Re: [dev] OpenOffice bug site is down for many days now?

2005-04-05 Thread Matt Prazak
--- "vy.ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (I am sorry if you get this twice) > > I tried to create a new bug in the OpenOffice website. However, I > cannot get to it. I can log into the site. I can also see previous bug > report. However, clicking on an item like My Issues: > http://qa.openoffi

Re: [dev] Question regarding unused code removal

2005-03-30 Thread Matt Prazak
For submitting the script using the issue tracker, it is unclear which category is best for this type of submission. The options appear to be "qa", "tools", and "utilities", but a stand-alone script like this doesn't seem to fit anywhere nicely. Matt --- Ma

Re: [dev] Question regarding unused code removal

2005-03-29 Thread Matt Prazak
I ended up writing a short Bourne shell script that does the best I know how to do when looking at just the binaries in the program/ directory. While there is no guarantee that the reported symbols are completely unused, they are clearly canidates for the *_DLLPRIVATE macros. Once made private,

Re: [dev] Re:[dev] Question regarding unused code removal

2005-03-22 Thread Matt Prazak
Your approach appears more throrough than what I've been attempting. My hypothesis so far is that a fair amount of information can be obtained straight from the binaries in the program/ directory without analyzing the source code. One thing I've learned is that the the ELF symbol tables and relo

Re: [dev] Re:[dev] Question regarding unused code removal

2005-03-18 Thread Matt Prazak
Thanks for the information, it is quite helpful. It seems my approach so far is a start, but more definitely needs to be done to filter out the internally-used symbols. A good result would be a shell script that automates all the details below and returns a few thousand symbols as canidates for

Re: [dev] Re:[dev] Question regarding unused code removal

2005-03-17 Thread Matt Prazak
--- Laurent David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be a problem with virtual methods ? > I had some problem figuring out what was actually executed when using > XML filter: it goes from the swlib to xmloff library (I don't > remember the name of the actual .so, sorry...) back and forth via

Re: [dev] Re:[dev] Question regarding unused code removal

2005-03-17 Thread Matt Prazak
Thanks for the replies. Actually, the number is more like 75,000. I think I read the wrong number yesterday to get the 85,000. I did include all the WEAK references from elfdump, and it looks like eliminating them might take out another 7,000 symbols. Also, I'll feed in the .bin files, which w

[dev] Question regarding unused code removal

2005-03-16 Thread Matt Prazak
At http://tools.openoffice.org/performance/index.html, there is a mention about unused code removal as a way of improving OO.org. Out of curiosity, I managed to generate a list of about 85,000 symbols from the program/ directory that have definitions but no corresponding UNDEF entries in the share

Re: [dev] Compiler Bug? (Sun Studio 10, Solaris Express 11/04, OO.org tag NSRC680_m71s1)

2005-02-07 Thread Matt Prazak
att, > > this certainly looks like a bug in Sun Studio 10. > > Heiner > > Matt Prazak wrote: > > In icu/unxsols4.pro/misc/build/icu/source/i18n/ucol_bld.cpp, there > is a > > while loop in ucol_doCE() that, for me, will never exit, even when > the > > co

Re: [dev] Compiler Bug? (Please reply to new thread below, if you wish)

2005-02-06 Thread Matt Prazak
__ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

[dev] Compiler Bug? (NEW THREAD) (Sun Studio 10, Solaris Express 11/04, OO.org tag NSRC680_m71s1)

2005-02-06 Thread Matt Prazak
I got mixed up with Yahoo! Mail, so below is a new attempt at my thread: --FIRST MESSAGE-- In icu/unxsols4.pro/misc/build/icu/source/i18n/ucol_bld.cpp, there is a while loop in ucol_doCE() that, for me, will never exit, even when the condition is false! When I re-write the loop, the problem goe

Re: [dev] Compiler Bug? (Sun Studio 10, Solaris Express 11/04, OO.org tag NSRC680_m71s1)

2005-02-06 Thread Matt Prazak
> > Please create new threads for new problems, not hijack unrelated > threads > > Grüße/Regards, > > René > I thought I did create a new thread...but now that I think of it, I used another message as a template, which probably confused threaded e-mail readers. If that's the case, I apolo

[dev] Compiler Bug? (Sun Studio 10, Solaris Express 11/04, OO.org tag NSRC680_m71s1)

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Prazak
In icu/unxsols4.pro/misc/build/icu/source/i18n/ucol_bld.cpp, there is a while loop in ucol_doCE() that, for me, will never exit, even when the condition is false! When I re-write the loop, the problem goes away. This problem occurs while running dmake, when a program called genrb invokes ucol_do