Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/23/10 14:09, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. Then that

Re: [dev] I have a blank Calc document that shows red text in 3.3

2010-08-24 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 08/23/10 23:44, James wrote: I deleted the text. The question is how did the image get there? Probably by pasting HTML from a web page. Niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional command

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > The static > NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), > "jpipe"); in class com.sun.star.lib.connections.pip.PipeConnection > within jurt.jar effectively depends on finding a jpipe dynamic li

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > This works in standard OOo installations, where the jpipe dynamic > library is found relative to jurt.jar within the URE installation either > in ../../lib (Unix) or ../bin (Windows). > > This fails if you either use a jur

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:26:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > The static > > NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), > > "jpipe"); in class com.sun.star.lib.connections.pip.PipeConn

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread rony
Hi René, hi Michael, just managed to re-install the Ubuntu version of OOo. Out of the box the reported error occurs. Then, following Michael's advice and adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH resolved the problem and OOo can be addressed via Java from the commandline ! So there is at least

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: > So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup > somewhere. As we already found out in this thread. It's a problem in Debian and Ubuntu because we move the Java libs to a standardized path with symlinks and OOo canno

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/24/10 10:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:26:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: The static NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), "jpipe"); in class com.sun.star.lib.connec

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:43PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Please do not put an absolute path into plain OOo's jurt.jar Class-Path. It's for *Debians* OOo. The path won't change in Debian anyways (and if it did it would automaticatilly be adapted). I don't think there's a safe way

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:02:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: > > So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup > > somewhere. > > As we already found out in this thread. > It's a problem in Debian and Ubuntu

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/24/10 13:31, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:43PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Please do not put an absolute path into plain OOo's jurt.jar Class-Path. It's for *Debians* OOo. The path won't change in Debian anyways (and if it did it would automaticatilly be adapted