[dev] MacOSX: ScirptingFramework's "Edit" ...

Hi there, in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that adds ooRexx as a new macro language to OOo on the MacOSX. The tested ooRexx scripts run correctly, it is possible to create new macros ("Tools - Macros - Organize Macros - ooRexx", then "Run" or "Create", which create

[dev] Solved (Re: [dev] Partially solved (Re: [dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3+Java: howto setup ?

Using the following shell script to set up the CLASSPATH environment variable on MacOSX solved the problem finally: UNO_PATH=/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/program OOOJAVA=/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link/ure-link/share/java export CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH

[dev] Partially solved (Re: [dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3+Java: howto setup ?

Partially solved! The CLASSPATH-environment variable must also have the directory listed, in which soffice resides. The shell script to create the needed environment on Apple looks like: UNO_PATH=/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/program export PATH=$PATH:$UNO_PATH OOOJAVA=

Re: [dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3+Java: howto setup ?

In the meantime I experimented with the Java system variable "com.sun.star.lib.loader.unopath" to no avail. The most important settings used were: propName="com.sun.star.lib.loader.unopath" propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/MacOS" propValue="/Applications/OpenOffic

Re: [dev] ARM port

Hi Rene, Le 15 févr. 11 à 13:19, Rene Engelhard a écrit : On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:08:47PM +0100, eric b wrote: Sorry, but I tend to disagree : can you please tell me the arm version choosen by default in OOo source code ? I'm just working at Whatever default your compiler does. $ file /u

Re: [dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3+Java: howto setup ?

On 15.02.2011 13:31, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 02/15/11 11:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> trying to figure out the setup needs for OOo 3.3 on MacOSX, if wishing >> to use Java from the commandline to bootstrap and work with OOo 3.3. > >

Re: [dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3+Java: howto setup ?

On 02/15/11 11:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: trying to figure out the setup needs for OOo 3.3 on MacOSX, if wishing to use Java from the commandline to bootstrap and work with OOo 3.3.

Re: [dev] ARM port

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:08:47PM +0100, eric b wrote: > Sorry, but I tend to disagree : can you please tell me the arm > version choosen by default in OOo source code ? I'm just working at Whatever default your compiler does. $ file /usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 /usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.

Re: [dev] ARM port

Hi, Apologies ... Le 15 févr. 11 à 12:08, eric b a écrit : The reality, today says : you can buy development boards, including OMAP4 (like Pandaboard), and is not multi-core. ... I was too fast : PandaBoard is multi core. I have some doubts OOo will use both, but worth a try. Anyway

Re: [dev] ARM port

Le 15 févr. 11 à 11:54, Rene Engelhard a écrit : Hi, Hi René, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:38:15AM +0100, eric b wrote: OpenOffice.org is already ported to Linux ARM, oabi and eabi, le and be. Sure. But the current port is generic and needs some improvements at several places anyway,

Re: [dev] ARM port

Hi, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:38:15AM +0100, eric b wrote: > >OpenOffice.org is already ported to Linux ARM, oabi and eabi, le and > >be. > > > > Sure. But the current port is generic and needs some improvements at > several places anyway, plus, the current OpenOffice.org is unusable > on such m

[dev] MacOSX+OOo3.3+Java: howto setup ?

Hi there, trying to figure out the setup needs for OOo 3.3 on MacOSX, if wishing to use Java from the commandline to bootstrap and work with OOo 3.3. Adding the paths to all of the OOo 3.3. jar-files to CLASSPATH does not yield success, as openoffice is not found. What is the correct/designed se

[dev] Re: [dev-educ] Re: [dev] ARM port

Certainly a version of OOo that works well on ARM technologies is very important for the future. It could even be the case that if there isn't such a thing, the project will become largely irrelevant. On 15 February 2011 09:38, eric b wrote: > Hi Caolan, > > Le 15 févr. 11 à 10:26, Caolán McNama

[dev] Re: [dev-educ] Re: [dev] ARM port

Hi Ian Looks like I had to moderate your mail (probably not subscribed ?) Le 15 févr. 11 à 10:47, Ian Lynch a écrit : Certainly a version of OOo that works well on ARM technologies is very important for the future. That's one role of the OpenOffice.org Education Project to innovate, and

Re: [dev] ARM port

Hi Caolan, Le 15 févr. 11 à 10:26, Caolán McNamara a écrit : On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 10:15 +0100, eric b wrote: Anybody working on ARM port ? OpenOffice.org is already ported to Linux ARM, oabi and eabi, le and be. Sure. But the current port is generic and needs some improvements at sever

Re: [dev] ARM port

On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 10:15 +0100, eric b wrote: > Anybody working on ARM port ? OpenOffice.org is already ported to Linux ARM, oabi and eabi, le and be. C. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additio

[dev] ARM port

[Please FU2 d...@education.openoffice.org ] Hello, Anybody working on ARM port ? Or interested to try ? As experimental test, I did the native OOo4Kids build on OMAP3, and work on new features (to be backported in OOo) could constitute a good study case for beginners in OOo source code.

Re: [dev] hi

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Ahmed Sayeed wrote: > hi openoffice team, i am a btech, and willing to help but the problem is > that i am a beginner in programming although i have a sound knowledge as a > network engg.i have just begun using c++ and want to help but need some > assistance at ti

[dev] hi

hi openoffice team, i am a btech, and willing to help but the problem is that i am a beginner in programming although i have a sound knowledge as a network engg.i have just begun using c++ and want to help but need some assistance at times. thank you for your time. awaiting eager responce -- Than