[dev] I thought that it was a bug

2008-05-11 Thread 李湛
In openoffice.org_2.4_sdk\include\uno\lbnames.h #if (! defined (CPPU_ENV) && defined (TMP_CPPU_ENV)) #define CPPU_ENV TMP_CPPU_ENV #endif #ifdef CPPU_ENV #define CPPU_STRINGIFY_EX( x ) #x #define CPPU_STRINGIFY( x ) CPPU_STRINGIFY_EX( x ) /** Name for C++ compiler/ platform, e.g.

Re: [dev] How to set the GUI language when building?

2008-05-11 Thread Ma Zhenyu
hi, Christian Thank you for your kind, I try "dmake ooolanguagepack" but found "/usr/bin/bash: zh-CN: command not found", could you tell why and how to solve it? Regards, Mynfred 2008/5/10, Christian Lohmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi *, > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 04:40:15PM +0800, Ma Zhenyu w

Re: [dev] OOo crash for documents with heavy formatting

2008-05-11 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Andriy Rysin wrote: Hi all, I was just wandering if necessary level of attention is given to the OOo crash problem (84159) - it was reported before 2.4 with target 3.x but it seems after the bug was confirmed the interest in it was lost. The bug basically renders OOo unusable for documents w

Re: [dev] Oo writer's problem

2008-05-11 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Dinesh Chothe wrote: Hello, I am developing writer based application using java,oo sdk and netbeans. In this application object has to travels from starting of document up to end of document. While moving it may come across d

Re: [dev] Cannot read document

2008-05-11 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Peter, Although you can NOT send the document, can you create a document with similar structure in WORD that behaves the same way, and then attach it to a bug report? Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Hello! I've got a strange word document, which I cannot correctly open with OO.org 2.4. It has a str

Re: [dev] CHINA001 (was: Re: [dev] List of 2730 uncallable methods in DEV300_m10)

2008-05-11 Thread Caolan McNamara
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 17:54 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Hi Niklas, > > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 19:17 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote: > > example: CHINA001 > > In the interest of removing the unused code, I'd like know what those > CHINA001 labels are for. Is it okay to perhaps review those commented