Hi David, please find my comments below...
Regards,
Christian
David Wilson schrieb:
I would like some advise about when a Specification Document should be
written.
I have submitted quite a few enhancement requests for Writer most of which are
at status=new, some of them have an assigned owner
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am building Openoffice-2.0.3 form scratch on the Debian OS. I am following
the instructions given in the following site
http://tools.openoffice.org/dev_docs/build_linux.html.
In the dmake step, I got the following error:
/opt/Indraveni/OOC680_m7/vcl/source/glyphs
--
All:
What would be the best way to get Braille, Moon, and ASl included as
optional writing systems in OOo/SO? [Braille would include Braille 0,
Braille 1, Braille 1.5, Braille 2, Braille 2.5, Braille 3, Nemeth
Code ]
* Submit a request for Braille as an language of its own, with one
request fo
Hi,
as mentioned in [EMAIL PROTECTED] The issues will be fixed as
soon as the developer is back from vacation (which will be next week).
Regards,
Christian
Kazunari Hirano schrieb:
Hi,
Frank Schönheit wrote:
However, what I really *really* like about this process is
the exchange of ideas a
Hi,
is it possible to show the printerSetup-Dialog (File->Printer
Setup...) using the api (and not the dispatch-framework)?
best regards,
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi David,
from a feature documentation perspective it makes no difference to use
the template, a wiki, a HTML page, or what ever comes into your mind.
I think it is more important that the UI feature and its functionality
is described in well mannor. I personally think a wiki is absolutely
fi
David Fraser schrieb:
Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi,
Frank Schönheit wrote:
However, what I really *really* like about this process is
the exchange of ideas and arguments.
I respect the process.
I encourage community developers and CJK developers to access the spec
project wiki [1] and the spec
Hi David,
from a feature documentation standpoint it makes no difference to use
the template, a wiki, a HTML page, or what ever comes into your mind.
It is more important that the UI feature and its functionality is
described well. I personally think a wiki is absolutely fine to do that,
but
Hi David,
from a feature documentation standpoint it makes no difference to use
the template, a wiki, a HTML page, or what ever comes into your mind.
It is more important that the UI feature and its functionality is
described well. I personally think a wiki is absolutely fine to do that,
but
Bjoern Milcke wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Bjoern Milcke wrote:
Hi Stephan,
I came across the following piece of code:
String a;
xub_StrLen n = 0;
n += a.Len();
This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning:
warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', poss
Hi Stephan,
Bjoern Milcke wrote:
Hi Stephan,
I came across the following piece of code:
String a;
xub_StrLen n = 0;
n += a.Len();
This breaks on Windows (due to -werror). Because of the warning:
warning C4244: '+=' : conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', possible
loss of data (in
Nikolai Pretzell schrieb:
Hi Thorsten,
Sorry for the german language posting, was not intended to be here.
Nikolai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allen Pulsifer schrieb:
Hello Joerg,
Thank you for your response. Just to respond further:
The Current/Default distinction in that place was misguided.
That should really be achieved via layering.
I agree with this.
There are other places in OOo where dynamically created keys have such
s
And once more, this time with attachments.
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Hi all,
Each makefile.mk needs to set PRJNAME to the name of the (CVS) module it
is contained in. That is for example used by the MODULES_WITH_WARNINGS
lists, listing those modules (i.e., PRJNAMEs) which are still to be
comp
Hi all,
Each makefile.mk needs to set PRJNAME to the name of the (CVS) module it
is contained in. That is for example used by the MODULES_WITH_WARNINGS
lists, listing those modules (i.e., PRJNAMEs) which are still to be
compiled without warnings=errors. There are occasionally cases where a
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This doesn't mean we can't "freeze" the spec once all stakeholders agree
> it's final, or call it "make a snapshot", by moving the Wiki content to
> a .odt at some time.
>
Sure. There's a bunch of tools that export (Media)Wi
21 matches
Mail list logo
