Re: [dev] amount of stopper / regressions for 3.1 release

2009-04-02 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Matthias B. wrote: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: Hi Mathias, Matthias B. wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Maximilian Odendahl wrote: can you name some of these regressions which prevent you in using 3.1? http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100

Re: [dev] amount of stopper / regressions for 3.1 release

2009-04-02 Thread Rich
On 2009.04.02. 17:41, Matthias B. wrote: ... Two issue, both submitted really late for a 3.1 release. That is not optimal and of course it was really late. You have pointed out that you switched to dev snapshots early but because of too much problems you moved back. Have you reported problems at

Re: [dev] amount of stopper / regressions for 3.1 release

2009-04-02 Thread Matthias B.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Matthias B. wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Maximilian Odendahl >> wrote: >>> >>> can you name some of these regressions which prevent you in using 3.1? >>> >> >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cg

[dev] Participate in OpenOffice.org

2009-04-02 Thread Dien Truong Thanh
Hello, my name's Dien. I'm a student and I want to practice more about java. I particapate in OpenOffice.org. But I'm newbie in java so I don't know how where to begin. Can you tell me some idea about it. Thank you very much.

Re: [dev] amount of stopper / regressions for 3.1 release

2009-04-02 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Hi Mathias, Matthias B. wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Maximilian Odendahl wrote: can you name some of these regressions which prevent you in using 3.1? http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374 and http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100718 thanks fo

Re: [dev] OpenOffice.org Java JRE search paths

2009-04-02 Thread Joachim Lingner
Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote: On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200 Jochen wrote: Hanno Meyer-Thurow schrieb: So, in short it would be these three points of interest: - change Java JRE search paths to one (set by configure option) This is currently not supported. I can

Re: [dev] amount of stopper / regressions for 3.1 release

2009-04-02 Thread Matthias B.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Maximilian Odendahl wrote: > can you name some of these regressions which prevent you in using 3.1? > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100374 and http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100718 Both scheduled for 3.2. Matthias ---

RE: [dev] filters as extensions -- lucky!

2009-04-02 Thread Emmanuel Bégué
> -Original Message- > From: mikhail.voyte...@sun.com [mailto:mikhail.voyte...@sun.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:58 PM > > By the way, if two extensions install the same filter, the result is > unpredictable if I remember correctly. Hello, Indeed it works! But it needs a reall

Re: [dev] Setting up with Visual Studio 2008

2009-04-02 Thread Carsten Driesner
Quentin Headen wrote: Hello. My name is Quentin. I am a high school student, and I am interested in computer programming. I want to get into the open office development to help polish my already learned skills in C++ and Java. I have Visual Studio 2008 professional installed on my computer. I know

[dev] Setting up with Visual Studio 2008

2009-04-02 Thread Quentin Headen
Hello. My name is Quentin. I am a high school student, and I am interested in computer programming. I want to get into the open office development to help polish my already learned skills in C++ and Java. I have Visual Studio 2008 professional installed on my computer. I know you have informati

Re: [dev] amount of stopper / regressions for 3.1 release

2009-04-02 Thread Maximilian Odendahl
Hi, for 3.1. The result is that OOo 3.1 will be the worst OOo ever from our POV. It's so broken that it's impossible to use with our app and our organization (that's over 9000 OOo installations) will have to completely skip 3.1 and pray for 3.2 to be better. can you name some of these regressi