Re: Review Board

2013-03-10 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI wrote: > > On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > >> > Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. > >> > > >> > >> I was thin

Re: Review Board

2013-03-10 Thread janI
On 10 March 2013 10:51, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 08/03/2013 Rob Weir wrote: > >> That's exactly the issue. The mailing list is so busy that new >> volunteers get lost, and their patches as well. And if they toss >> their patches to bugzilla, the patches can easily be lost there was >> well.

Re: Review Board

2013-03-10 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 08/03/2013 Rob Weir wrote: That's exactly the issue. The mailing list is so busy that new volunteers get lost, and their patches as well. And if they toss their patches to bugzilla, the patches can easily be lost there was well. So the question is whether a dedicated place for patches, with

Re: Review Board

2013-03-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Dave Fisher wrote on Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 15:35:31 -0800: > > On Mar 8, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI wrote: > >> On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Only if we are going to

Re: Review Board

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Fisher
On Mar 8, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI wrote: >> On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. >>> >>> I was thinking more of

Re: Review Board

2013-03-08 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI wrote: > On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> > Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. >> > >> >> I was thinking more of whether it would be useful for working with >> patch co

Re: Review Board

2013-03-08 Thread janI
On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. > > > > I was thinking more of whether it would be useful for working with > patch contributions from contributors. > Just be careful not

Re: Review Board

2013-03-08 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. > I was thinking more of whether it would be useful for working with patch contributions from contributors. -Rob > Otherwise I think it becomes yet another system to learn how to u

Re: Review Board

2013-03-08 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. > > Otherwise I think it becomes yet another system to learn how to use. > I agree with Dave on this. I don't see a particular need. But, interesting, none the less. > > On Mar

Re: Review Board

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Fisher
Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. Otherwise I think it becomes yet another system to learn how to use. On Mar 8, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > https://reviews.apache.org > > I didn't know that this existed at Apache. Should we be using it? > > -Rob > > --