On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately.
> I have a few questions:
>
> 1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests
> provide vs.functionality?
>
> 2. Is there yet a place to list
Hi -
The new repository is https://GitHub.com/Apache/OpenOffice-org
The next steps are to finish the templates.
(Wednesday)
(1) Breadcrumbs
(2) Branding/Navigation adjustments per directory
(Thursday)
(3) Staging / Test server with Infra help
(Friday)
(4) Directory migration script
(5)
Hi Andrea,
On 10/27/20 5:58 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which
I don't think we use anymore
Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
recent era (Apache), so it should
Hi,
Confirmed: «AOO_4.1.8_test15» in Debian 9, 64 bits, don't show error messages.
Regards,
Delio.
- Mensaje original -
De: "Delio Orozco Gonzalez"
Para: "dev"
Enviados: Martes, 27 de Octubre 2020 17:08:07
Asunto: Re: Test to Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US-v2
What git migration?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>> Am 27.10.20 um 23:22 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Hi -
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> Dave Fisher wrote:
I will be doing the
Possible... esp w/ raptor that saw a huge bump from 1.x to 2.x...
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 6:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>>
Am 27.10.20 um 23:22 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that metrics
needs a specific discussion.
Initially I’ll comment this out.
Do I
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Dave Fisher wrote:
>> I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that
>> metrics needs a specific discussion.
>> Initially I’ll comment this out.
>
> Do I understand well that there is
Maybe the following link helps?
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
Kay did migrate stuff in 2018 I think. Maybe went a bit unnoticed?
Is this what the Server had contained?
Am 27.10.20 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is
Hi Andrea,
Am 27.10.20 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
>> Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which
>> I don't think we use anymore
>
> Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
> recent era (Apache), so
Dave Fisher wrote:
I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that metrics
needs a specific discussion.
Initially I’ll comment this out.
Do I understand well that there is no technical reason whatsoever to get
rid of Google Analytics, and that the discussion is purely
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which I don't
think we use anymore
Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
recent era (Apache), so it should serve as a lesson: Adfinis contributed
a server, got
Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, configure did
the "right thing". So if something is causing configure to make a different
decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new stuff that the RDF stuff
does. The problem is with the patch or how it is working...
In
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread,
> what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the
> build server, which is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x
> releases, nor with the configure and build parameters
For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread, what we
have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the build server, which
is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x releases, nor with the configure
and build parameters (also unchanged from previous). It is
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>>
>> assuming that this is good, it
Hello everyone:
AOO_4.1.8_test15 in Debian 10 (64 bits) don't show error messages. I suposse
that in Debian 9 neither. I confirm more later.
Regards,
Delio.
- Mensaje original -
De: "Delio Orozco Gonzalez"
Para: "dev"
Enviados: Lunes, 26 de Octubre 2020 19:06:58
Asunto: Re: Test to
Hi Carl,
The matching thing in groovy was a bit of a pain, but it works now. Let me know
if you have any suggestions.
Next steps are in skeleton.gsp
(1) Breadcrumbs.
(2) Branding, and navigator overrides.
Plus some settings work.
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 1:21 PM, w...@apache.org
Hi Kent
Welcome to Apache OpenOffice.
One of the major tasks we need Python development for at the moment is to
upgrade OpenOffice from Python 2 to 3. This is unfortunately quite
difficult, as we not only have to port Python code, but possibly C code
too, deal with patching, testing and
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>
> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose
> with
>
>
Hi Keith,
Am 27.10.20 um 18:52 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 10/26/2020 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Joost,
>>
>> Am 26.10.20 um 13:19 schrieb Joost Andrae:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> I've just tried it out against a different MediaWiki and I can confirm
>>> it is running well !
>>
On 10/26/2020 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Joost,
>
> Am 26.10.20 um 13:19 schrieb Joost Andrae:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> I've just tried it out against a different MediaWiki and I can confirm
>> it is running well !
>
> Thanks, that's great news!
>
> @Keith: Is this useful for your
As expected:
e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27 is the first bad commit
commit e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
Author: truckman
Date: Fri Aug 26 07:13:14 2016 +
Upgrade bundled raptor from raptor-1.4.18 to raptor2-2.0.15 to get the
fix for CVE-2012-0037. It is not
No problems in test15 for me!
Matthias
Am 27.10.20 um 17:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test15, likely the final test of the git bisect series, is now available.
>
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>>
test15
Debian 10 64bits
No error messages to open or save odt and ods files
test15, likely the final test of the git bisect series, is now available.
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>
>
>
Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose with
Hi Jim,
No error messages on opening and saving on Ubuntu 16.04.
Am 27.10.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test14 is ready for testing!
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional
test14
Debian 10 64bits
No error messages to open or save odt and ods files
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> test14 is ready for testing!
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Do we have the capability to do such migration? If the LO patches are under
MPL, then we can't use them.
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:19 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around the
> wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use.
>
test14 is ready for testing!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hi Peter,
Am 27.10.20 um 08:19 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around
> the wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use.
That would be great!
I have come to the conclusion, that we should offer our Wiki Publisher
on extensions.o.o
I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around
the wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use.
Am 26.10.20 um 15:52 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Joost,
Am 26.10.20 um 13:19 schrieb Joost Andrae:
Hi Matthias,
I've just tried it out against a different
34 matches
Mail list logo
