Yep... We needed to update our community build server from CentOS5 to CentOS7
due to gstreamer. There was talk about working around that, but it never came
to fruition. One option is that we provide 2 sets of community builds for
Linux: one on CentOS5 w/o gstreamer and one built on CentOS7 w/
On 20 Sep, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Am 20.09.20 um 20:16 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years,
and at least I would like to go with the
On 20 Sep, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years,
>>> and at least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick
>>> to the old code
Am 20.09.20 um 20:16 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years, and at
least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick to the old code for
long
> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years, and at
>> least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick to the old code
>> for long time it will make maintenance
Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years, and
at least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick to the
old code for long time it will make maintenance or development more
difficuilt.
yes, that's why I wrote:
Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years, and
at least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick to the
old code for long time it will make maintenance or development more
difficuilt.
Am 17.09.20 um 23:57 schrieb Marcus:
Am 17.09.20 um 21:15 schrieb
Am 17.09.20 um 21:15 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Sep 17, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 17.09.20 um 15:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Here is my thought.
AOO exists to serve a large segment of the "I need office software" community
which is, IMO at least, dis-served. Not everyone can afford
Hi Dave,
Am 17.09.20 um 21:15 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 17, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 17.09.20 um 15:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Here is my thought.
>>> AOO exists to serve a large segment of the "I need office software"
>>> community which is,
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 17, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 17.09.20 um 15:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Here is my thought.
>> AOO exists to serve a large segment of the "I need office software"
>> community which is, IMO at least, dis-served. Not everyone can afford the
>>
Am 17.09.20 um 15:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Here is my thought.
AOO exists to serve a large segment of the "I need office software" community
which is, IMO at least, dis-served. Not everyone can afford the latest and greatest PC,
with the latest version of the OS, and lots of RAM and disk.
Here is my thought.
AOO exists to serve a large segment of the "I need office software" community
which is, IMO at least, dis-served. Not everyone can afford the latest and
greatest PC, with the latest version of the OS, and lots of RAM and disk. This
is especially true in developing
Hi -
The 4.1,X line of releases should remain focused on MacOSX Lion 10.7.
Which version should we target for 4.2.0 and trunk?
Some facts:
(1) The minimum version of MacOSX you can get easily is Yosemite 10.10.
This runs on these machines. [1] The era is 2007-2009.
(2) Catalina 10.15 is
13 matches
Mail list logo
