Hi Mohammad,
i think TomEE just starts to be a bit known so i don't think we can
(should) change this name even if you are right.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn:
Agree with Romain,
There is some buzz around TomEE and I'm afraid that changing the name
changes this advertising ;)
Regards
JB
On 11/13/2012 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi Mohammad,
i think TomEE just starts to be a bit known so i don't think we can
(should) change this name even
I agree with Romain : I work in a major software company, about to release
products with dependency on Tomcat replaced by TomEE.
It would be annoying to change the prerequisite name at the last minute.
If the name changes, then please consider a deprecation period during
which both TomEE and
Hi Mohammed,
Changing the name is not really appropriate for the different reasons that
JB, Romain have discussed. Moreover and even if JavaEE 7 is more focused on
Java Bean development simplification, EE is not only focused on JavaBean
and cover a lot of others Java Specs (not related) -- CDI,
The discussion thread is pretty accurate actually.
Regarding the name, TomEE seems to be definietly the name we wanna keep.
But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP
at Apache?
That's the question I guess, and I'm for it.
JLouis
2012/11/13 Mohammad Nour
Hi :)
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Mohammed,
Changing the name is not really appropriate for the different reasons that
JB, Romain have discussed. Moreover and even if JavaEE 7 is more focused on
Java Bean development simplification, EE is
[joke not accurate]
i like E3 (or E^3) -- EfficientEE
[/joke]
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
The discussion thread is pretty accurate actually.
Regarding the name, TomEE seems to be definietly the name we wanna keep.
But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP
at Apache?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Alex The Rocker alex.m3...@gmail.comwrote:
I agree with Jean-Louis' proposal to make TLP's name official site naming
consistent with TomEE or *whatevername*.
joke
I dislike BeansEE proposal, because it too easy to joke about it: think
about how Bug BeansEE
I agree. I don't think we should rename TomEE - its well known and renaming
has the potential to cause confusion.
I do think, however, that changing TomEE to be the top level project, with
OpenEJB as the subproject makes sense.
Jon
On Nov 13, 2012 10:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP
at Apache?
Exactly. That's the ultimate subject I wanted to bring up, but wanted to give
Mohammad the chance to raise his concerns about
11 matches
Mail list logo