Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
(RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the
iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:56:31 +0200
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like
> to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
> members.
>
>[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
>[ ] 0 Don't
Hi,
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
Thanks,
Sokhem
On 03-Apr-14 3:09 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:56:31 +0200
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like
to provide a release that is supported
2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> > Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> >> 2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
> >>
> >>> Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> >>>
> >>> 2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (O
On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> 2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt :
>
>> On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>> Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
> Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>
>> 2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
>>
>>> Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>
>>> 2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 P
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
--
Best Regards,
Steve Yin
2014-04-03 13:09 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir :
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> > Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> >
> >> 2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
> >>
> >>> Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> >>>
> >>> 2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 7:59 PM
To: secur...@openoffice.apache.org; Bob Crook
Subject: Re: windows xp and open office
Hi Bob,
This email address is only for reporting security vulnerabilities.
For general questions a
+1
powered by android
On Apr 3, 2014 2:57 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
> 2 major improvements. It's the
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Bob Crook wrote:
>
>
.
.
.
at 5:23 PM, Bob Crook wrote:
>> How secure will open office be with Windows XP after Microsoft stops
>> supporting? I have been using Office 2003 with Win XP ser pack 3
>>
>>
Thanks for moving this to the public list. I think this is
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
en_GB
Regards,
Stuart
--
Stuart Swales
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On 2014-04-03, at 03:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
+1
-louis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
I have tested the office now for 2 days, verified some issues, build it
from scratch based on the src release. It looks good to me and I give my
+1 for the final go ;-)
I will be offline for the next 3 days but will count the votes in time.
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi,
FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a firs
On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> fur
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi,
FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had
On 4/3/14 5:02 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>> On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> Hi Jürgen,
>>>
>>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi,
FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
Last week I proposed a final schedule for our u
Is there anyone that is able to help me with this?
-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 3:34 PM
To: 'Stephan Bergmann'
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org; michael.me...@suse.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
I now understand wha
ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
whole mechanism is
On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>
> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
> that will allow us for example to upgr
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
I have not been very involved in this release but I am very glad with
the progress made. The accessibility support, in particular, is key for
many users that would otherwise have very limited access to information.
Huge congratulations to
On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>
>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future pa
As you may have seen in another thread, we have to rebuild the Windows
binaries. This is necessary to be able to install a 4.1 full
installation set over an already installed 4.0.1. At the moment you get
a dialog with text "another version of this product is already
installed"and then the ins
Thanks for responding. This is an extension that I build using the OpenOffice
Netbeans module.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice_NetBeans_Integration#Download_and_Installation
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 9:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Steele, Raymond wrote:
> Is there anyone that is able to help me with this?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steele, Raymond
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 3:34 PM
> To: 'Stephan Bergmann'
> Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org; michael.me...@suse.com
> Subject: R
Am 04/03/2014 02:27 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-03 13:09 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
20
2014-04-03 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) :
> Am 04/03/2014 02:27 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>
> 2014-04-03 13:09 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00
Am 04/03/2014 01:09 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
Am
Am 04/03/2014 12:57 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt:
On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo):
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM,
2014-04-03 21:44 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) :
> Am 04/03/2014 12:57 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>
> On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
>>
>>> 2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt:
>>>
>>> On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppi
I am not convinced the issue is with the extension. I created another simple
extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash. I don't know
where to go from here.
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 9:35 AM
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0
Thanks for hard working from all of you
Clarence
2014-04-03 15:56 GMT+08:00 Jürgen Schmidt :
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is
On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>>
>>> I have built with
It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the w
No problem found.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin wrote:
> It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >> On
Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US.
>From testing perspective:
1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical sc
37 matches
Mail list logo
