Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please write it more exactly: that the copyright must be shared with Sun.
>
> For my understanding, a generic question:
>
> If a piece of software has:
>
> "Copyright (C) 2007 Peter Janssens, Jan Peeters"
>
>
Hi Allen,
i don't know who you are neither do i know what your contributions to
OpenOffice.org are. Probably you would say that you never have thought
about any contribution because of the JCA and of course it's your
personal right. But on the other hand we don't know what we have missed
by y
I am still use it. What is the advantage to use bash?
Best regards,
KAMI
>>> Pavel Janík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/08/07 6:21 du. >>>
> Is that still needed? I would like to remove the support for tcsh
> builds if possible. Opinions?
FWIW: I have moved to using bash this weekend...
--
Pavel Janík
I am interested in PPC QA , we need a group that keeps
with release of x86 rpms/deb.
--- "eric.bachard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since some times, the demand for Linux PowerPC
> version is growing. At
> least for french version, and I found people willing
> to help for the QA
> (
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 12:48 -0400, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> The one rational Simon offers that is a little bit different than the usual
> is the following:
>
> "In many cases (including some very well-known open source projects) [the
> JCA] also allows the original donor to offer commercial offeri
Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote:
> hi!
>
> Volker Quetschke wrote:
>> CC'ing ESC and [EMAIL PROTECTED], please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while working on some build feature/improvement for OOo W32 builds
>> I realized that we have quite a lot of special casing of tcsh vs. bash.
Volker Quetschke wrote:
> CC'ing ESC and [EMAIL PROTECTED], please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only.
Please don't reply to the previous message! I botched the reply-to
setting, please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry!
> Hi,
>
> while working on some build feature/improvement for OOo W32 builds
Hello Mathias,
There is a lot of PR in this issue floating around the internet these days,
most of it coming from Sun. Its clear to me that the goal of this PR is to
maintain the status quo, i.e., ensure that contributions to the project keep
coming in, and that the contributors sign the JCA or i
hi!
Volker Quetschke wrote:
> CC'ing ESC and [EMAIL PROTECTED], please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only.
>
> Hi,
>
> while working on some build feature/improvement for OOo W32 builds
> I realized that we have quite a lot of special casing of tcsh vs. bash.
really? beside setting up the environme
Is that still needed? I would like to remove the support for tcsh
builds if possible. Opinions?
FWIW: I have moved to using bash this weekend...
--
Pavel Janík
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
CC'ing ESC and [EMAIL PROTECTED], please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only.
Hi,
while working on some build feature/improvement for OOo W32 builds
I realized that we have quite a lot of special casing of tcsh vs. bash.
Is that still needed? I would like to remove the support for tcsh
builds if pos
On 10/8/07, Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please write it more exactly: that the copyright must be shared with Sun.
For my understanding, a generic question:
If a piece of software has:
"Copyright (C) 2007 Peter Janssens, Jan Peeters"
or
"Copyright (C) 2007 Peter Janssens
C
Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> Speaking as a community participant...
>
> When I first became involved in OOo, I was not completely comfortable with
> the license arrangement, but thought Sun should be given the benefit of the
> doubt based on all of their contributions.
>
> However, let's look at this
Hello Juergen, Davide, Allen, all,
Juergen Schmidt a écrit :
> Hi Davide,
>
> Davide Dozza wrote:
>> Hi Juergen,
>>
>> I wouldn't discuss about [2] and [3]. They are just examples and they
>> have been discussing on other places.
>>
>> I would like to discuss about [1] and why we are almost the s
14 matches
Mail list logo