Build broken

2012-02-19 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.3.2:compile (default-compile) on project openejb-http: Compilation failure [ERROR] /home/acabrera/dev/openejb/openejb/server/openejb-http/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/server/httpd/OpenEJBHttpServer.java:[238,53]

Re: Build broken

2012-02-19 Thread dsh
I guess the breakage has been introduced by revision 1290935 [1]. [1] http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-trunk-ubuntu/builds/1923 Cheers Daniel On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal

Re: Build broken

2012-02-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
hope it is better now @David: why sout rather than logger in debug? - Romain 2012/2/19 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com I guess the breakage has been introduced by revision 1290935 [1]. [1] http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-trunk-ubuntu/builds/1923 Cheers Daniel On Sun, Feb 19,

Re: Build broken

2012-02-19 Thread David Blevins
On Feb 19, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: for logging: properties as usually? Possible you could write a short doc on that for the testing scenario? I have never really worked with juli. the question behind is: i am on a server and i don't have sysout how do i do? with logger

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-28 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Before going ahead, i'd like to share a patch file. I did some refactoring and before going ahead i want to share it with you to get your opinion. Will try to push it today is possible. If it takes too long maybe just share the

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-28 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
to push a post, a jira, a patch ... I'd be more than happy to commit it for you. Help is always welcome. Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Re-OpenEJB-3-1-2-maven-build-broken-due-to-ActiveMQ-dependency-tp1015106p1401324.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-28 Thread Andy
On 28.01.2010 23:38, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Hey Andy, sorry for the very long delay. Firstly, i believed we could refactor some activemq integration before checking in your patch. But, to be honest, i'm not really happy with that refactoring because it makes things more complicated. So i

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-27 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 26, 2010, at 8:09 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: David Blevins wrote: Right, exactly. Was just going to post that. That prefix works just fine. Or even just amq4factory and amq5factory or something. Just as a side note, i would like to keep things working between previous

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-27 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Before going ahead, i'd like to share a patch file. I did some refactoring and before going ahead i want to share it with you to get your opinion. Will try to push it today is possible. Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Re-OpenEJB-3-1-2-maven-build-broken-due

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-27 Thread Andy Gumbrecht
On 27.01.2010 20:06, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Before going ahead, i'd like to share a patch file. I did some refactoring and before going ahead i want to share it with you to get your opinion. Will try to push it today is possible. Jean-Louis I'll take a pew. Andy.

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-26 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
contribution. Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Re-OpenEJB-3-1-2-maven-build-broken-due-to-ActiveMQ-dependency-tp1015106p1290303.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-26 Thread Andy Gumbrecht
I would prefer something like openejb:activemq5:broker:(...) or openejb:activemq4:broker:(...) Would like to get your opinion? Thanks a lot for the great contribution. Jean-Louis Hi Jean-Louis, I would agree, but the path prefix is defined internally by the ActiveMQ implementation -

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-25 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 23, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Andy wrote: Ok, I was kidding myself. My test was somewhat flawed. However, I am sure that I have it covered now, including poms. If someone in authority could check my suggested trunk patch I'd be grateful. (against -

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-25 Thread Andy
Consider it done.. Can you attach the patch to this jira? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1227 -David Virus checked by G Data AntiVirus Version: AVA 19.9771 dated 25.01.2010

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-21 Thread Andy
Is there a way to get maven to conditionally compile certain classes against different artifact versions of ActiveMQ within the same project? I have a working build against 5.3.0 (replaced 4.1.1), but can't see a way of keeping 'ActiveMQ4Factory' in the same project (see below) - I currently

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.2 maven build broken due to ActiveMQ dependency

2010-01-15 Thread Quintin Beukes
Hey, I'll do this. To use ActiveMQ with embedded OpenEJB, I just create a MDB and post messages to it? Quintin Beukes On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:39 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote: On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote: Is there a reason why such an 'old'