Hi Marcus, all
> On October 17, 2018 at 8:13 PM Marcus wrote:
> OK, a suggestion:
>
> Let's do the 4.1.6 release and look closely for such comments. When
> there are many comments that DEB would be the better default then we
> should change it.
Sounds like a good plan! Thanks!
Regards
Pedro
Am 17.10.2018 um 10:23 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On October 16, 2018 at 11:16 PM Marcus wrote:
1) For versions until 4.1.5 (our current one) links for MD5 hash values
are still offered but no longer for newer versions.
2) When Linux is choosen as platform, a new link "RPM vs. DEB = What to
choose?
Hi Marcus, all
> On October 16, 2018 at 11:16 PM Marcus wrote:
> > 1) For versions until 4.1.5 (our current one) links for MD5 hash values
> > are still offered but no longer for newer versions.
> >
> > 2) When Linux is choosen as platform, a new link "RPM vs. DEB = What to
> > choose?" is of
Am 14.10.2018 um 17:32 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:52 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:19 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:52 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:19 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:19 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:19 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 02.09.2018 um 23:
Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory
Hi Marcus,
Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell
>> wro
Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell
wrote:
It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S
will di
Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S
will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to
do so of which I am not awa
Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S
will display the distro name. I am sure there a
Hi Marcus,
Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>>
>>> It may be useful to know that the terminal command
>>> inxi -S
>>>
>>> will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands t
Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S
will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to do so of
which I am not aware.
inxi is not included in Debian or
On 2018-09-02 8:42 p.m., Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> It may be useful to know that the terminal command
> inxi -S
Might need to emphasize that that is the majuscle S, not minuscle s.
> will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to do so of
> which I am not aware.
inxi -r g
On 2018-09-02 8:49 a.m., Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Apparently the problem is even bigger: I'm now running Ubuntu 16.04.5 x64 and
> I'm still offered the RPMs (see table below)
Using Pale Moon 27.9.3 with English (Canada) as the UI language.
My User-Agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS
On 2018-09-02 11:25 a.m., Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I used the Firefox from the Ubuntu distro, and assumed that was a "standard"
> Firefox.
Ubuntu adds their own special sauce, that, as is usual for those that
compile distros, completely, utterly, and absolutely breaks the program.
jonathon
0x
Hi Rory, all
> On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> It may be useful to know that the terminal command
> inxi -S
>
> will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to do so of
> which I am not aware.
inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 22:34:56 +0200
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Pedro Lino wrote:
> > So this means that the correct Distro information needs to be extracted
> > from somewhere else.
>
> All we have is the user agent. And a user agent like your example:
>
> "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0)
Pedro Lino wrote:
So this means that the correct Distro information needs to be extracted from
somewhere else.
All we have is the user agent. And a user agent like your example:
"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0"
bears no indication of the distribution, so
Am 02.09.2018 um 13:27 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 11:28:24 +0200
Marcus wrote:
Am 02.09.2018 um 11:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
> > Maybe something changed in Debian/Ubuntu?
Actually that was not correct.
Mozilla provides the tar.bz2 when it detects Linux...
Ah, well...
> On September 2, 2018 at 12:41 PM Pedro Lino wrote:
> Curiously, the previous link offers me the right DEBS so we (AOO) we need to
> find out how Mozilla does it... Anyone with an RPM based distro
Hi Rory, all
> On September 2, 2018 at 12:25 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > On a similar Xubuntu 18.04.01 64 bit machine, using Firefox I am
> > offered OO Linux 64-bit (x86-64) (DEB)
> >
> > On that machine User Agent details are
> > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_6
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 11:28:24 +0200
Marcus wrote:
> Am 02.09.2018 um 11:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >> On September 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM Matthias Seidel
> >> mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > > Maybe something changed in Debian/Ubuntu?
> >>>
> >>> > No, but i
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 10:16:13 +0200
Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Rory,
>
> Am 02.09.2018 um 09:58 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 07:51:37 +0100
> > Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 22:59:32 +0100 (WEST)
> >> Pedro Lino wrote:
> >>
> On September 1, 2018 at 10
Am 02.09.2018 um 11:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
> > Maybe something changed in Debian/Ubuntu?
> No, but is your version from the repos? It seems to be an ESR (plain
Mozilla, no Ubuntu
> On September 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
>
>
> > > Maybe something changed in Debian/Ubuntu?
> >
> > > No, but is your version from the repos? It seems to be an ESR
> > (plain
> Mozilla, no Ubuntu in the User Agent).
>
Am 02.09.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:06 AM Marcus wrote:
when you have problems with the download please have a look here:
https://www.openoffice.org/download/analyze.html
That is an useful tool (maybe the link to it should be "Report download problems" inste
Hi Pedro,
Am 02.09.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Marcus
>
>> On September 2, 2018 at 9:06 AM Marcus wrote:
>> when you have problems with the download please have a look here:
>> https://www.openoffice.org/download/analyze.html
> That is an useful tool (maybe the link to it should be "Re
Hi Marcus
> On September 2, 2018 at 9:06 AM Marcus wrote:
> when you have problems with the download please have a look here:
> https://www.openoffice.org/download/analyze.html
That is an useful tool (maybe the link to it should be "Report download
problems" instead of "Report broken link")
A
Hi Rory,
Am 02.09.2018 um 09:58 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 07:51:37 +0100
> Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 22:59:32 +0100 (WEST)
>> Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
On September 1, 2018 at 10:15 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
I am now using Opera 55 on Xubuntu 18.04.01
Am 01.09.2018 um 22:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
You are using Chrome?
No. I'm using the included browser Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32 bit)
when you have problems with the download please have a look here:
https://www.openoffice.org/download/analyze.html
With that information it's easier to anal
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 07:51:37 +0100
Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 22:59:32 +0100 (WEST)
> Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> >
> > > On September 1, 2018 at 10:15 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> >
> > > I am now using Opera 55 on Xubuntu 18.04.01 54 bit. Out of interest I
> > > accessed the downl
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 22:59:32 +0100 (WEST)
Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> > On September 1, 2018 at 10:15 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> > I am now using Opera 55 on Xubuntu 18.04.01 54 bit. Out of interest I
> > accessed the download site and it wanted to download Linux 64-bit (x86-64)
> > (RPM), where
> On September 1, 2018 at 10:15 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I am now using Opera 55 on Xubuntu 18.04.01 54 bit. Out of interest I
> accessed the download site and it wanted to download Linux 64-bit (x86-64)
> (RPM), whereas it should have been Linux 64-bit (x84-64) (DEB)
>
> My User Agent de
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 22:44:53 +0200
Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 01.09.2018 um 22:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >> You are using Chrome?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > No. I'm using the included browser Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32 bit)
> >
>
> Can you post your User Agent?
> https://www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/use
Am 01.09.2018 um 23:00 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Can you post your User Agent?
>> https://www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/user-agent/
>>
>> Firefox on my system (Ubuntu 16.94) has:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Firefox/61.0
>>
>> It identifies wi
> Can you post your User Agent?
> https://www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/user-agent/
>
> Firefox on my system (Ubuntu 16.94) has:
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101
> Firefox/61.0
>
> It identifies with "Ubuntu", so our website can guess the packag
Am 01.09.2018 um 22:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> You are using Chrome?
>>
>>
>
> No. I'm using the included browser Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32 bit)
>
Can you post your User Agent?
https://www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/user-agent/
Firefox on my system (Ubuntu 16.94) has:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Li
> You are using Chrome?
>
>
No. I'm using the included browser Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32 bit)
Hi Pedro,
Am 01.09.2018 um 22:15 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi all
>
>
> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 32-bit but when I click on
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html
>
> I am offered the Linux 32bit RPM.
You are using Chrome?
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Can someone verify/fix th
Hi all
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 32-bit but when I click on
http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html
I am offered the Linux 32bit RPM.
Can someone verify/fix this?
Regards,
Pedro
42 matches
Mail list logo