
global/app/module contexts and binding ejbs in at standard names. I think it
might go pretty quickly since I already implemented a lot of this over in
geronimo.
thanks
david jencks
david jencks
Daniel suggested to open the INFRA Jira against continuum. But before that,
I want to be sure that the latest VM is not already installed.
Can anyone give me rights to edit jobs?
Your opinion is also welcome.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb
On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 9:48 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hey guys,
Most of our CI build fail.
IMHO, it's not relevant to use a CI system if we never take build results
difficulties. BTW, what 1.0 ra.xml did you find?
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 6, 2010, at 2:43 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Mostly directed at David Jencks.
So if I had to upgrade a 1.0 ra.xml to a 1.5 or 1.6 ra.xml, what is required?
Is it possible to simply translate the xml to the newer style
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Openejb trunk now reads both 1.0 and 1/5/1.6 ra.xml's so I'm not sure why
you would need to upgrade.
However, if you do. you can upgrade the xml easily, it's basically
putting
On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:33 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Openejb trunk now reads both 1.0 and 1/5/1.6 ra.xml's so I'm not sure why
you would
Thanks! fixed in rev 958001
sorry
david jencks
On Jun 25, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
Hi, David.
I think you forgot to commit the HandlerChainMetaData.java file. I'm
having a compile exception here.
[exec]
C:\dev\ws_illumi3\openejb3\server\openejb-ejbd\src\main\java
correctly).
The second change says that if there's only one module and you don't know the
moduleId, then look in it.
thanks
david jencks
the actual
Finders.
thanks
david jencks
-David
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010, at 1:01 AM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: djencks
Date: Wed Jun 2 08:01:03 2010
New Revision: 950412
URL
on this
right now, maybe I should try writing the ICFB and we can see how hard it is to
get it to work.
david jencks
Was there a strong motivation to merge this back into 3.1.x?
No, was just trying to keep them in sync where possible.
Are we seeing failures due to this?
-David
On Jun 1, 2010, at 5:00 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 1, 2010, at 7:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Side note, IMO, not supporting it is a failure.
I agree, we would be working around a long-standing bug in geronimo 2.2. I
was really glad to fix it in trunk and then fix openejb
more on this subject?
thanks
david jencks
+1
david jencks
On May 10, 2010, at 2:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
This is long overdue, but better late than never :)
Jarek has been on the sidelines supporting the Geronimo integration for quite
some time. With the work going on in Geronimo 3.0 around OSGi and Java EE 6,
we're going
are exposed in
jmx and you add some more not backed by gbeans. However, this is something
we'll need to figure out.
thanks
david jencks
On May 10, 2010, at 7:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Still largely uneducated when it comes to what is a good ObjectName and very
much looking for feedback
to use
file.toURI().toURL() which will properly encode the spaces.
I attached a patch to OPENEJB-1252 to try to fix up all the file to URL
conversions but I haven't got a successful build yet.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 19, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 4, 2010, at 6:33 PM, djen
and grep I don't see any tests in openejb that this should work.
Anyone have an idea if this is a problem in openejb or something we broke in
the geronimo integration? Any ideas on how to fix it?
thanks
david jencks
/ + CMP_PERSISTENCE_CONTEXT_REF_NAME);
} catch (NamingException ignroed) {
}
This might be marginally slower but since we're about to go talk to a database
I don't think creating a couple extra jndi objects will be really noticeable.
Anyone have a problem with me committing this change?
thanks
david
+1
source jars build OK for me.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:25 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Applied Jon's assembly patch and merged in a little plugin config for having
the maven assembly plugin execute the tar/zip commands rather than me doing
it manually. No other changes
oops, missed a couple commits fixed rev 930982
david jencks
On Apr 5, 2010, at 4:17 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 1, 2010, at 10:34 AM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: djencks
Date: Thu Apr 1 15:34:10 2010
New Revision: 930005
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930005view
On Apr 1, 2010, at 4:11 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 29, 2010, at 5:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 29, 2010, at 3:59 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd be pretty uncomfortable with a whipped up source archive that wasn't
produced by the normal maven release procedure.
That's
as an ancestor you get this for free.
Since AFAICT this source bundle is missing from the vote I have to vote -1 on
what is out there now. I'd be pretty uncomfortable with a whipped up source
archive that wasn't produced by the normal maven release procedure.
thanks
david jencks
-David
with aries blueprint and jndi
integrations.
thanks
david jencks
Jean-Louis
Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi Jean...
Seems very interesting, I skimmed over the blog. But I am
wondering, can't we use this feature as it is in OpenEJB instead of
re-implementing it, and then we can
Why does the activemq 4 module use 4.1.1 rather than 4.1.2? From svn
log it looks like the activemq4 support is brand new but the one log
comment makes it look like maybe it isn't and this is really old code
that never got updated?
thanks
david jencks
whatever info you want onto the request, but I found it a
difficult programming model to understand.
What context information do you want to transmit?
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:15 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jack Cai greensi...@gmail.com
wrote
and friendly that the risks are
negligible.
clearing up whose votes count for pmc membership might be good
though :-)
thanks
david jencks
Do you have thoughts on how this will be handled as well as a good
clarification for OpenEJB's rules regarding voting, etc that seem to
move itself away
+1
david jencks
On Jul 10, 2009, at 6:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Per the Adding Jon to the PMC discussion:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openejb-dev/200907.mbox/%3cd3673749-367f-45e0-93b6-f74164bc5...@visi.com%3e
Here's the vote for adding Jonathan Gallimore to the PMC so he
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:06 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:08 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:35 PM, David
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:06 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:08 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
One last extra bit that we do is the inverse of the auto
subcontext adding is auto empty
.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 3, 2009, at 6:09 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I got annoyed that the global ejb bindings from openejb didn't show
up in the geronimo global jndi tree so thought I'd try to fix it.
My first and possibly ill-advised strategy was to use the same flag
we use to decide what
/Deployment/foo in the
deployment tree (see line 123, Context context =
getContext(request);) , which failed in geronimo. I couldn't figure
out where the request contents were coming from and didn't see how to
duplicate the situation with ivm.
thanks
david jencks
-David
On Jul 6, 2009
only enables people as requested (or even if all geronimo
committers got permission).
david jencks
On Jun 12, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting 401 upon publishing the latest binaries (mvn deploy). How
can I work it out? It's needed if the newest example
david jencks
On May 27, 2009, at 7:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On May 19, 2009, at 4:54 PM, David Blevins wrote:
There are two pom.xmls involved; the one that creates the shaded
module and the one that results from the shaded module. When the
shading is being done as part of the build
+1
david jencks
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All license headers should be fixed. Here is the new staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging-4f18d08ad21886
The new tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.1
if its an svn
bug
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:15 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Running into issues here. Hopefully one of the maven guys can help
tomorrow.
The release:prepare phase keeps failing with:
[INFO] Unable to tag SCM
Provider message:
The svn tag command failed
+1
Note also that they're willing to do all the conversion work for us
such as patching poms.
david jencks
On Feb 11, 2009, at 8:27 AM, David Blevins wrote:
There's an interesting bit of new infrastructure going in that will
help with doing releases. This JIRA has all the details
${pom.version} doesn't cause problems.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 15, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
${version} properties break the release plugin, and most likely
other plugins.
-dain
On Nov 15, 2008, at 7:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:58 PM, David Jencks
I didn't look hard enough... only the root pom is being built with the
3.1.1-SNAPSHOT version. Working on a fix.
david jencks
On Nov 14, 2008, at 11:07 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I just started this. should be done in a few minutes
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Joe
.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 14, 2008, at 11:58 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I didn't look hard enough... only the root pom is being built with
the 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT version. Working on a fix.
david jencks
On Nov 14, 2008, at 11:07 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I just started this. should be done
element... true means timestamps
thanks
david jencks
Thanks,
Aaron
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just a friendly nudge :-)
I noticed that OpenEJB trunk is still using 3.1-SNAPSHOT as the
version even
though 3.1 was released a few weeks back
I applied the patch, rev 713924. Thanks for identifying the problem
and sorry for breaking stuff
david jencks
On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hey,
In Geronimo we started seeing the following exception (tons of them)
when running some tests with ejbs
.
I would expect it to be a lot faster to migrate data than a
transaction, but I'm having trouble thinking of how this situation
could arise. What if there's a transaction started where the data
is? When can this happen?
thanks
david jencks
Is there a way to migrate the session
I don't know anything about the context of this discussion. if you
are planning to run a jsf container in tomcat + openejb I'd use
myfaces since the injection support is quite xbean-reflect compatible.
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 11, 2008, at 1:23 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 10
+1
david jencks
On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Alright, vote time :)
Our dear Mr. Gallimore has done a fantastic job on the tooling to
turn ejb 2.x apps into 3.0 apps which turned quickly into a pretty
cool Eclipse plugin. Above that Jonathan has proven himself
+1
david jencks
On Apr 10, 2008, at 3:26 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries
. If there is such code let me know what it is and I'll try to
help figure out what else might be needed.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 15, 2008, at 2:37 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 15, 2008, at 12:06 AM, David Jencks wrote:
While not ideal, I think using a working although slower transport
is a reasonable compromise to a faster, broken transport until we
can get a fixed activemq out.
We definitely need
to be considerably more complicated.
thanks
david jencks
the geronimo transaction manager depends on this. I
think the problems in the linked amq defect may not be present when
using a non-vm amq transport which may be the primary amq use case.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:57 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Definitely keep looking for issues
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
