Board report April: infrastructure wishlist

The periodic report to the Apache Board about the status of the OpenOffice project and community is due in about one month. You can find an initial draft of the April report at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr but it is almost completely empty and not worth reading y

Re: suggestion for another cwiki change..new

I am personally fine with whatever you do along the lines of surfacing current planning efforts and archiving old efforts. For cwiki articles that should be moved to Mwiki then perhaps a "For MWiki" category would make sense. If you need someone with full confluence admin rights let me know, I'

Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

On 9 March 2013 21:57, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > janI wrote: > >> that is perfectly within the ruleset. >> > > Perfect. > > > I thought the reason for local users was >> - get their work named or >> - allow them to do review (not possible on suggestions) or >> - save committers work >> as you sug

suggestion for another cwiki change..new

Right now, for top level categories on cwiki, we have the following: - Project Planning -

Re: cleanup of cwiki...

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Alexandro Colorado >> wrote: >> > >> >> I rarerly go to the cwiki nowadays. I think this info shou

Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

janI wrote: that is perfectly within the ruleset. Perfect. I thought the reason for local users was - get their work named or - allow them to do review (not possible on suggestions) or - save committers work as you suggest I cannot see the difference to using anonymous as we have it today ? W

Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

On Mar 9, 2013, at 6:57 AM, janI wrote: > On Mar 9, 2013 3:18 PM, "Andrea Pescetti" wrote: >> >> janI wrote: >>> >>> That does not (as I read it) state that we can bypass RTC for >>> non-committers. Allowing non-committers access is one thing, but allowing >>> them to change the source (in thi

FW: GRANT OF LICENSE: Dennis Hamilton LibreOffice contributions

I have made this grant known to The Document Foundation and the LibreOffice project. The TDF notification appears at . If any use of my contributions to LibreOffice by Apache Projects is questioned, you can cite this grant if a

RE: Dual licensing of patches and code

It is not clear to me that the Apache OpenOffice statement answers the question as it was asked at [tdf-discuss]. I read Jim's question as being about multi-licensing (dual- or more). Not about a contributor making a contribution of their original work in two places and under different licenses i

Re: Dual licensing of patches and code

On 13-03-09, at 05:39 , Andrea Pescetti wrote: > The conversation below happened in public, but not on the OpenOffice public > lists. I believe it's good to record its outcome here on the OpenOffice dev > list too. Yes; thanks! > > Summary: > - Question from Jim Jagielski: "Is a contributio

Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

On Mar 9, 2013 3:18 PM, "Andrea Pescetti" wrote: > > janI wrote: >> >> That does not (as I read it) state that we can bypass RTC for >> non-committers. Allowing non-committers access is one thing, but allowing >> them to change the source (in this case text) directly is quite another. > > > Sure.

Re: how do you do?

2013/3/9 Simple Good > I read many development in the OO project but I never hear abt a > simple basic thing, the new MS Office menu beginning with MS Office > 2007. Why can't OO follow the MS Office menu. > Because AOO is NOT MSOffice. There are new UI elements being developed for AOO 4.0 (sear

Re: how do you do?

I read many development in the OO project but I never hear abt a simple basic thing, the new MS Office menu beginning with MS Office 2007. Why can't OO follow the MS Office menu. On 3/9/13, Jihui Choi wrote: > Hello, there. > Niceto meet you, Kim YongRim. > > There might be a top leader because t

Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

janI wrote: That does not (as I read it) state that we can bypass RTC for non-committers. Allowing non-committers access is one thing, but allowing them to change the source (in this case text) directly is quite another. Sure. The setting for new volunteers would be: 1) No paperwork, no ICLA,

Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

On 9 March 2013 12:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 03/03/2013 janI wrote: > >> On 3 March 2013 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> 1) Check on the Pootle 2.5 release date and features. >>> >> I would like to see it running on other sites the translate itself, but I >> am just a negative (have be

Re: update service for not released languages [was: Re: Registration]

On 03/03/2013 janI wrote: On 3 March 2013 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote: 1) Check on the Pootle 2.5 release date and features. I would like to see it running on other sites the translate itself, but I am just a negative (have been too long in support). My rule of thumb is release date + 1 month,

office 3.4

Hi I have been using office for years without problems. Today I tried updating to 3.4 - with disastrous results. It has taken me all morning to get rid of the wretched thing. When opening 3.4 all I got was a blue mark on the screen about 20mm by 4 mm. I tried reinstalling a couple of times. So n

Re: Review Board

Dave Fisher wrote on Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 15:35:31 -0800: > > On Mar 8, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI wrote: > >> On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Only if we are going to

Re: Dual licensing of patches and code

The conversation below happened in public, but not on the OpenOffice public lists. I believe it's good to record its outcome here on the OpenOffice dev list too. Summary: - Question from Jim Jagielski: "Is a contribution under ALv2 + MPL + LGPLv3+ acceptable to both OpenOffice and LibreOffice

Re: how do you do?

I'm leaving previous answers below since Kim YongRim is not subscribed to this list and may have missed them. Kim YongRim: welcome to Apache OpenOffice! For more information about the project structure and governance you can see http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/ (Levels 1 and 2). And t