RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Thanks for the checking, Marcus. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Am

[PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage

As we have now the patched library file and Readme for all platforms, IMHO not much more is needed to go public with the hotfix. Therefore I've created a draft version of the hotfix download webpage: http://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1/hotfix.html Please review and

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/13/2016 10:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/13/2016 09:46 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/13/2016 06:24 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote: Here are my tests: Linux 32-bit: - ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed - MD5, SHA1 are OK [1] - ZIP ASC is OK (signature

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/13/2016 09:46 AM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/13/2016 06:24 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >> On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote: >>> Here are my tests: >>> >>> Linux 32-bit: >>> >>> - ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed >>> - MD5, SHA1 are OK [1] >>> - ZIP ASC is OK (signature from Kay Schenk)

Re: Review of the 4.1.2-patch1 MacOSX.README.txt file

Am 08/13/2016 09:07 PM, schrieb William L. Anderson: On Aug 13, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/13/2016 08:47 PM, schrieb William L. Anderson: Marcus: results included inline below. Let me know if you need more information. /WLA thats great. To have it equal

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/12/2016 06:07 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have to go hunting for anything and digging around in operating-system locations. You should be able to go through the procedure that

Re: Review of the 4.1.2-patch1 MacOSX.README.txt file

Am 08/13/2016 08:47 PM, schrieb William L. Anderson: Marcus: results included inline below. Let me know if you need more information. /WLA thats great. To have it equal to the other library files, can you please provide me additionally also the time stamp of the file. It will be in the

Re: Review of the 4.1.2-patch1 MacOSX.README.txt file

Marcus: results included inline below. Let me know if you need more information. /WLA > On Aug 13, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 08/09/2016 10:41 PM, schrieb Marcus: >> Am 08/08/2016 09:54 PM, schrieb William L. Anderson: >>> Kay, I have attached a ".txt" file

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/13/2016 06:24 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote: Here are my tests: Linux 32-bit: - ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed - MD5, SHA1 are OK [1] - ZIP ASC is OK (signature from Kay Schenk) - Library ASC is OK (signature from Ariel Constenla-Haile) Linux

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/13/2016 07:00 AM, Marcus wrote: > Here are my tests: > > Linux 32-bit: > > - ZIP file is OK and can be uncompressed > - MD5, SHA1 are OK [1] > - ZIP ASC is OK (signature from Kay Schenk) > - Library ASC is OK (signature from Ariel Constenla-Haile) > > Linux 64-bit: > > - ZIP file is OK

Re: Review of the 4.1.2-patch1 MacOSX.README.txt file

Am 08/09/2016 10:41 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 08/08/2016 09:54 PM, schrieb William L. Anderson: Kay, I have attached a ".txt" file that incorporates the changes suggested. Two items are *not* included. thanks. This is very much appreciated. We will include your text into the Readme file soon.