Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-30 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/25/2013 08:47 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave Fisher >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 0

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-25 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/25/2013 08:47 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/24/2013 07:07 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI wrote: On

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-25 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> >> > Am 07/24/2013 07:07 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI wrote: >> >>> On 24 July 2013 18:34, R

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-25 Thread Kay Schenk
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > > Am 07/24/2013 07:07 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI wrote: > >>> On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir wrote: > >>> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/24/2013 07:07 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI wrote: >>> On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > I have followed the discussion

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/24/2013 07:07 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI wrote: On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote: Hi. I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not wanted changed in our important artifacts

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote: Hi. I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not wanted changed in our important artifacts happen. I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc. cannot be changed by accident. I be

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, janI wrote: > On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote: >> > Hi. >> > >> > I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not >> > wanted changed in our important artifacts happen. >> > >> > I th

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread janI
On 24 July 2013 18:34, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not > > wanted changed in our important artifacts happen. > > > > I think it is important, that items like our logos, release

Re: [DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote: > Hi. > > I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not > wanted changed in our important artifacts happen. > > I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc. > cannot be changed by accident. I believe i

[DISCUSS] added security to avoid changes in artifacts.

2013-07-24 Thread janI
Hi. I have followed the discussions in here, and have seen a number of not wanted changed in our important artifacts happen. I think it is important, that items like our logos, release notes etc. cannot be changed by accident. I believe it happens by accident and that could avoided with a simple