o that the findBars query is a wrapped query that closes
itself after the query executes, even though it is executing in a jta
environment.
Should our wrapper only close the em if it is executed (rather than created)
outside a jta tx?
advice really appreciated :-)
thanks
david jencks
group than when running just the
one test, in particular it wiped out the first session from the first request
before the second, causing the scoped object to get lost. I couldn't figure
out why the session creation behavior was different in the two situations.
hope you have better luck
actually will be in the
same classloader. For non-osgi environments repackaging the api jar in the
openejb api jar should be ok. It does mean the openejb api jar is not really
usable in osgi with a javafaces implementation, but I don't consider that a big
problem.
thanks
david jencks
On O
+1
it built for me with maven 3 no idea why :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 22, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
>Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
> incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
>Comparing with the last version, only two J
e final result includes a really nice
build :-)
congratulations everyone.
david jencks
On Oct 2, 2011, at 6:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> NOTE TO EVERYONE
>
> I know re-rolling can be very time consuming and often
> people vote on the first release attempt and never vote
> a
the all-subprojects profile
in the release plugin arguments. (If you do this you should be able to do your
${arguments} trick in the openejb top level pom and use the normal apache 10
pom as well)
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Seems we have som
axb would create fewer of these. I
think david's idea of figuring out how to save these generated classes would be
better though, IIRC when I looked at this the types jaxb likes would be very
inconvenient for humans.
thanks
david jencks
>
> --
> Fredrik Jonson
>
the module versions, and
only released the modules I wanted.
grep was definitely my friend when working this out.
hope this helps
david jencks
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Yes, but all these things should be done by release plugin, that makes me
> feel confusion ..
+1
Checked the contents, build, license.
finally :-)
david jencks
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Fixes:
> - ensured source is not in the binaries
> - removed whitespace from osgi package exports
> - bundle activator that can handle activating many things
he
problems above are serious enough so I won't vote +1 at this time.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:06 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> One more try with the license and contents issues fixed.
>
> The staging repo & binaries:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/conten
IMO these jars should be generated using the maven-bundle-plugin not the shade
plugin since there's some chance of ending up with more correct package
versions. IIRC the problem when I tried this was that I didn't mark all the
maven dependencies provided.
david jencks
On Jul 26, 2
I'm not sure what you do want to build. maybe something like
mvn clean install -pl assembly/openejb-tomcat/openejb-tomcat-bundle -am
would work that would build the listed project and everything needed for it.
The profile sounds like a better bet to me.
thanks
david jencks
On
lizable ones
out.writeObject(ser)
rather than using
out.writeObject(ser)
for all of them. Is this to save a little bit of overhead writing the class
definition etc?
thanks
david jencks
>
> We could probably use this for a number of things.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2
gt; location. Where ever the JaxbJavaee code is, I think the schema's belong
> there, also...
that's openejb.
thanks
david jencks
>
>> 2. Is there any legal problem we distribute Geronimo server with these xsd
>> files packaged in?
>
> No, there isn'
hoping to
move the connector support in this direction. A lot of the changes are to make
it more osgi friendly, but AFAIK this does not restrict its use outside osgi.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been working
lines of code to start a
jetty server. A lot easier that trying to run the jetty xml deployer and
integrate with it.
david jencks
>
> We could do some amazing stuff with a more direct and tight integration with
> Jetty. I don't know that I have the mental bandwidth to move t
We need to figure out where the WebBeansContext is supposed to get created
because in the osgi work it needs to get initialized in its constructor in
order to work.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> To continue other works before this is completely fi
dunno anything about netbeans, but IDEA consumes maven based projects pretty
much natively and eclipse + m2e does too. I'd say the maven idea plugin is
obsolete for anything except removing idea project files.
david jencks
On May 29, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
> Exactly my
No harm in asking :-)
I don't use eclipse, and I build using the command line mvn. I think there's
some kind of IDEA maven integration I could try but I never have
Is the "run maven from eclipse" part of m2e?
david jencks
On May 27, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Hao Lieu wrote:
+1
david jencks
On May 22, 2011, at 6:01 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
> welcome to vote.
>
> Here's my +1
>
>
> -David
>
+1
david jencks
On May 22, 2011, at 5:58 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
> welcome to vote.
>
> Here's my +1
>
>
> -David
yes
david jencks
On May 8, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> kk, but hmm isn't this umm pretty dirty?
>
> I mean, openejb is depending on geronimo and geronimo is depending on
> openejb? Sounds broken from the first glance... Is this a separately released
> subpr
openejb uses the geronimo transaction manager, which does not depend on any
other geronimo pieces. For instance, Aries does too.
david jencks
On May 8, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> humm, so this is depending on a geronimo part?
>
> What parts will get packaged in to
You might try building the appropriate geronimo tm locally. I think there were
some related changes recently and maybe this component didn't get pushed
properly?
david jencks
On May 8, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I have not compiled openejb for a lo
h bnd manifest
generation rather than bundle packaging.
thanks
david jencks
"start
with" the TransactionRolledBackLocalException and convert it to
TransactionRolledBackException if necessary, but I don't think this is really
needed just to get it to work.
thanks!
david jencks
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> Hi David,
>
&
rollback only or if we should keep
track of a list of causes. The code above only tracks the first cause. I'm
really not sure what to think about this and would appreciate comments.
Thoughts?
thanks
david jencks
p.s. "we" includes Ashish Jain and David Blevins and possibly
jcdi tck you need a fancier command line like
cd jcdi-tck-runner
mvn clean test -Dgeronimo-assembly -Dincontainer -DassemblyId=tomcat7-javaee6
-Dcurrent
hope this helps
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 10, 2011, at 12:05 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> It works
Name() + "/" + injection.getName(), e2);
return null;
}
}
}
}
}
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 31, 2010, at 10:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2010, at 5:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2010, at 11:41 PM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> Author: djencks
>>> Date: Sun Oct 31 06:41:46 2010
>>> New
Ideally we would just fix that.
Nothing was marking the decorators mentioned in beans.xml as enabled in owb. I
didn't see the openejb code that looks at beans.xml. Does openejb need to know
what's in beans.xml other than what owb needs?
thanks
david jencks
>
>
> -David
>
ScannerService openejb is using with OWB, but the
OWB scanners certainly do their best to find every class (no matter what the
constructor is like).
thanks
david jencks
>
> I'm going to follow a little more my investigations ...
> --
> View this message in context:
> http:/
ation and found a comment
from kohsuke that I think indicates trimming shouldn't happen for strings.
http://forums.java.net/jive/message.jspa?messageID=132369
anyone know more??
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Agree to have a trim adapter, actually
r value) {
>>this.sessionTimeout = value;
>>}
>
> I wonder if maybe Long isn't the right type?
By the time it gets consumed its an int. (jetty uses seconds, and an int). The
time unit is minutes, so I don't think even a short would be maxed out by any
meaningfully usable value. Do you think a larger than int-max value makes any
sense?
thanks
david jencks
>
>
> -David
>
ld not be trimmed is an env-entry value.
whitespace is a legal value here.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 26, 2010, at 8:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:18 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I have some slight evidence that setMessageDrivenContext isn't getting
>> called on an mdb. I think I recall some refactoring around such methods so
>&g
I have some slight evidence that setMessageDrivenContext isn't getting called
on an mdb. I think I recall some refactoring around such methods so they get
treated like regular injections. Is it possible that this method got left out
of that refactoring?
thanks
david jencks
ou into setting up geronimo for hudson/hudson
for geronimo after you've learned how to do it?
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:50 PM, dsh wrote:
> Okay so I'll do the research as soon as I have some spare cycles.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, Sep 24
I've run into this sometimes on trunk. Then sometimes it stops being a
problem. Then it comes back. No pattern I can discern.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Running into this strange error and wondering if anyone has ever seen
> anyth
+1
david jencks
On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Subject says it all :)
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
> welcome to vote.
>
> Here's my +1
>
>
> -David
>
+1
david jencks
On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Subject says it all :)
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
> welcome to vote.
>
> Here's my +1
>
>
> -David
>
+1
david jencks
On Aug 22, 2010, at 5:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Subject says it all :)
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours (usually more). As always anyone is
> welcome to vote.
>
> Here's my +1
>
>
> -David
>
implementation of
javax.ejb.embeddable.EJBContainer?
thanks
david jencks
I'd prefer #2. Isn't this what we do in geronimo?
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't really find a reference to it in the EJB 3.1 spec, but I'm
> pretty sure EJB 3.1 needs to support the @Resource annotation f
otated ejbs.
If the preferEjb=true behavior would be more appropriate for openejb by itself,
let me know and I'll adjust the code appropriately.
many thanks
david jencks
Indeed, my problems were caused by not reading the instructions and using bad
syntax.
The v-m-p is really great :-D
thanks!
david jencks
On Aug 6, 2010, at 1:31 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Even the latest release works for me, e.g.
>
> $ *mvn -version*
> Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r
Would anyone mind if I updated the poms to use the latest maven stuff like
apache 7 pom and eliminate some of the warnings from maven 3?
thanks
david jencks
I need to try out a fix in the 3.0.x branch but it has version 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT
whereas 3.0.2 is already released. The versions-maven-plugin doesn't seem to
be able to work with the build. Does anyone know how to fix this?
thanks
david jencks
Hi Jon,
So far this change seems to be working fine.
Looking forward to your eyes on the tck:-)
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I did suspect there would an issue with which classloader the proxy got
> attached to at some
) unsafe.defineClass(proxyName, proxyBytes,
0, proxyBytes.length, clsToProxy.getClassLoader(),
clsToProxy.getProtectionDomain());
I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1321 to provide a
hook for any problems this may cause. I'd really appreciate some review and
informed
ng to/modifying jetty or tomcat; in
geronimo that's what we do.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 3, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
> Hi David,
> *
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
&g
s?
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 3, 2010, at 1:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 5:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I'm taking a look at implementing the ejb 3.1 jndi support for
>> global/app/module contexts and binding ejbs in at standard names. I
d to work. Maybe we could come up with something that figures out how
to load most of the openejb classes and dependencies if only the provider is on
the classpath. I'd be tempted to use osgi but that might not be completely
appropriate for all scenarios.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 3,
+1
david jencks
On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Per the "More oversight" discussion:
>
> http://s.apache.org/uc0
>
> Here's the vote for adding Kevan Miller to the PMC so he can assist in
> providing legal oversight for the project.
>
&
+1
david jencks
On Jul 30, 2010, at 4:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Per the "More oversight" discussion:
>
> http://s.apache.org/uc0
>
> Here's the vote for adding Jean-Louis Monteiro to the PMC so he can assist in
> providing legal oversight for the proje
the final schema, with the exception of the TODO's you found, but I didn't
understand what the xml meant well enough to update the non-jaxb code. Maybe
you can figure it out :-)
thanks
david jencks
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:19 P
I've seen this once or twice but it always passes the next time I try it.
I've seen a much stranger compiler error several times... something like a
ClassCastError
required: org.apache.openejb.config.rules.Key
supplied: org.apache.openejb.config.rules.Key
(this is from memory).
da
ding ejb refs in buildEjbRef
line 2375.
This validation stuff is great... I hadn't seen it before!!!
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 17, 2010, at 6:24 AM, kma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: kmalhi
> Date: Sat Jul 17 13:24:03 2010
> New Revision: 965072
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.
On Jul 21, 2010, at 1:08 AM, romain.manni-bucau wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Hazelcast needs a javax.resource.spi.ConnectionManager to create its
> ConnectionFactory.
> I don't know where i could get the good object in openEJB.
>
Is hazelcast packaged as a standard j2ca
I'm taking a look at implementing the ejb 3.1 jndi support for
global/app/module contexts and binding ejbs in at standard names. I think it
might go pretty quickly since I already implemented a lot of this over in
geronimo.
thanks
david jencks
I think that particular one's xml element/jee tree class got renamed to
ConcurrencyManagementType late in the spec. I don't know if it's being handled
in code yet...so this may be of no use :-\
david jencks
On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
> What needs to
On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 9:48 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Most of our CI build fail.
places where we need something more
advanced than the jvm, such as annotations 1.1.
thanks
david jencks
>
> Daniel suggested to open the INFRA Jira against continuum. But before that,
> I want to be sure that the latest VM is not already installed.
>
> Can anyone give me rights to
On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:33 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Openejb trunk now reads both 1.0 and 1/5/1.6 ra.xml's so I'm not sure why
>> you would need to upgrade.
>>
>> However, if you do. you
if you have any difficulties. BTW, what 1.0 ra.xml did you find?
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 6, 2010, at 2:43 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Mostly directed at David Jencks.
>
> So if I had to upgrade a 1.0 ra.xml to a 1.5 or 1.6 ra.xml, what is required?
> Is it possible to simply "trans
Thanks! fixed in rev 958001
sorry
david jencks
On Jun 25, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
> Hi, David.
> I think you forgot to commit the "HandlerChainMetaData.java" file. I'm
> having a compile exception here.
>
> [exec]
> C:\dev\ws_illumi3
rated comment showing the schema fragment. Sometimes these seem like a
nuisance to me but I decided that they are worth including to see how the
modified code relates to the schema type.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 2, 2010, at 1:01 AM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
&g
common AbstractFinder superclass. In Openejb all
the functionality is in the AbstractAnnotationDeployer class which is the same
as the old AnnotationDeployer except for abstracting out creating the actual
Finders.
thanks
david jencks
>
> -David
>
ec correctly).
The second change says that if there's only one module and you don't know the
moduleId, then look in it.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 1, 2010, at 5:00 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 7:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>> Side note, IMO, not supporting it is a failure.
>>
>> I agree, we would be working around a long-standing bug in geronimo 2.2. I
>> was really
need an InitialContextFactoryBuilder modeled on the
aries one, but using gbeans instead of osgi services. This would only take an
hour or two to write. However it may cause a fair amount of upheaval to get it
properly installed and configured. I don't have a lot of time to spend on this
rig
whereas IIUC David thinks maybe it should.
Anyone know any more on this subject?
thanks
david jencks
.
I'm not sure what will happen in geronimo when all the gbeans are exposed in
jmx and you add some more not backed by gbeans. However, this is something
we'll need to figure out.
thanks
david jencks
On May 10, 2010, at 7:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Still largely uneducated wh
+1
david jencks
On May 10, 2010, at 2:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> This is long overdue, but better late than never :)
>
> Jarek has been on the sidelines supporting the Geronimo integration for quite
> some time. With the work going on in Geronimo 3.0 around OSGi and Java EE
t;java:comp/env/" + CMP_PERSISTENCE_CONTEXT_REF_NAME);
} catch (NamingException ignroed) {
}
This might be marginally slower but since we're about to go talk to a database
I don't think creating a couple extra jndi objects will be really noticeable.
Anyone have a problem with me committ
oader.text(TextLoader.java:65)
... 70 more
Using find and grep I don't see any tests in openejb that this should work.
Anyone have an idea if this is a problem in openejb or something we broke in
the geronimo integration? Any ideas on how to fix it?
thanks
david jencks
;re supposed to use
file.toURI().toURL() which will properly encode the spaces.
I attached a patch to OPENEJB-1252 to try to fix up all the file to URL
conversions but I haven't got a successful build yet.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 19, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>
oops, missed a couple commits fixed rev 930982
david jencks
On Apr 5, 2010, at 4:17 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2010, at 10:34 AM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: djencks
>> Date: Thu Apr 1 15:34:10 2010
>> New Revision: 930005
>>
>
+1
source jars build OK for me.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:25 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Applied Jon's assembly patch and merged in a little plugin config for having
> the maven assembly plugin execute the tar/zip commands rather than me doing
> it manually. No
On Apr 1, 2010, at 4:11 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 5:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2010, at 3:59 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> I'd be pretty uncomfortable with a "whipped up" source archive th
free.
Since AFAICT this source bundle is missing from the vote I have to vote -1 on
what is out there now. I'd be pretty uncomfortable with a "whipped up" source
archive that wasn't produced by the normal maven release procedure.
thanks
david jencks
>
> -David
>
>
not sure about the injection part, but that should be pretty easy
to implement since osgi services are accessible through jndi). So I'd
concentrate on getting openejb to run in karaf with aries blueprint and jndi
integrations.
thanks
david jencks
>
>>
>> Jean-Louis
>&
Why does the activemq 4 module use 4.1.1 rather than 4.1.2? From svn
log it looks like the activemq4 support is brand new but the one log
comment makes it look like maybe it isn't and this is really old code
that never got updated?
thanks
david jencks
whatever info you want onto the request, but I found it a
difficult programming model to understand.
What context information do you want to transmit?
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:15 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jack Cai
wrote:
1. At the client
+1
david jencks
On Jul 10, 2009, at 6:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Per the "Adding Jon to the PMC" discussion:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openejb-dev/200907.mbox/%3cd3673749-367f-45e0-93b6-f74164bc5...@visi.com%3e
Here's the vote for adding Jonathan Gallimore t
n and friendly that the risks are
negligible.
clearing up whose votes count for pmc membership might be good
though :-)
thanks
david jencks
Do you have thoughts on how this will be handled as well as a good
clarification for OpenEJB's rules regarding voting, etc that seem to
move i
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:06 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:08 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:35 PM, David
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:06 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:08 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
One last "extra bit" that we do is the inverse of the "auto
subcontext a
want the bind and prune operations to operate on a context rather than
a simpler openejb specific object that only exposes the operations
that openejb actually uses.
thanks
david jencks
-David
oyment" and name
"openejb/Deployment/foo". Since the moduleId matched "openejb/
Deployment" the code tried to lookup "openejb/Deployment/foo" in the
deployment tree (see line 123, Context context =
getContext(request);) , which failed in geronimo. I couldn
openejb and makes the
geronimo integration simpler.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 3, 2009, at 6:09 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I got annoyed that the global ejb bindings from openejb didn't show
up in the geronimo global jndi tree so thought I'd try to fix it.
My first and possibly il
standard procedure or if
he only enables people as requested (or even if all geronimo
committers got permission).
david jencks
On Jun 12, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting 401 upon publishing the latest binaries (mvn deploy). How
can I work it out? It&
ta/README.txt seem a little weird:
--wxrx 1 david david 100 May 29 16:26 README.txt
thanks
david jencks
On May 28, 2009, at 7:58 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok. At long last the binaries are ready! All was rat scanned[1]
for missing headers; there were a few and all that needed them wer
ix it.
thanks
david jencks
On May 27, 2009, at 7:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On May 19, 2009, at 4:54 PM, David Blevins wrote:
There are two pom.xmls involved; the one that creates the shaded
module and the one that results from the shaded module. When the
"shading" is being
he tests I could identify as relating to tomcat passed. The
remote tests had this error:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot find client/tools/
DatabaseHome: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException /client/tools/
DatabaseHome does not exist in the system. Check that the app was
successfully deployed.
which appeared to relate somehow with hsqldb. I didn't investigate
this.
thanks
david jencks
+1
david jencks
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All license headers should be fixed. Here is the new staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging-4f18d08ad21886
The new tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.1/
The
er if its an svn
bug
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:15 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Running into issues here. Hopefully one of the maven guys can help
tomorrow.
The release:prepare phase keeps failing with:
[INFO] Unable to tag SCM
Provider message:
The svn tag command f
xbean-reflect has the object creation code and I believe xbean-finder
does annotation scraping. I'm not sure if there are methods to make
it easier to extract all the annotations from a particular class and
its superclasses or if this is easy enough to do by hand.
david jencks
On F
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
