[dev] Re[dev] Release Engineering IRC chat

2007-07-13 Thread liutao
Hi all, I think we should go to the channel #oootalk,or it will be very disorderly Regards, LiuTao Hi, as Vladimir from the Hamburg Release Engineering team is currently in China, we are going to have a chat with him on the freenode IRC channel #dev.openoffice.org today at 10 am Hamburg

Re: [dev] Re[dev] Release Engineering IRC chat

2007-07-13 Thread Pavel Janík
I think we should go to the channel #oootalk,or it will be very disorderly What about #re.openoffice.org? ;-) -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] Re:Re: [dev] Re[dev] Release Engineering IRC chat

2007-07-13 Thread liutao
That channel is ok :-) LiuTao I think we should go to the channel #oootalk,or it will be very disorderly What about #re.openoffice.org? ;-) -- Pavel Janík - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [dev] Re:Re: [dev] Re[dev] Release Engineering IRC chat

2007-07-13 Thread Jörg Jahnke
OK, lets choose #re.openoffice.org. Jörg liutao schrieb: That channel is ok :-) LiuTao I think we should go to the channel #oootalk,or it will be very disorderly What about #re.openoffice.org? ;-) -- Pavel Janík - To

Re: [dev] Release Engineering IRC chat

2007-07-13 Thread Rüdiger Timm
Jörg Jahnke wrote: Hi, as Vladimir from the Hamburg Release Engineering team is currently in China, we are going to have a chat with him on the freenode IRC channel #dev.openoffice.org today at 10 am Hamburg time (GMT+1) / 4 pm Beijing time. Hopefully some of the colleagues from CH2000 will

Re: [dev] Release Engineering IRC chat

2007-07-13 Thread Rüdiger Timm
Jörg Jahnke wrote: Hi, as Vladimir from the Hamburg Release Engineering team is currently in China, we are going to have a chat with him on the freenode IRC channel #dev.openoffice.org today at 10 am Hamburg time (GMT+1) / 4 pm Beijing time. Hopefully some of the colleagues from CH2000 will

Re: [dev] rtl::Reference vs. [com::sun::star::]uno::References

2007-07-13 Thread Oliver Braun
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Some of the reasons for the namespace problems we are facing are IMHO simply non optimal placings, e.g. com::sun::uno::Reference would have belonged into cppu (cppu::Reference or may be simply uno::Reference. As probably most people agree with, the

Re: [dev] rtl::Reference vs. [com::sun::star::]uno::References

2007-07-13 Thread Philipp Lohmann
Ok, for the nitpickers: Something* pS = NULL; css::uno::ReferenceXSomething x( ps = new Something() ); pS-privateNonUnoFunction(); ;-) Kind regards, pl Stephan Bergmann wrote: Philipp Lohmann wrote: Hi, regarding that example I would normally do Something* pS = new Something();