[dev] conulta open office

2011-06-06 Thread Yesi Idaberry
hola no se si este es el medio para realizar consultas pero no encontre otro. tengo un problema que no puedo solucionar : me aparece el siguiente mensaje cuando quiero abrir un archivo del tipo hoja de calculo de open office la operacion solicitada requiere elevacion por que podria ser? el

[dev] Re: conulta open office

2011-06-06 Thread Alexandro Colorado
2011/6/6 Yesi Idaberry yesi_be...@hotmail.com hola no se si este es el medio para realizar consultas pero no encontre otro. tengo un problema que no puedo solucionar : me aparece el siguiente mensaje cuando quiero abrir un archivo del tipo hoja de calculo de open office la operacion

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-06 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi rony, On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:55:44 +0200 rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote: totally off the records for this list, indeed. but maybe nevertheless interesting/amusing: Ubuntu 11.04 replaced OOo with LibreOffice (LO). thats true. Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with

[dev] refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
Has anyone tried refactoring OUString? - It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not necessary. - It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their equivalents. - It prevents debugging efforts because of sal_Unicode buffer[1]. - It mixtures different

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Stahl
On 06.06.11 16:35, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: Has anyone tried refactoring OUString? - It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not necessary. - It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their equivalents. - It prevents debugging efforts because

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-06 Thread rony
Hi Bjoern, On 06.06.2011 12:42, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with their OOo installation in the past with the effect that using the Java interface from the command line does not work (using their unoinfo-output for Java) ! That has

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
On 2011/06/07 0:27, Michael Stahl wrote: refactoring OUString has to be done carefully because it is a central part of the URE API/ABI and those must be compatible. a number of people here have come to the conclusion that it would be an improvement to use ::rtl::OString with UTF8 encoding as

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 06.06.2011 18:57, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: On 2011/06/07 0:27, Michael Stahl wrote: refactoring OUString has to be done carefully because it is a central part of the URE API/ABI and those must be compatible. a number of people here have come to the conclusion that it would be

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
On 06.06.2011 18:57, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: This is just an idea. How about adding a new class besides OUString? On 2011/06/07 2:16, Mathias Bauer wrote: We already have enough string classes. :-) Yes, we have! :-) Besides that, you are right, rtl::OUString is stupid. We planned

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-06 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 06.06.2011 19:43, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: And also, please cover the underlying memory allocation mechanism which would be another key factor for the performance improvement. There's an old suggestion to treat small strings differently, see