On 4 April 2013 06:19, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 um 22:46 schrieb Rob Weir:
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/03/2013 janI wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 3 March 2013 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 1) Check on the Poo
Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 um 22:58 schrieb janI:
> On 3 April 2013 19:51, Pavel Janík wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > On 4/3/13 10:45 AM, janI wrote:
> > > > On 3 April 2013 10:22, Pavel Janík wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >
Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 um 22:46 schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> > On 03/03/2013 janI wrote:
> >
> > > On 3 March 2013 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1) Check on the Pootle 2.5 release date and features.
> > > I would like to see it
Thanks, Rob, et al.,
On 13-04-03, at 22:22 , Peter Junge wrote:
One way of implementing this would be to look at all commits for the
>>> past 6
months (or 1 year?) and remove authorization on /trunk, /tag and
>>> /branches
for those who have not made commits. But preserve a
On 4/3/2013 9:05 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
I think restricting this would be a horrible idea, since we still have
a shortage of developers. Limiting it by permissions and creating a
red tape would be even more problematic. I think the key her
This article is really a good idea.
"... distributing correct information and P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }
use such incorrect information ..." in the third sentence should be
corrected for an obvious reason.
On 4/3/2013 8:10 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I am a little bit annoyed about the
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:58 PM, janI wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 22:30, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: [...]
> > >
> > >> On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > > one change to our current process t
I'm going to top-post. I agree that this is a good idea, but I want to define
it expansively as a positive.
(1) The current authz that defines all of the AOO committers must be preserved.
This is used to generate foundation information like:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#o
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, David Coldwell wrote:
> version 3.0 files won't load into version 2.3 so I have to replace 3.0
> with 2.3.
> Why aren't there any links to older versions?
>
>
They are in the archived releases folders. For example, the 2.3 versions
are here:
http://archive.servic
Am 04/01/2013 03:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/01/2013 01:49 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Apr 1, 2013, at 3:54 AM, "Marcus (OOo)" wrote:
Am 04/01/2013 03:20 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Am 04/03/2013 10:58 PM, schrieb janI:
On 3 April 2013 22:30, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote: [...]
On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
one change to our current process that will, I think, greatly
increase
security. T
On 4/3/2013 8:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 01/04/2013 janI wrote:
A volunteer does not need to be an expert, that can be learned,
possibility
to react swiftly to alers in your TZ is the key. General knowledge about
mysql/php is a clear advantage. In general we talk about 1-2 hours
work pr
version 3.0 files won't load into version 2.3 so I have to replace 3.0
with 2.3.
Why aren't there any links to older versions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: de
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:46 AM, janI wrote:
> On 1 April 2013 01:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> > The OpenOffice project maintains a few machines with different people
> > responsible for them. One step forward for better maintenance would be to
> > build a small team of LAMP administrators here
Le 03/04/2013 15:13, Rob Weir a écrit :
3) We have those who are voted in as committers and might access other, non
SVN systems. They use their Apache ID's to write blog posts, access Pootle
directly, or maybe even just the SMTP servers. But they never touch SVN at
all.
I'm one of these commi
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> My sense of this is that there is a desire to reduce the "threat surface"
> of the SVN by requiring committers to opt-in. (I assume there is some way
> to decide which committers to grandfather.) Apparently, that is a one-time
> act and
My sense of this is that there is a desire to reduce the "threat surface" of
the SVN by requiring committers to opt-in. (I assume there is some way to
decide which committers to grandfather.) Apparently, that is a one-time act
and it doesn't alter being relatively inactive. So I guess this wi
On 3 April 2013 19:19, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
>
> > On 01/04/2013 janI wrote:
> >
> >> A volunteer does not need to be an expert, that can be learned,
> >> possibility
> >> to react swiftly to alers in your TZ is the key. General knowledge ab
On 3 April 2013 19:51, Pavel Janík wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On 4/3/13 10:45 AM, janI wrote:
> >> On 3 April 2013 10:22, Pavel Janík wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> http://tmp.janik.cz/AO/binfilter-removal.diff
> >>>
> >>> This is the first attempt to r
On 3 April 2013 22:30, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
>
> > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: [...]
> >
> >> On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > one change to our current process that will, I think, greatly
> increase
> >
> > security.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 janI wrote:
>
>> On 3 March 2013 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> 1) Check on the Pootle 2.5 release date and features.
>>>
>> I would like to see it running on other sites the translate itself, but I
>>
>> am just a negat
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote: [...]
>
>> On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
> one change to our current process that will, I think, greatly increase
>
> security. This would be to restrict SVN authorization for the code
>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I'm not clear why a non-LDAP solution is required:
>
> 1. Being a committer is specific to a project. What it means to be a
> committer on a project is very well-defined.
>
>
And in some Apache projects they do exactly what I am proposi
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:
> Hi
>
> The link on home page openoffce.org is broken to pinterest.
>
> Correct: http://pinterest.com/openoffice/
>
>
Fixed. Thanks!
-Rob
> Albino
>
> -
> To unsubscribe,
I'm not clear why a non-LDAP solution is required:
1. Being a committer is specific to a project. What it means to be a
committer on a project is very well-defined.
2. The SVN repositories of the public ASF projects are publicly read-only.
That's a no-brainer. They are only writable to tho
Hi
The link on home page openoffce.org is broken to pinterest.
Correct: http://pinterest.com/openoffice/
Albino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffic
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/13 10:45 AM, janI wrote:
>> On 3 April 2013 10:22, Pavel Janík wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> http://tmp.janik.cz/AO/binfilter-removal.diff
>>>
>>> This is the first attempt to remove module binfilter. To add more to this,
>>> we should re
Jürgen Schmidt wrote: [...]
On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
one change to our current process that will, I think, greatly increase
security. This would be to restrict SVN authorization for the code
I don't think this would greatly increase security, since the current
review model wou
Hi Claudio, et a.
On 13-04-03, at 13:22 , Claudio Filho wrote:
> Hi
>
> We can *try* to organize some thing there. Subscription of talks is opened.
>
> IMHO, we can try to bring some key people to present the ecosystem of AOO
> and its evolution. I will contact the organization and to know wha
Hi
We can *try* to organize some thing there. Subscription of talks is opened.
IMHO, we can try to bring some key people to present the ecosystem of AOO
and its evolution. I will contact the organization and to know what we can
do.
In my way, i will submit the same talk that i did in a gov event
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 janI wrote:
>
>> A volunteer does not need to be an expert, that can be learned,
>> possibility
>> to react swiftly to alers in your TZ is the key. General knowledge about
>> mysql/php is a clear advantage. In general we talk
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> I am a little bit annoyed about the often bad researched articles about
>>> OpenOffice or at least articles spreading wrong information about
>>> OpenOffice.
> De: Louis Suárez-Potts
> Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 3 de Abril de 2013 11:24
>
> As to Fisl 14, let's discuss this directly?
Yes, no problem. :-)
> I do want a strong presence
> there, with you, Claudio, others. It would be independent of any ODF plugfest.
The FISL [1] is a comprehensive env
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I am a little bit annoyed about the often bad researched articles about
OpenOffice or at least articles spreading wrong information about
OpenOffice. ...
If we wait a little longer we might be able to achieve the safe effect
2013/4/3 janI
> On 3 April 2013 01:27, RGB ES wrote:
>
> > 2013/3/29 Ariel Constenla-Haile
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:27:30PM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
> > > > If you look at this page
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/ES/Manuales/GuiaAOO/TemasAvanzados/Macros/Sta
On 01/04/2013 janI wrote:
A volunteer does not need to be an expert, that can be learned, possibility
to react swiftly to alers in your TZ is the key. General knowledge about
mysql/php is a clear advantage. In general we talk about 1-2 hours work pr
month, not including upgrades.
Adding to what
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> BTW trying to untar it, it spew some error:
> tar -xzvf
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz_2013-03-12_04\:29\:29_1455404.tar.gz
> tar (child): Cannot connect to
Looks like it thinks it is a hostname. Use tar ...
Forwarding the answer below to Sand Wen who is not subscribed. Sand Wen:
welcome and please read http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/ too.
Andrea.
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Welcome, please mention your skillset and we can provide ideas on
where in OO would you feel more confortable.
On 4
BTW trying to untar it, it spew some error:
tar -xzvf
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz_2013-03-12_04\:29\:29_1455404.tar.gz
tar (child): Cannot connect to
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz_2013-03-12_04:
resolve failed
gzip: stdin: unexpected end
On 3/27/13 3:23 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Different opinions came up and we had some discussion and you
>> pointed out that you can live with feedback. Where is exactly
>> your problem now?
>
> I don't have any problem at
On 03/04/2013 16:13, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:06 AM, janI wrote:
>
>> On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> We're starting to take a deeper look at what is required to integrate
>> code
>>> signing into the OpenOffice build and release process. As you probably
>> know
>>
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:51 PM, wrote:
> (6). Laptop is an example for a super computer
>
Personally I've been very happy with my Cray SuperBook. Running global
weather simulations doesn't degrade my Solitaire performance at all.
Don
On 4/3/13 4:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/13 2:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I am a little bit annoyed about the often bad researched articles about
OpenOf
janI wrote:
> But we have to very carefull not make it even harder to become/be
> committer, compare us a bit with LO, there I can have commit access
> within less than a day.
>
Hi Jan,
just to get this straight - we try hard to have your patch committed /
initial feedback provided in a day. Gett
Hi is there any tutorial on working with parallel builds of OpenOffice?
Before there was the ooo-dev/ and the OpenOffice3/ folders, I wonder
if the nightly builds work the same way...
Regards.
--
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://es.openoffice.org
On 13-04-03, at 09:39 , Albino B Neto wrote:
>> De: Albino B Neto
>
>> Para: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
>> Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 3 de Abril de 2013 10:36
>>
>> Every year, I and Claudio and others, were in the event #fis13.
>
>
> Sorry
>
> * Last year * , I and Claudio and others,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/13 2:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am a little bit annoyed about the often bad researched articles about
> >> OpenOffice or at least articles spreading wrong
On 4/3/13 3:55 PM, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
>> have you check if the file is there?
> The file does not exist on my local directory.
>
>> It seems to be a new file and maybe you have to remove the output
> directory and have to make clean fresh build of the odk.
> How I can do this?
remove the
On 4/3/13 10:45 AM, janI wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 10:22, Pavel Janík wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://tmp.janik.cz/AO/binfilter-removal.diff
>>
>> This is the first attempt to remove module binfilter. To add more to this,
>> we should remove directories binfilter and scp2/source/binfilter.
>>
>
> +1
> have you check if the file is there?
The file does not exist on my local directory.
> It seems to be a new file and maybe you have to remove the output
directory and have to make clean fresh build of the odk.
How I can do this?
Certainly the number of revision:
Revision: 1461840
Regards
201
> De: Albino B Neto
> Para: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
> Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 3 de Abril de 2013 10:36
>
> Every year, I and Claudio and others, were in the event #fis13.
Sorry
* Last year * , I and Claudio and others, were in the event #fis13. ;-)
Albino
--
On 4/3/13, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> I think restricting this would be a horrible idea, since we still have
>> a shortage of developers. Limiting it by permissions and creating a
>> red tape would be even more problematic. I think the key her
> De: Louis Suárez-Potts
> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 2 de Abril de 2013 22:42
>
> I certainly hope to make it there again, as I have nearly every year. But
> this time, unlike last year, it would be *great* to have an AOO presence.
> Last year, the OO presence there was under the flag of LibreOffice
On 4/3/13 2:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am a little bit annoyed about the often bad researched articles about
>> OpenOffice or at least articles spreading wrong information about
>> OpenOffice. I don't know exactly why authors do
> De: Rob Weir
> Enviadas: Domingo, 31 de Março de 2013 21:50
>
> It sounds like they are moving to a new platform. Maybe we look at
> this again then.
Yeah ! Is migration for pump.io, read the new note:
https://e14n.com/evan/note/CuaONBbwQcyenRzC93R6Mw
Albino
-
On 4/3/13 3:00 PM, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building in AOO source code, but I have a error in the module odk:
>
> Here the error:
>
> Entering /home/ivan/aoo/main/odk/util
>
> dmake: Error: --
> `../examples/cpp/StatusbarController/WordCountStatusbarController/WordCountDis
On 4/3/13 3:13 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:06 AM, janI wrote:
>
>> On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> We're starting to take a deeper look at what is required to integrate
>> code
>>> signing into the OpenOffice build and release process. As you probably
>> know
>>>
Here is a picture:
http://imagebin.org/252637
2013/4/3 jorge ivan poot diaz
> Hello,
>
> I'm building in AOO source code, but I have a error in the module odk:
>
> Here the error:
>
> Entering /home/ivan/aoo/main/odk/util
>
> dmake: Error: --
> `../examples/cpp/StatusbarController/WordCountSta
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:06 AM, janI wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > We're starting to take a deeper look at what is required to integrate
> code
> > signing into the OpenOffice build and release process. As you probably
> know
> > operating systems, especially Windows and
On 3 April 2013 14:39, Rob Weir wrote:
> We're starting to take a deeper look at what is required to integrate code
> signing into the OpenOffice build and release process. As you probably know
> operating systems, especially Windows and MacOS, are now checking for
> digital signatures and by def
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I think restricting this would be a horrible idea, since we still have
> a shortage of developers. Limiting it by permissions and creating a
> red tape would be even more problematic. I think the key here is about
> the aproved releases.
Hello,
I'm building in AOO source code, but I have a error in the module odk:
Here the error:
Entering /home/ivan/aoo/main/odk/util
dmake: Error: --
`../examples/cpp/StatusbarController/WordCountStatusbarController/WordCountDispatch.hxx'
not found, and can't be made
1 module(s):
odk
need(
I think restricting this would be a horrible idea, since we still have
a shortage of developers. Limiting it by permissions and creating a
red tape would be even more problematic. I think the key here is about
the aproved releases. I don't really use windows, so I am not very
familiar with the topi
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> we have a mailing list pr...@openoffice.apache.org?
>
It is not a mailing list. It is an alias for priv...@openoffice.apache.org.
-Rob
>
> It is neither listed at
> http://openoffice.apache.org/**mailing-lists.html
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a little bit annoyed about the often bad researched articles about
> OpenOffice or at least articles spreading wrong information about
> OpenOffice. I don't know exactly why authors do such a poor job with
> their research of cor
Hi Jürgen,
we have a mailing list pr...@openoffice.apache.org?
It is neither listed at http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
nor at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/
If the list exists, then a blog post announcing it, is a good idea. (And
adding the address in the lists)
We're starting to take a deeper look at what is required to integrate code
signing into the OpenOffice build and release process. As you probably know
operating systems, especially Windows and MacOS, are now checking for
digital signatures and by default prevent users from installing programs
that
Welcome, please mention your skillset and we can provide ideas on
where in OO would you feel more confortable.
On 4/2/13, Sand Wen wrote:
> Hey guys, I have learned some of the OOo history and the OOo Architecture,
> and I think maybe I can do something for OpenOffice, hope getting more
> informa
Hi,
I am a little bit annoyed about the often bad researched articles about
OpenOffice or at least articles spreading wrong information about
OpenOffice. I don't know exactly why authors do such a poor job with
their research of correct information where it is so easy on the other
hand to get firs
On 3 April 2013 10:22, Pavel Janík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://tmp.janik.cz/AO/binfilter-removal.diff
>
> This is the first attempt to remove module binfilter. To add more to this,
> we should remove directories binfilter and scp2/source/binfilter.
>
+1 to remove directories,
Are there other direct
Hi,
http://tmp.janik.cz/AO/binfilter-removal.diff
This is the first attempt to remove module binfilter. To add more to this, we
should remove directories binfilter and scp2/source/binfilter.
--
Pavel Janík
-
To unsubscribe,
Thank you for your patience this morning,
The VM wiki VM has been moved to another VM host, and was down for less then 20
minutes in total. Jan has said in IRC it looks fine, if you spot any issues
please let us know in the usual way.
Cheers,
Tony
--
Tony
On 3 April 2013 01:27, RGB ES wrote:
> 2013/3/29 Ariel Constenla-Haile
>
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:27:30PM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
> > > If you look at this page
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/ES/Manuales/GuiaAOO/TemasAvanzados/Macros/StarBasic/TrabajandoConCalc/FuncionesPer
73 matches
Mail list logo