RE: Editing Download page

+1 Looks great. Ship it! - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 15:51 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Editing Download page > > > > On 07/22/2016 03:49 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 07/22/2016 10:14 PM, s

Re: Clean up on main page for www.openoffice.org

On 07/22/2016 03:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 07/23/2016 12:47 AM, schrieb kaysch...@apache.org: >> Is there any problem with removing VERY old entries from: >> http://www.openoffice.org/ >> >> We still have references to events in 2014, 2013 that I feel should be >> removed now. >> >> Also, in the

Re: Editing Download page

On 07/22/2016 03:49 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 07/22/2016 10:14 PM, schrieb Marcus: >> Am 07/22/2016 08:35 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> [...] >>> >>> I didn't interpret it as a commitment to do the changes, and I am in a >>> Just Do It mood this week. If you can do the changes, great. > > OK,

Re: Clean up on main page for www.openoffice.org

Am 07/23/2016 12:47 AM, schrieb kaysch...@apache.org: Is there any problem with removing VERY old entries from: http://www.openoffice.org/ We still have references to events in 2014, 2013 that I feel should be removed now. Also, in the past, we've done a good job of advertising for ApacheCon. T

Re: Editing Download page

Am 07/22/2016 10:14 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 07/22/2016 08:35 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: [...] I didn't interpret it as a commitment to do the changes, and I am in a Just Do It mood this week. If you can do the changes, great. OK, I don't want to slow you down. ;-) Here is a first test ver

Clean up on main page for www.openoffice.org

Is there any problem with removing VERY old entries from: http://www.openoffice.org/ We still have references to events in 2014, 2013 that I feel should be removed now. Also, in the past, we've done a good job of advertising for ApacheCon. There is an upcoming ApacheCon EU in Seville, Spain in No

Re: Editing Download page

Am 07/22/2016 08:35 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 7/22/2016 11:05 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 07/22/2016 07:45 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I am trying to edit www.openoffice.org/download/ to add a box for recruiting developers. It seems to be a rather complicated page, with internationalization

Re: Buildbots update

On 22 Jul, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, > openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and > openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while openoffice-linux32-snapshot > is only temporarily breaking due to SourceForge issues. I've a

RE: Editing Download page

There is also the prospect of using the Apache OpenOffice blog and the announce@ oo.a.o list as a kind of one-time way to indicate a drive for contributors. There was such an effort previously for QA support, . It is also informative to review these from t

Re: Editing Download page

On 7/22/2016 11:05 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 07/22/2016 07:45 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I am trying to edit www.openoffice.org/download/ to add a box for recruiting developers. It seems to be a rather complicated page, with internationalization. yes, to give the L10n groups the possibility to

Re: Editing Download page

Am 07/22/2016 07:45 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I am trying to edit www.openoffice.org/download/ to add a box for recruiting developers. It seems to be a rather complicated page, with internationalization. yes, to give the L10n groups the possibility to translate their webpages. But only th

Editing Download page

I am trying to edit www.openoffice.org/download/ to add a box for recruiting developers. It seems to be a rather complicated page, with internationalization. If anyone is familiar with how to edit it, and has time to help me, please reply.

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

The Windows build performance regression first occurs in r1735004, which takes 676 minutes to build compared to 330 minutes in the commit just before it. Only wall clock time increases, "user" and "system" times remain the same. 4 patches from branches/gbuild were merged in that commit. 3 of them

RE: Donations?

I haven't been following that either. I am not certain it is settled. I have the sense that this is not about small donations. I should also say that "earmarked" is the actual term I've seen, not "on-account," although that is probably not a material difference. - Dennis > -Original Mess

Re: Buildbots update

Am 07/22/2016 09:09 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while openoffice-linux32-snapshot is only temporarily breaking due to SourceForge issue

Re: Donations?

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: It happens there are some funds "on-account" at the ASF that are available to OpenOffice. Those arrived in an unusual manner in the early history of the project. That exception is unlikely to repeat. Not so unlikely. Targeted donations are among the (many) new feat

Re: Buildbots update

On 7/22/2016 12:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: ... I'll experiment a lot more over the weekend, but right now I think the problem could be that the buildbot runs VSVARS.BAT to set up the Visual Studio environment, which (presumably) contains the evil DEVENV that break the build and locks files wh

Re: Buildbots update

I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while openoffice-linux32-snapshot is only temporarily breaking due to SourceForge issues. I've also made some interesting discoveries about

Re: spell check

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:11:28 +1000 kevin john wrote: > Your spell check does not work this is not the first time I had this problem > don’t ask me to fix this its to hard to complicated . > > Regards > Kevin If you are using Windows close OpenOffice and the Quickstarter. Open File Explorer. C