Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with Gradle. Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under ext_sources? On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who do

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-11 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have to go hunting for anything and digging around in operating-system locations. You should be able to go through the procedure that uses the automated steps pretty easily. It is very impor

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Marcus
Am 08/11/2016 09:50 PM, schrieb Kay sch...@apache.org: On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: [top posting] I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" i

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > > On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> [top posting] >>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, >>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructi

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Kay Schenk wrote: My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these. Guidelines recommend SHA256. But it should not be difficult for you to get a sha256sum binary or a generic shasum binary to run as "shasum -a256 FILENAME". Re

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Kay sch...@apache.org
On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > > On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> [top posting] >> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, >> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual >> HOTFIX page, we need to have ju

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Kay Schenk
On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use --without-junit

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Kay sch...@apache.org
On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > [top posting] > I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, > Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual > HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips > that simply says -- "Un

Re: Planning for emergency releases

2016-08-11 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 8/11/2016 10:45 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/10/2016 12:25 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote: ... we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and then shortend. [1] http

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

2016-08-11 Thread Marcus
Am 08/10/2016 05:03 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Wind

Re: Planning for emergency releases

2016-08-11 Thread Marcus
Am 08/10/2016 12:25 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote: ... we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and then shortend. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> Hi >> >> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use >> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too >> old. This is unlikely to change, as the

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too > old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu > 10.04 which doesn't have newer

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use > > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being > too > > old. This i

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Kay sch...@apache.org
On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too > old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu > 10.04 which does

Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

2016-08-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu 10.04 which doesn't have newer versions of Junit available in apt. This is p