Re: [dev] Possible bug in bookmark implementation....?

two times? First the "A" will be deleted and then the "B". The bookmark will be deleted with the "B". Does this fit to your expectation? Or do you have a better idea? Regards Andreas -- Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer Open

Re: [dev] Possible bug in bookmark implementation....?

kmark). It will be difficult to specify this behavior in a way that delivers expected result for every situation. Regards Andreas -- Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] which cause influence on the return value of function SwWrtShell::_CanInsert()

any text until you deselect this text frame. Regards Andreas Best Regards Gao Peng E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : 2007-07-30 -- Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

Hi, liutao wrote: Hi Malte,Andreas Andreas Martens wrote: That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)? because the function GetEditShell() need this parameter and it is called by the function PaMCorrAbs() then Co

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

Hi Malte, Malte Timmermann wrote: Andreas... Andreas Martens wrote: Hi Malte, Malte Timmermann wrote: IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply listeners and we don't need the parameter. That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

have that, and normally we didn't want that, because we are just moving away the layout from the SwDoc to the ViewShell... Yes, so again, why do we need this layout parameter for DeleteSection(..)? Any comments/ideas? No, only questions ;-) Regards Andreas Malte. Andreas Martens wrote:

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

.how to deal with it and make the destructor can disposal this function. Best Regards, LiuTao Kindly regards Andreas --- Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS ---

Re: [dev] gcc-4.2.0 invisible text

- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Re: [dev] SISSL is *really* deprecated

Hi, Pavel Janík wrote: Hi, the following files still reference the license SISSL (files from helpcontent2 are not included on purpose): [..] sw/inc/IDocumentSettingAccess.hxx sw/inc/IDocumentTimerAccess.hxx [..] see issue 73752 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73752 Regards

Re: [dev] Specifications - summary & suggestions ...

Hi Michael, I agree on many points: Michael Meeks wrote: [..] * Proposed new process Sorry, didn't find something new :-( [..] + New spec. process: + 'Wiki' based solution (for those that want it) This has been already accepted. + minimal data required for good QA The