Re: Nightly Builds

red to a since date. If we use the >> last build date then we can check if there are entries. >> Maybe some other switches would help. >> >> Am 21. Januar 2023 15:03:02 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel >> : >>> Hi Gavin, >>> >>> Am 21.01.23 um 13:33

Re: Nightly Builds

Hi all > On 01/26/2023 4:24 PM WET Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Four weeks are a good period to have archived if a regression occurs. > > > > > No. For old regressions, or to discover old fixes, we ideally want a build > from every month in AOO's history. I agree with both. Four weeks is a good

Re: Nightly Builds

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 3:14 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > Four weeks are a good period to have archived if a regression occurs. > > No. For old regressions, or to discover old fixes, we ideally want a build from every month in AOO's history.

Re: Nightly Builds

then we can check if there are entries. Maybe some other switches would help. Am 21. Januar 2023 15:03:02 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : Hi Gavin, Am 21.01.23 um 13:33 schrieb Gavin McDonald: Hi All, The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up much unnecessary disk

Re: Nightly Builds

: Hi Gavin, Am 21.01.23 um 13:33 schrieb Gavin McDonald: Hi All, The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up much unnecessary disk space on the nightlies.apache.org server. Currently Openoffice alone is using more than 1TB - all due to these nightly builds. Over 600GB

Re: Nightly Builds

chrieb Matthias Seidel > : >> Hi Gavin, >> >> Am 21.01.23 um 13:33 schrieb Gavin McDonald: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up >>> much unnecessary >>> disk space on the night

Re: Nightly Builds

>> Hi All, >> >> The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up >> much unnecessary >> disk space on the nightlies.apache.org server. >> >> Currently Openoffice alone is using more than 1TB - all due to these >> nightly bui

Re: Nightly Builds

Hi Gavin, Am 21.01.23 um 13:33 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > Hi All, > > The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up > much unnecessary > disk space on the nightlies.apache.org server. > > Currently Openoffice alone is using more than 1TB - all d

Re: Nightly Builds

Hi Rory, Am 21.01.23 um 14:18 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:13:54 +0100 > Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Rory, >> >> Am 21.01.23 um 13:52 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: >>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 13:33:38 +0100 >>> Gavin McDonald wrote:

Re: Nightly Builds

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:13:54 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Rory, > > Am 21.01.23 um 13:52 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 13:33:38 +0100 > > Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> The nightly builds at https

Re: Nightly Builds

Hi Rory, Am 21.01.23 um 13:52 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 13:33:38 +0100 > Gavin McDonald wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up >> much unnecessary >> disk space on the night

Re: Nightly Builds

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 13:33:38 +0100 Gavin McDonald wrote: > Hi All, > > The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up > much unnecessary > disk space on the nightlies.apache.org server. > > Currently Openoffice alone is using more than 1TB - all d

Nightly Builds

Hi All, The nightly builds at https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/58 are using up much unnecessary disk space on the nightlies.apache.org server. Currently Openoffice alone is using more than 1TB - all due to these nightly builds. Over 600GB are the linux64 snapshots and the rest are the linsnap

Re: 404 error on OpenOffice daily/nightly builds and snapshots

Hi Marcus, Am 25.08.22 um 20:43 schrieb Marcus: > Am 25.08.22 um 16:42 schrieb Bidouille: >> This page: https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html >> All hyperlinks are wrong for Windows system >> >> Thanks to fix it :-) > > @Matthias: > Even from here I don't see any Windows builds: >

Re: 404 error on OpenOffice daily/nightly builds and snapshots

Am 25.08.22 um 16:42 schrieb Bidouille: This page: https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html All hyperlinks are wrong for Windows system Thanks to fix it :-) @Matthias: Even from here I don't see any Windows builds: https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/ When you give me a

404 error on OpenOffice daily/nightly builds and snapshots

This page: https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html All hyperlinks are wrong for Windows system Thanks to fix it :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: "Nightly Builds" location

t kind of > information user shall see at the target page. > "Not Found. The requested URL was not found on this server." is hardly > user-friendly. > > Regards, > > Czesław > > > > > > > Am Di., 12. Mai 2020 um 17:52 Uhr s

Re: "Nightly Builds" location

this server." is hardly user-friendly. Regards, Czesław Am Di., 12. Mai 2020 um 17:52 Uhr schrieb Pedro Lino : > Hi Dave > > > It should be made clear that nightly builds are not required and not > advertised. The location and frequency is up to the project and

Re: "Nightly Builds" location

Hi Dave > It should be made clear that nightly builds are not required and not > advertised. The location and frequency is up to the project and is found by > asking on a project’s dev list. And yet if a path is mentioned in the "ASF policy on software releases", that

Re: "Nightly Builds" location

It should be made clear that nightly builds are not required and not advertised. The location and frequency is up to the project and is found by asking on a project’s dev list. See Jim and Matthias’s discussion about weekly builds. Best Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2

Re: "Nightly Builds" location

Hi, Thanks for explanation. I'll report this issue. Let me/us hope it is not "a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma". ;‑) Best regards, Czesław Am Di., 12. Mai 2020 um 16:02 Uhr schrieb Pedro Lino : > Hi Czeslaw > > > In case of "Nightly Builds":

Re: "Nightly Builds" location

Hi Czeslaw > In case of "Nightly Builds": > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#build-directories > their location is given as follows: people.apache.org/builds > > It doesn't work ("Not Found. "The requested URL was not found on this > server.

"Nightly Builds" location

Hi, During a vibrant discussion on "macOS and AOO42X" subject, Keith N. McKenna on 4 May (2020/05/04) pointed out the Release Policy as stated at: http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#publication In case of "Nightly Builds": http://www.apache.org/legal/relea

Re: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:04:27 -0800 Kay Schenk wrote: > OK, I will see if can get a reboot on the win7 buildbot. > > And we will investigate the other problem in > sal/qa/osl/mutex/osl_Mutex.cxx you mention. > > Are you currently building on Windows? Thank you for looking into the win buildbot. I'm

Re: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

On 12/15/2015 03:05 AM, j.nitsc...@ok.de wrote: > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> Now that the aoo-win7 buildbot is running and still failing (with an >> exception), I have two kinds of observations. A. The Exception and >> Failure itself. See >>

Re: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

-- www.Ok.de - die kostenlose E-Mail Adresse - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Now that the aoo-win7 buildbot is running and still failing (with an > exception), I have two kinds of observations. A. The Exception and > Failure itself. See > and the bootstrap > exception information from stdio,

RE: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

rying out Windows builds and perhaps then being able to understand the buildbot situation.) - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2015 10:21 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RISK?]

Re: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

> Now that the aoo-win7 buildbot is running and still failing (with an > exception), I have two kinds of observations. A. The Exception and > Failure itself. See > and the bootstrap > exception information from stdio, err.txt, and err.html).

Re: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

/openofficeorg.conf > > Does the configuration for Windows need to be changed in some way? > > We can fix buildbot configurations but not resource problems with > the buildbots. > > >> >> >>> -Original Message- From: Pedro Lino >>>

Re: [RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

not resource problems with the buildbots. > > >> -Original Message- From: Pedro Lino >> [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 >> 03:58 To: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Daily/Nightly >> builds for Windows? >> >> Hi

[RISK?] FW: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows?

015 03:58 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Daily/Nightly builds for Windows? > > Hi all > > Now that 4.1.2 is out and development is again active, I believe it > would > be good to have the Apache OpenOffice buildbots releasing daily binaries > for Windows as

Re: build break in sw = two nightly builds now switched to the release branch

is needed. I temporarily switched the Linux32 and the Windows nightly builds to our release branch for AOO 4.1.1. Till the release this switch should help our QA efforts and the more regular monitoring of the branch will also detect build problems faster. The changes are already active, but the next

RPM Nightly builds?

Hi I wonder where can I get the RPM nigthly builds/snapshots, unfortunately I only see deb files on this page: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#linux32 -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614

Re: RPM Nightly builds?

2 corrections: - I meant the snapshots not the nightly build - The nightly build tar is giving me an error with: tar: Cannot connect to Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz_2013-09-28_04: resolve failed On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org

Re: RPM Nightly builds?

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: 2 corrections: - I meant the snapshots not the nightly build - The nightly build tar is giving me an error with: tar: Cannot connect to Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz_2013-09-28_04: resolve

Working with nightly builds parallel to standard releases

Hi is there any tutorial on working with parallel builds of OpenOffice? Before there was the ooo-dev/ and the OpenOffice3/ folders, I wonder if the nightly builds work the same way... Regards. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org

Re: Working with nightly builds parallel to standard releases

of OpenOffice? Before there was the ooo-dev/ and the OpenOffice3/ folders, I wonder if the nightly builds work the same way... Regards. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org

Re: Working with nightly builds parallel to standard releases

On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: BTW trying to untar it, it spew some error: tar -xzvf Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz_2013-03-12_04\:29\:29_1455404.tar.gz tar (child): Cannot connect to Looks like it thinks it is a hostname. Use tar

Nightly Builds

Hello where can I get an actual nightly build for testing for a 64 bit Linux-System (favoured DEBs) http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#linux64 gives a 404 Kind regards Mechtilde signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Nightly Builds

Sorry for the noise, Now it works Mechtilde Am 17.02.2013 09:38, schrieb Mechtilde: Hello where can I get an actual nightly build for testing for a 64 bit Linux-System (favoured DEBs) http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#linux64 gives a 404 Kind regards Mechtilde