Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
I think your suggestion to allow for more and earlier feedback is valid
and good. But getting involved should be a duty of those wanting to get
involved, there shouldn't be a duty for iTeams to wait for input upfront.
...
Just to be perfectly clear, I agree with you
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Joe Smith wrote:
I've started to see these messages on the features announce list (via
Gmane). This seems like a good thing, but I have some questions:
1) Is there any mechanism for feedback on these features?
None seem to have any issue number; are they supposed to be
Hi Joe,
There should be some link on the feature announcement, either to an
issue id, or to a mailing address ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is not
useful to outsiders!) or mailing list where comments can be made that
will definitely be seen by the iTeam. I expect most will get no
comments, but some
Hi,
Joe Smith wrote:
I've started to see these messages on the features announce list (via
Gmane). This seems like a good thing, but I have some questions:
1) Is there any mechanism for feedback on these features?
None seem to have any issue number; are they supposed to be tracked
through
Uwe Fischer wrote:
...
there is a Spec Doc at
http://specs.openoffice.org/impress/sd.insertbackground.odt
In that doc, the issue number is given as:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82911
I assume we use this mailing list for feedback
...
Ahh, of course. I should've
Joe Smith wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Joe Smith wrote:
I've started to see these messages on the features announce list (via
Gmane). This seems like a good thing, but I have some questions:
1) Is there any mechanism for feedback on these features?
None seem to have any issue number;
I've started to see these messages on the features announce list (via
Gmane). This seems like a good thing, but I have some questions:
1) Is there any mechanism for feedback on these features?
None seem to have any issue number; are they supposed to be tracked
through the CWS name? If so, is
