Am 02.10.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> On 10/1/2016 2:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> Is this a good time to rename
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/? It should
>> change to "4.1.3-rc1" before final testing and vote.
>
> Since I really want to do this when
Done.
On 10/1/2016 2:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Is this a good time to rename
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/? It should
change to "4.1.3-rc1" before final testing and vote.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On 10/1/2016 2:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Is this a good time to rename
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/? It should
change to "4.1.3-rc1" before final testing and vote.
Since I really want to do this when the most involved people are not
very active, I'm going to w
Is this a good time to rename
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/? It should
change to "4.1.3-rc1" before final testing and vote.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For addition
Andrea Pescetti has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127148: Script to build source package skips
main/testgraphical/references
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127148
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Pescetti ---
I wanted to request blocker status, not to grant it... Flag modified
a
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
For 4.1.3, I am in "Don't rock the boat" mode. Anything that gets us to
release sooner is good. It looks as though you already have the packages
we need, so please go ahead and SVN them.
OK. Committed to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/source/
Th
Andrea Pescetti has granted 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127148: Script to build source package skips
main/testgraphical/references
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127148
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Pescetti ---
Fixed in trunk. Can be considered for the 4.1.4 source packaging.
-
John D'Orazio schreef op 01-10-2016 1:10:
I still don't quite get what this phrase is trying to express, and it
really sounds like Yoda to me too. I would certainly try to rephrase it
so
it flows better. My understanding is that this is what it's trying to
get
across:
"You will often find in
On 10/1/2016 9:24 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The idea is to start from a clean check-out, not configured, move the
LICENSE, NOTICE, and README files, and delete what is not needed. "what
is not needed" should be a relatively short list, including the .svn
files and als
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The idea is to start from a clean check-out, not configured, move the
LICENSE, NOTICE, and README files, and delete what is not needed. "what
is not needed" should be a relatively short list, including the .svn
files and also ext_sources.
While I would have gone for Bas
On Sat, 1 Oct 2016 06:32:25 -0700
Kirk Fraser wrote:
> Rory,
>
> Thanks but the documentation for Plume says it is definitely not usable
> (yet) and after download I agree. I will look at your suggestions further
> but I'm currently thinking Scrivner is the way to go even though it costs
> afte
Rory,
Thanks but the documentation for Plume says it is definitely not usable
(yet) and after download I agree. I will look at your suggestions further
but I'm currently thinking Scrivner is the way to go even though it costs
after 30 days. My other idea is to compose in several Notepad files the
On 10/1/2016 4:38 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:34:48PM +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote:
Instead of removing the .svn dirs/files with a script, use the built in 'svn
export' which exports the
checkout without all the .svn dirs/files.
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:34:48PM +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Instead of removing the .svn dirs/files with a script, use the built in 'svn
> export' which exports the
> checkout without all the .svn dirs/files.
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.ref.svn.c.export.html
I guess that t
14 matches
Mail list logo