Re: [dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-02 Thread Jim Watson
Quoting NAKATA Maho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As for that status, it's compiled about 75% through (I estimate) and > nothin= > > g's=20 > > bombed out so far. > you seem to have installed SUN or Blackdown's jdk ;) but

Re: [dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-02 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Chris White wrote: Hi all, I'm currently building Open Office with gcc-4.1.0 20060120 snapshot. It says my compiler is unkown, and to post the configure results ( gcc.hpp:67:7:warning #warning "Unknown compiler version... ). However, I'd like to know if the compiler unknown warning is base

Re: [dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-01 Thread NAKATA Maho
In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As for that status, it's compiled about 75% through (I estimate) and nothin= > g's=20 > bombed out so far. you seem to have installed SUN or Blackdown's jdk ;) there are some breakages: JAVADOC (need gjdoc) JAVACMD (to

Re: [dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-01 Thread Chris White
On Thursday 02 February 2006 08:01, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:32:46 +0900 > > Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Chris, > it won't break because of 'Unknown compiler version' warning. > This comes from Gentoos gcc version like > > 4.1.0-beta20060

[dev] GCC 4.1 and OpenOffice build 2.0.1.2

2006-02-01 Thread Chris White
Hi all, I'm currently building Open Office with gcc-4.1.0 20060120 snapshot. It says my compiler is unkown, and to post the configure results ( gcc.hpp:67:7:warning #warning "Unknown compiler version... ). However, I'd like to know if the compiler unknown warning is based upon the ve