hola no se si este es el medio para realizar consultas pero no encontre otro.
tengo un problema que no puedo solucionar : me aparece el siguiente mensaje
cuando quiero abrir un archivo del tipo hoja de calculo de open office la
operacion solicitada requiere elevacion por que podria ser? el
2011/6/6 Yesi Idaberry yesi_be...@hotmail.com
hola no se si este es el medio para realizar consultas pero no encontre
otro. tengo un problema que no puedo solucionar : me aparece el siguiente
mensaje cuando quiero abrir un archivo del tipo hoja de calculo de open
office la operacion
Hi rony,
On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:55:44 +0200
rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote:
totally off the records for this list,
indeed.
but maybe nevertheless
interesting/amusing: Ubuntu 11.04 replaced OOo with LibreOffice (LO).
thats true.
Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with
Has anyone tried refactoring OUString?
- It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not
necessary.
- It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their equivalents.
- It prevents debugging efforts because of sal_Unicode buffer[1].
- It mixtures different
On 06.06.11 16:35, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
Has anyone tried refactoring OUString?
- It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not
necessary.
- It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their equivalents.
- It prevents debugging efforts because
Hi Bjoern,
On 06.06.2011 12:42, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with their OOo
installation in the past with the effect that using the Java interface from
the command line does not work (using their unoinfo-output for Java) !
That has
On 2011/06/07 0:27, Michael Stahl wrote:
refactoring OUString has to be done carefully because it is a central part
of the URE API/ABI and those must be compatible.
a number of people here have come to the conclusion that it would be an
improvement to use ::rtl::OString with UTF8 encoding as
On 06.06.2011 18:57, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
On 2011/06/07 0:27, Michael Stahl wrote:
refactoring OUString has to be done carefully because it is a central
part
of the URE API/ABI and those must be compatible.
a number of people here have come to the conclusion that it would be
On 06.06.2011 18:57, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
This is just an idea. How about adding a new class besides OUString?
On 2011/06/07 2:16, Mathias Bauer wrote:
We already have enough string classes. :-)
Yes, we have! :-)
Besides that, you are right, rtl::OUString is stupid. We planned
On 06.06.2011 19:43, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote:
And also, please cover the underlying memory allocation mechanism which
would be another key factor for the performance improvement.
There's an old suggestion to treat small strings differently, see
10 matches
Mail list logo