[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

I am closing the Vote for the Release Candidate 1, 72 hours are over. The Vote is considered to be negative: - too few activity: 3 votes in 2+ weeks - README was agreed to be corrected The VOTE thread is here:

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

I think README is ok. -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, http://openmeetings.apache.org/ [2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/ [3] Join

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

@Alexei, I believe red5sip issues should not affect OM release cycle. I was planning to release 2.1.1RC1. Please let me know if RC2 should be packed. (I see no need for this right now) In case README and/or NOTICE need to be changed I would really appreciate if anybody will send me the new text.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Should it be in NOTES or README or both? On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.comwrote: Are there any objections to the following text? --- Video/audio SIP integration is no longer a part of Apache release. Check free red5sip product for this integration.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

In my opinion release notes should contain Openmeetings changes since last release only, so: 1. Recordings didn't work in 2.1 and still don't work. We have no changes and there are nothing to write in release notes about them. 2. red5sip has never been Openmeetings part and we shouldn't write

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

I know from the past that you have been not allowed to use the same device in multiple Flash Applications at the same time. In the past it was for example even like that: If a microphone or camera device was taken, the Flash Plagin *magically* knew it and any further request to Microphone.get();

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

I'm constantly getting enlightened by many people that red4sip is not a part of Openmeetings. I'm well aware of that fact. :-) Adobe Flash is not a part of Openmeetings as well, and cause us the problems anyway. If you program does not run on Linux, release notes should say, does not run on

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:08 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: * Multi-tabbing (no other flash application should be running in different browsers or tabs)* = I don't see any problem in running two instances of OpenMeetings next to each other, I do that all the time for

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Artyom, release notes are written for a user. Imagine you are one. Notes should help you and tell you that despite openmeetings.apache.org web site which mentions recordings they do not work for real conferences in 2.1.1. If you learn this by trial and error, it will take a lot of your time.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

That was intended to be one sentence, (it is broken in the text) For those who don't trust, let's try a recording session online and check. -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

* Multi-tabbing (no other flash application should be running in different browsers or tabs)* This is a well-known problem with Flash on Linux = Then the sentence might be more like: Running multiple instance of OpenMeetings or Flash applications on Linux can cause issues with the stability of

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Sebastian, I have tested audio SIP integration by using SIP bridge for my own conferences. As a result, Artyom found out that disabling jitter-buffer in the Asterisk configuration improves audio. Artyom, where one can find your findings on the Apache web site? Does it worth reflecting this in

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Hello Alexei, I've just changed sip integration instruction a little by adding denoise and dsp_drop_silence attributes and removed silent detection in red5sip because there were some problems with it. I think we shouldn't include any information about red5sip improvement into Openmeetings release

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

I think Artyom is right. Red5Sip is not the scope of the OpenMeetings project. Me might discuss on how we can make it the scope, if we are able to create an Incubator project around Red5Sip. I think for the end user this discussion (scope or not) is a rather esoteric discussion as they are simply

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

We have 3 +1 votes from PMCs. So in theory it is possible. However it would be good if there is some more feedback in the community about that release. Anybody else has been testing this release? Sebastian 2013/6/22 Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.com I believe we should release rc1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Release vote happens on dev list, never on private. Please vote on dev, as the link to the dev list will be what we publish as a result of the vote. I am sorry but I can't test before next week as I don't have a Internet connection good enough while I travel abroad. Thanks, Sebastian

[VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 1

Dear OpenMeetings Community, I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 RC1 Main changes are covered in the Readme: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC1/README Full Changelog: