Éric Bischoff wrote:
> Recoding for qt, gtk, win32, and Cocoa is a serious duplication of efforts.
>
> If the purpose for having an abstract layer and porting on so many APIs is
> PORTABILITY to many operating systems, then this duplication of efforts
> becomes
> useless, because Qt is already
Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>> Along that lines, see the work that's happening around dialog
>> auto-layouting and the awt toolkit
>> (http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2008/programme/friday_1470.pdf)
> we need the layouter, we need it, we need it ... When will it be really
> usable?
>
Hi Juergen,
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 22:47:19 Thorsten Behrens, vous avez écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
> why are you following up to my (unrelated) lib unloading mail?!
Bad habits of mine, sorry.
> (...)
> So that's nothing we should do on a whim - quite the contrary,
Of course.
> we should never ever again bin
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Éric Bischoff wrote:
Nokia recently relicensed the Qt library under a triple license : GPL, LGPL,
and commercial.
Qt is cute, modern, C++, easy to program with, and multiplatform. Wouldn't it
be the ideal replacement for VCL, now that LGPL is an option?
Hi Eric,
wh
