Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with
Gradle.
Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under
ext_sources?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic
wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who do
BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE
The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have to go hunting for
anything and digging around in operating-system locations.
You should be able to go through the procedure that uses the automated steps
pretty easily.
It is very impor
Am 08/11/2016 09:50 PM, schrieb Kay sch...@apache.org:
On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
[top posting]
I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" i
On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> [top posting]
>>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
>>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructi
Kay Schenk wrote:
My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use
sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these.
Guidelines recommend SHA256. But it should not be difficult for you to
get a sha256sum binary or a generic shasum binary to run as "shasum
-a256 FILENAME".
Re
On 11 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see
On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
>
> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> [top posting]
>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
>> HOTFIX page, we need to have ju
On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
--without-junit
On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> [top posting]
> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
> HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips
> that simply says -- "Un
On 8/11/2016 10:45 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08/10/2016 12:25 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote:
...
we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full
release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and
then shortend.
[1]
http
Am 08/10/2016 05:03 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Wind
Am 08/10/2016 12:25 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote:
...
we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full
release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and
then shortend.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa
On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
>> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
>> old. This is unlikely to change, as the
On 11 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
> old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu
> 10.04 which doesn't have newer
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org
wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
> > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being
> too
> > old. This i
On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
> old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu
> 10.04 which does
Hi
If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
--without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu
10.04 which doesn't have newer versions of Junit available in apt.
This is p
17 matches
Mail list logo
