On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 22:17 +0900, Hung Nguyen Vu wrote:
> Where is the patch or src.rpm?
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/openoffice.org/openoffice.org.2.0.3-ooo66018.cppuhelper.dangerousvisibility.patch?hideattic=0&revision=1.2&view=markup
> As you recomended,I am compiling gcc 4.3.1 o
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Caolan McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those actual warnings are basically spurious, ignore them.
Thanks. It is simple.
But, I know that your particular compiler, given as it is equivalent to
> the RHEL-5 gcc, actually probably *does* has a bug with visibil
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 17:34 +0900, Hung Nguyen Vu wrote:
> Should I upgrade my gcc?
> What version of gcc is recommended for building OOo 3?
Those actual warnings are basically spurious, ignore them.
But, I know that your particular compiler, given as it is equivalent to
the RHEL-5 gcc, actually
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Caolan McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > /home/vuhung/public_html/foss/src/DEV300_m29/solver/300/
> > unxlngi6.pro/inc/com/sun/star/uno/Any.hxx:268:
> > warning: lowering visibility of 'sal_Bool
> > com::sun::star::uno::operator==(const com::sun::star::uno::A
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 17:14 +0900, Hung Nguyen Vu wrote:
> Sorry for cross-posting but I seems that I have asked in a wrong mailing
> list.
> So I forward this email.
>
> When I compile DEV300_m29 with dmake, I get the following *warning*:
>
> /home/vuhung/public_html/foss/src/DEV300_m29/solver/
Sorry for cross-posting but I seems that I have asked in a wrong mailing
list.
So I forward this email.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hung Nguyen Vu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Date: Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:08 PM
Subject: DEV300_m29/solver/300/unxlngi6.pro/inc/com/sun/st
