ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread Thiago Veronezi
Are we going to have problems with the Eclipse Public License and the Apache Licence. I don't find a place stating they are compatible. http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php []s, Thiago. -- Forwarded message -- From: Romain

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread Thiago Veronezi
As long as we don't create our own Eclipse RAP project, we wont have problems, right? Licencing... so boring! []s, Thiago. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.orgwrote: Are we going to have problems with the Eclipse Public License and the Apache Licence. I

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
hmm we will not use eclipse right? dont eat too much dependencies to avoid to be too fat for simple needs :p - Romain 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org As long as we don't create our own Eclipse RAP project, we wont have problems, right? Licencing... so boring! []s,

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread dsh
To answer your question - I found this site [1]. Tho, don't know how authoritative it is. Concerning RAP - I mentioned it cause it provides a way to deal with UI programming in a more traditional way like you would do if using AWT/SWT/Swing or MFC... not sure whether we should consider it for the

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
My understanding is that if you depend on the binaries and not the source, then you are ok... over in Maven Land we instituted a policy that Category B licenses (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) as dependencies in core had to be approved by a strict majority of the PMC. Plugins published

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
Here is our policy for what it is worth: http://maven.apache.org/developers/dependency-policies.html Note: our policy has some h(y|i)st(e|o)rical reasons for existence as well, ones which OpenEJB may not feel necessary... On 29 May 2012 15:06, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread Thiago Veronezi
I dont think we should use Eclipse at this time, but at least now we have documented something about the licences compatibility issue. Thanks guys! []s, Thiago. On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Here is our policy for what it is worth:

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
tomcat bring a compiler under this lincence i think - Romain 2012/5/29 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com On May 29, 2012, at 7:26 AM, Thiago Veronezi wrote: I dont think we should use Eclipse at this time, but at least now we have documented something about the licences

Re: ASF and Eclipse Public Licence

2012-05-29 Thread David Blevins
On May 29, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: tomcat bring a compiler under this lincence i think Exactly. -David 2012/5/29 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com On May 29, 2012, at 7:26 AM, Thiago Veronezi wrote: I dont think we should use Eclipse at this time, but at