On 03/18/2016 08:04 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/18/2016 03:18 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>> When I was working I gave up some of my freedom to do what
>> I wanted in
>> exchange for being paid to do what other people told me.
>>
>> I retired when I had accumulated enough investments that
>> the
Not only it is possible to compel, it is imperative for a viable project.
As Stalin once said, "When there's a person, there's a problem." :)
Lack of management hierarchy just can't work in the long run.
The history of OpenOffice also shows its peak was when an organization with
a clear command str
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> When I was working I gave up some of my freedom to do what I wanted in
> exchange for being paid to do what other people told me.
>
> We all do...
> I retired when I had accumulated enough investments that the financial
> improvement f
Am 03/18/2016 03:18 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
When I was working I gave up some of my freedom to do what I wanted in
exchange for being paid to do what other people told me.
I retired when I had accumulated enough investments that the financial
improvement from the money Sun was paying me n
Am 03/17/2016 09:00 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
Hello;
I don't know (or care) what donaldupre meant by that "holacracy"
thing but the ASF does have clear governance structures.
Concerning a Release Manager I found this:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#release_manager
"The com
I am really, really curious. How would you recommend the hypothetical
AOO management hierarchy go about compelling me to do anything?
On 3/17/2016 10:41 AM, donaldupre . wrote:
Not only it is possible to compel, it is imperative for a viable project.
As Stalin once said, "When there's a person,
When I was working I gave up some of my freedom to do what I wanted in
exchange for being paid to do what other people told me.
I retired when I had accumulated enough investments that the financial
improvement from the money Sun was paying me no longer outweighed the
benefit of being able to dec
Technically, we do not have a management hierarchy on Apache projects, although
there are some rather limited governance roles. There can be self-organizing
*informal* teams that are basically people working together for some common
within-project purpose and those are fluid and definitely self
In the same way management in your professional experience handled
disagreement, disrespect, waste, inefficiency etc. that sometimes happen
when people work together.
You did offer to learn to be a release manager, it means that some sort of
"management" is needed?
How someone here suggested making
I have offered, on the PMC mailing list, to learn to be a release
manager if necessary or desirable. The more people we have who can do a
role, the better the chances of someone being available when needed.
However, I would have to function as keeper-of-the-checklist, and depend
on everyone doi
7;t be at the ASF.
- Dennis
> -Original Message-
> From: donaldupre . [mailto:donaldu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 05:20
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AOO Governance (was RE: Next release and gbuild)
>
> In the same way management in y
Hello;
I don't know (or care) what donaldupre meant by that "holacracy"
thing but the ASF does have clear governance structures.
Concerning a Release Manager I found this:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#release_manager
"The common practice at Apache is for a single individua
12 matches
Mail list logo
