On 19/02/15 22:38, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this
conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
[Andrea] The page provides
For what it's worth (and I'm sure there are some on this list who believe it is
worth very little), I didn't and don't like the GPL-bashing verbiage, precisely
because it is not consistent with ASF statements and leaves ASF open to the
kind of criticism Bradley Kuhn has leveled.
The page was
I know we are waiting on Andrea's rewrite, but I would ask why bother to
rewrite.
Here are three reasons why the page should be removed from all language
versions and not just hidden.
(1) How does the PMC even know what this carefully nuanced page even says in
another language like Chinese,
Am 02/20/2015 11:55 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
I know we are waiting on Andrea's rewrite, but I would ask why bother to
rewrite.
Here are three reasons why the page should be removed from all language
versions and not just hidden.
(1) How does the PMC even know what this carefully nuanced page
I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim maneuver
is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page ad lib. I
haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet. If that stays, it
needs to ripple through the translations too.
If I have to
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this
conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
[Andrea] The page provides relevant information in a bad way. It is by
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation
earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
OK, it seems your offer good lost as the topic got more intensive today.
At least this applies to me. So, sorry from myside.
When the forecast of the vote still remains then you can still do the
rework of the webpage. At least this work should be not for nothing.
Marcus
Am 02/19/2015
On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation
earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like
