Hello all,
I saw many clustering update in 3.1 branch. Geronimo is planing to do a
new 2.2.2 release and we want to bring these openejb clustering update
in. If there's no objections to do a new 3.1.5 release, I'd like
to volunteer to roll 3.1.5 out.
Any instructions/tips on how to do 3.1.x
Forward this to openejb community, there are 8 JCDI tck failures in
Geronimo after switching to the openejb 4 beta.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: 3.0 Web Profile Standalone - 3.0 Web Profile JCDI Runtest
/CDI%20TCK.html#
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 9, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Forward this to openejb community, there are 8 JCDI tck failures in
Geronimo after switching to the openejb 4 beta.
-- Forwarded message
+1
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
Can anyone take a look ? I will fix this if it's not fixed in my
tomorrow morning.
---
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
[org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.DependencyManager] : Could not
start
xbean is published. Please shout if there's any problem with that.
Jon
On Aug 27, 2011 2:13 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for volunteering ! Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is
connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT a must-have ?
can we use connector 3.1.1
a year on trunk with no release.
It's going to be rough.
Best case scenario, we get two releases out before October. Worst case
scenario, we wait too long to start and don't get any.
-David
On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Don't know if geronimo can wait until javaone. We
to push that at the same time as the everything
else as well.
I think we'd need xbean and geronimo connector publishing first.
I'm happy to volunteer to do the release work, if that's any help.
Jon
On Aug 26, 2011 7:15 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, let's start to do
Thank you for volunteering !Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is
connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT a must-have ?
can we use connector 3.1.1 for the openejb beta for now ?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:11 AM
Subject: Re
Geronimo is going to make a beta release.Let's discuss a openejb trunk
release again.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Would be excellent if we could get a beta ready before this presentation on
the 25th:
Forwarding a post in geornimo list from David.J:
--
You should be able to do this with built-in maven stuff, see
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/10/maven
Hi David,
Some of existing geornimo ejb samples that depend on auto local business
interface grouping stop to work after this commit.
*URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=989853view=rev
Log:
Removed automatic grouping of non-annotated interfaces as business local
interfaces -- if you want
geronimo tests
when I try and fix it.
Jon
On 2 Jul 2011 06:48, Shawn Jiang (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058985#comment-13058985]
Shawn Jiang
in but leave
the LocalBeanProxyGenerator change out. I'll try some Geronimo TCK tests
here this morning and see how that does.
Jon
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your quick response. Just reverted it with #1142169
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011
Hi Romain,
This revision blocked geronimo server from starting.
I commited a quick fix with r1137371.Please take a look to see if my fix
has any impact to you.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:15 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmannibucau
Date: Sat Jun 18 20:15:29 2011
New Revision:
check why it was not
working?
Is geronimo useing these API?
- Romain
2011/6/19 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
Hi Romain,
This revision blocked geronimo server from starting.
I commited a quick fix with r1137371.Please take a look to see if my
fix
has any impact to you
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:44 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
The format of the internal names bound into openejb/Deployment is
guaranteed to be unique. It's not pretty to look at obviously, but every
possible proxy will be bound there guaranteed. For binding into
I can't recreate this test error locally :
Running org.apache.openejb.meta.AsynchronousMetaTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.104
sec FAILURE!
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:29 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.session.stateful.remove.complement.Client#removeTwoRemoteHomehttps://phoebe.apache.org:9443/jobs/artifacts/185/2106688/3_0_Full_Profile_tomcat_Test_Results/com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.session.stateful.remove.complement/Client_removeTwoRemoteHome.html
this case failed
Sorry, I meant to send this mail to geronimo tck list.
Please ignore it and I'll continue the discussion on geronimo tck mailing
list.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.session.stateful.remove.complement.Client
This brought some ejb tx regressions on geronimo tck. I can't dig into it
because of my poor apache svn connection for now.
-- Forwarded message --
From: dblev...@apache.org
Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:45 AM
Subject: svn commit: r1131304 - in /openejb/trunk/openejb3/container:
Just tried two cases, one on appclient passed, a persistence case failed
with the same exception.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 7:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Checked in a potential fix. Build is still running, but fingers
= contexts.get();
if (context == null) {
contexts.set(new WebBeansContext());
return contexts.get();
}
return context;
}
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Just tried two cases, one on appclient passed, a persistence case
I found that in following case:
public interface LocalIF {
void doSomething();
}
public interface RemoteIF extends LocalIF {
}
@Stateless()
@Remote(RemoteIF.class)
@Local(LocalIF.class)
public class EJB implements LocalIF,RemoteIF {
public void doSomething() {
...
}
}
We are
at 5:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
did you try re-defining doSomething() in remoteif?
because the behavior you are describing is not weird for me. doSomething
belongs to LocalIf not RemoteIF.
- Romain
2011/6/2 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
I found that in following
Good suggestion, I added a patch to OPENEJB-1322. Could you take a look ?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:06 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 9:29 AM, genspr...@apache.org wrote:
1, add a isStandalone field for modules. when the module is part of a
ear, it's
Cool, I'm pushing bunch of fixes in my local git to svn now. : )
Thanks, David and everyone !
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:07 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Shawn, you're all hooked up! Try a commit :)
On May 25, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Welcome Shawn
ops, I'm looking into it.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder openejb-trunk-ubuntu
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-trunk-ubuntu/builds/678
Buildbot
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:46 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
The Logger class is maybe 10 years old. There maybe better ways to do
stuff now, but here's what it does...
On May 18, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
1, What's the benefit to use a customized logger
This is a new regression I found in openejb trunk. A private method of
EJB is defined in ejb-jar.xml as timeout method. It's legal from ejb 31
spec.18.2.5.3
A timeout callback method can have public, private, protected, or package
level access. A timeout callback method must not be
to setAccessible just before calling timeout method could
solve this.But I'm wondering if we need to differentiate methods with
different accessible status so that they won't be only one state method in
method context map of beanContext ?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr
public class SessionBean implements RemoteBean, Session, TimerConsumer {
.
sessionType = SessionType.STATELESS;
}
This will lead to problems when users write a @stateful session bean BeanA
and also define it in DD without a session type.
enterprise-beans
session
Hi David,
you are right that it's 1101448 that caused this regression, I met the
same problem and attached a patch to OPENEJB-1552.
see more details:
Hi Devs,
Actually, I have two questions on openejb logger.
1, What's the benefit to use a customized logger factory with assigned
category ?
2, What's the reason to use org.apache.openejb.util.resources instead
of the owner class name as the loggers' basename in most of classes ?
An
Hi David and dsh,
I'm honored to be one of openejb committer candidates : )
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:41 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
We're probably way overdue for assessing our future committer situation.
We have some great people doing excellent work and some of them
this issue.
I *thought* we had tests for that, but maybe the aren't as good as I
remember.
Didn't have time to dig into any of that, though.
-David
On Apr 12, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Ivan wrote:
I will check those JIRA soon.
2011/4/11 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
https
Thanks ! I just sent a mail to tck list to add more details on the failed
tck case.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:33 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks, Shawn for the notes and patch on OPENEJB-1531. If you could post
to any of the tck lists one or more of the affected
Thanks, David.
I'll synchronize the changes to geronimo.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:55 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone shed some light on this ?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Shawn Jiang
--
From: Shawn Jiang (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date: Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 9:45 PM
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (OPENEJB-1352) Validator injection
To: comm...@openejb.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all
should bypass these three bindings.
- Romain
2011/4/24 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
Hi Devs,
Recent changes in OPENEJB-1352 brought many geronimo tck regression.
Because geronimo has its own BV handling logic, I attached a patch to
bypass the openejb BV processing code when
Can anyone shed some light on this ?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
I met a NPE in
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.EjbJarBuilder.build(EjbJarInfo,
ListInjection) {
...
Container container = (Container) props.get(ejbInfo.containerId
Can anyone shed some light on this ?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
# Specifies the time an invokation should wait for an instance
# of the pool to become available.
#
# After the timeout is reached, if an instance in the pool cannot
Thank you !
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:08 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Shawn!
Thanks for pointing this out. I committed something that should screen out
those invalid classes.
-David
On Apr 20, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Hi devs,
Any ideas
Hi devs,
Any ideas on this issue ?
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
org.apache.openejb.config.NewLoaderLogic.callers() will return some callers
and then use these callers to create a new ejbmodule.
When there are abstract classes in the caller
org.apache.openejb.config.NewLoaderLogic.callers() will return some callers
and then use these callers to create a new ejbmodule.
When there are abstract classes in the caller stacktrace, the abstract
classes will also be used to create the ejbmodule. Because
Following operations within singleton EJB should be allowed in
POST_CONSTRUCT and PRE_DESTROY callbacks according to EJB 3.1 spec --
section.4.8.6 -- Table 3.
case timerMethod:
case setRollbackOnly:
case getRollbackOnly:
case
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1522 and attched a
patch to adjust the operation checking logic for singleton EJB.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Following operations within singleton EJB should be allowed in
POST_CONSTRUCT
# Specifies the time an invokation should wait for an instance
# of the pool to become available.
#
# After the timeout is reached, if an instance in the pool cannot
# be obtained, the method invocation will fail.
#
# Usable time units: nanoseconds, microsecons, milliseconds,
The single action timer data set the expiration as start time of the simple
trigger, so that nextFireTime of simple trigger is still null after the
initialization process.
org.apache.openejb.core.timer.SingleActionTimerData.initializeTrigger()
@Override
public Trigger initializeTrigger() {
;
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
The single action timer data set the expiration as start time of the simple
trigger, so that nextFireTime of simple trigger is still null after the
initialization process
Currently, the code in openejb assume there's only 1 @Timeout annotated
method within a EJB. Actually, when there's multiple @timeout in the
class inheritance hierarchy.
The finder would return a method list the size of which is 1.
Following patch would use the @Timeout method in the bottom
only cover single
day and simple range cases.WeekDay, day to last, Last are all valid
items for DayOfMonth values. we need to support them as below:
1, WeekDay style: 2nd mon, 3rd wed,1st sun
2, day to last style: -3,-5
3, Last as element: 4, last
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Shawn
).
Jean-Louis
2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
OWB 1.1.0 is under vote.We need to decide to use the released 1.1.0
or
coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have to
change OWB code to fix
OWB 1.1.0 is under vote.We need to decide to use the released 1.1.0 or
coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have to
change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
--
Shawn
The problem is still there.
I changed openejb source revision in AHP to 1071151 to avoid the failures
for now.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Following change[1] mentioned in your mail breaks geronimo TCK completely.
the app could not be deployed
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Shawn,
OK, i can now build geronimo, openejb and all necessary stuff on my
computer.
I'd like to finish deployment refactoring, tomcat ...
Can you please give me some hints to:
- integrate my local openejb
Sorry, I'm very busy on other stuff and will come back to this issue later.
Have you tried to build the stable m2 source[1] instead with a clean local
repo ?
[1]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M2/
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Thank you Mark !
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
hiho!
Yup, I'll push one in the next half hour.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 1/17/11, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
Subject: Fwd: Can't compile
Thank you Jean-Louis !
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I will commit the patch for you.
Thanks.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
not yet, the compilation error is still there.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
Hum ... AFAIK it should have been fixed by David J.
Jean-Louis
--
View this message in context:
Sure it was working before the refactoring in 1321.
The war ejb module detection was completed in DeploymentLoader alone with
ddDir WEB-INF when geronimo invoke it.
After the refactor, it starts to use DeploymentsResolver to do the job.
Because DeploymenetsResolver will use new DeploymentLoader
[WARNING] COMPILATION WARNING :
[INFO] -
[WARNING]
/opt/anthill3/agent/var/jobs/projects/Common/3_2_OpenEJB_build/project/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/util/PojoSerialization.java:[38,33]
sun.misc.Unsafe is
Sorry Jean-Louis,
I just attached another patch to fix regressions on embed EJB tck. Could
you help review it ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1231
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
jean-louis.monte...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Starting 3.2-SNAPSHOT release
In embed cases, the DeploymentsResolver.loadFromClasspath call comes from
org.apache.openejb.config.ConfigurationFactory.getModulesFromClassPath(ListString,
ClassLoader)
so that the previous patch does not take into effect here at all.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
jean-louis.monte...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Hi Shawn,
are you sure that is necessary?
I can't see why actually.
include/exclude are now set to by default (previous) patch, so applying
before or after systemapps does not matter. Right?
Please hold.
the refactoring is blocking geronimo ejb tck from running. I'm working on
this and will provide a patch today.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
jean-louis.monte...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Hi,
i've been working on openejb refactoring.
Now, everything seems
Just attached two patches to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1231
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1231because I believe the
commit for 1231 is the root cases. Please review.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
Please hold
+1 TCK 100% passed wiith geronimo 2.2. branch.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
Oooo-kaaay. Thanks everyone so much for the patience. Here we have
another set of binaries that can actually compile and run in Java 5 :)
Third time's the charm!
All EJB related tck cases passed with geronimo 22 branch.
+1
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Jon
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:03 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
Ok. This one should be pretty quick -- not too many
All EJB related TCK cases passed with geronimo 2.2 branch.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:16 PM, dagerber daniel.gerb...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Tested the binaries with jetty/openejb in embedded mode == works as
expected
--
View this message in context:
Geronimo 22 branch TCK 100% passed with this staging release. +1
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:30 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
Alright, begin binary banging.
Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-017/
Binaries:
Geronimo 2.2 branch 100% passed tck with this staging openejb 3.1.3
artifacts. It's time to start the vote.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com wrote:
Just ran this. I ran into one problem which was the Tomcat bundle trying to
use the
Thanks David ! There's another one for tck:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1308
I've uploaded a patch to it, could you please help review it ?
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:58 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
IIRC,
it ?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:54 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Jun 24, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Could yo please review the patch I attached in this JIRA ?
[see below]
On Thu, Jun 24
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:54 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Jun 24, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Could yo please review the patch I attached in this JIRA ?
[see below]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:15 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
wrote:
Good
Could yo please review the patch I attached in this JIRA ?
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:15 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
Hi Shawn!
Missed this patch in JIRA. Feel free to post anytime you have a patch for
review.
On Jun 13, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Shawn Jiang (JIRA) wrote
I did't get it.
If the data is cleared, the ejb client will lose the connection info to
other nodes. As a result, there will be no failover. Is a expected
behavior for a clustering ?
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Currently, we keep a map on the
Could anyone help push a new snapshot to the repo ?Geronimo 2.2 branch
can't start without the new open ejb snapshot including this jira.
Thanks in advance !
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand, to add default unit for these attributes
Got it, thanks !
I know I need to build it locally to resolve critical. But I still think it
would be better that latest snapshots could be pushed automatically. : )
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:35 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.comwrote:
On Jun 6, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:24 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 1, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 27, 2010, at 5:03 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Thu May 27 21:03:52 2010
Hi dev,
Can anyone help look at the patch ? It's a blocker for geronimo 2.2.1
release. Thanks in advance !
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shawn Jiang (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Date: Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:28 PM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (OPENEJB-1287) java.lang.NullPointerException
81 matches
Mail list logo
