Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Mohammad, i think TomEE just starts to be a bit known so i don't think we can (should) change this name even if you are right. *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn:

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Agree with Romain, There is some buzz around TomEE and I'm afraid that changing the name changes this advertising ;) Regards JB On 11/13/2012 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi Mohammad, i think TomEE just starts to be a bit known so i don't think we can (should) change this name even

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Alex The Rocker
I agree with Romain : I work in a major software company, about to release products with dependency on Tomcat replaced by TomEE. It would be annoying to change the prerequisite name at the last minute. If the name changes, then please consider a deprecation period during which both TomEE and

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Charles Moulliard
Hi Mohammed, Changing the name is not really appropriate for the different reasons that JB, Romain have discussed. Moreover and even if JavaEE 7 is more focused on Java Bean development simplification, EE is not only focused on JavaBean and cover a lot of others Java Specs (not related) -- CDI,

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
The discussion thread is pretty accurate actually. Regarding the name, TomEE seems to be definietly the name we wanna keep. But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP at Apache? That's the question I guess, and I'm for it. JLouis 2012/11/13 Mohammad Nour

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi :) On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Mohammed, Changing the name is not really appropriate for the different reasons that JB, Romain have discussed. Moreover and even if JavaEE 7 is more focused on Java Bean development simplification, EE is

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
[joke not accurate] i like E3 (or E^3) -- EfficientEE [/joke] *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github:

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote: The discussion thread is pretty accurate actually. Regarding the name, TomEE seems to be definietly the name we wanna keep. But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP at Apache?

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.comwrote: I agree with Jean-Louis' proposal to make TLP's name official site naming consistent with TomEE or *whatevername*. joke I dislike BeansEE proposal, because it too easy to joke about it: think about how Bug BeansEE

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
I agree. I don't think we should rename TomEE - its well known and renaming has the potential to cause confusion. I do think, however, that changing TomEE to be the top level project, with OpenEJB as the subproject makes sense. Jon On Nov 13, 2012 10:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO

Re: [DISCUSS] - Project name

2012-11-13 Thread David Blevins
On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote: But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP at Apache? Exactly. That's the ultimate subject I wanted to bring up, but wanted to give Mohammad the chance to raise his concerns about