Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

good morning... I have the same messages in my recordings... Meeting and then i will do the stepbystep thing... ;-) Greetings Peter Am 06.03.2014 04:36, schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > I have just checked the file you have created: > > [flashsv @ 0x28fcd60] Frame width or height differs from firs

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi All, Recordings were unstable in the previous releases too, I believe this have not become worse. I would suggest make a release for now and file bugs about the recordings problems. My vote is +1. Best regards, Irina On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Vasiliy Degtyarev wrote: > +1 > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

My vote is +1. Denis Kandrov. On 03.03.2014 23:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: Dear OpenMeetings Community, I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 RC2 Main changes are covered in the Readme: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/3.0.0RC2/README Full C

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi at all, my vote is -1 screen-recording should be fixed (or investigated what went wrong here)... I made an update to a version without screen recording (2.2). The people will not understand, that the next major-update will come without this feature... Sorry... Greetings Peter Am 03.03.2014

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi Peter, I believe the first step to have recordings issue resolved is to create informative bug in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS Could you please create a bug and describe exact steps how to reproduce the issue, describe your environment, etc.? It would be really help

Re: Open Calendar: Reccurence events support

Hi Bharath, It's nice to meet you! as a first step I would suggest you: 1). To try it on demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings - there is a free registration here, and after you registered and signed in just select the Home -> Calendar menu item to get to the OpenMeetings calendar. Here you can check how

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

I am closing the Vote for the Release Candidate 2, 72 hours are over. The Vote is considered to be positive, it received: 5 PPMC +1: solomax, albus, vdegtyatev, dkandrov, iarkh Wider Community: 1 times +1Keiji Ono 1 time -1: Peter Däh

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

Hello Sebastian, can you please update OPENMEETINGS-936 with as detailed repo steps as possible I'll try to modify the screen sharing applet to address your issue, but detailed steps might help On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Maxim Solodov

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

Hi Maxim, yes sorry I had no time yesterday what exactly is the different between height/width and flv_height/flv_width. I will try to come back on that later. Sebastian 2014-03-07 6:35 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik : > Hello Sebastian, > > can you please update > OPENMEETINGS-936

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Sorry but I am not voting positive. I do not agree that the recording issues are "broken the same as before". I would rather like to resolve that before we ship that RC. If we release a RC as 3.x and we already know it has bugs that we just do not fix, it will not have the positive effect on the co

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 - Recording and ScreenSharer

According to the code width/height is the original width/height of the picture being sent to Red5 by camera/screensharing app. flv_width/flv_height is resized width/height multiple by 16 and applied on the last step of the conversion. Not sure how were you able to get first frame of another size

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

While I do not have a vote in this. I agree with Sebastian. This release does not sound like it is ready. It's bad form to release a product with known major bugs. Joseph Joseph Karwat | CEO | 415.462.0263 Jell Networks, LLC -Original Message- From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

I would also like to ship "bug free release", but unfortunately it is impossible. Last few releases were tested/voted in the manner I personally do not like: 1) no testing/issues during development phase 2) lots of "last day" show stoppers right after the VOTE is begin I would prefer to release 3.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

The problem with these "major bugs" is: it is not reported. Really weird situation On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Joseph Karwat wrote: > While I do not have a vote in this. I agree with Sebastian. This release > does not sound like it is ready. It's bad form to release a product with > know

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2

Nobody else is reporting any errors because nobody else is using it. I literally have not been able to create a single working recording with that release. And I see major issues in the CPU usage that are un-explained. If that kind of behavior is reproduce able on other machines you can simply not

OM-bd: Association of imported files and room

Hi all, I have to debug why files imported via the API are not showing up in the conference file tab. Thus, I identified a particular room in the "room"-table, but was not able to link this room to the files listed in "|fileexploreritem"-table|. May someone tell me how those tables are associa