Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Certainly, the final solution would run these tests during regular
builds, just want to keep some work for later ... ;-)
Hi Kay,
yes, definitely. What about a staged approach to that: first in
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Certainly, the final solution would run these tests during regular
> builds, just want to keep some work for later ... ;-)
>
Hi Kay,
yes, definitely. What about a staged approach to that: first include
all unit tests in a regular bui
Michael Meeks wrote:
[...]
Great - so, what pieces of code have functioning unit tests ? whenever
I hack on a module I like to try and find these tests, I poke in
'workben' and I see very frequently stale/un-buildable/un-runable code,
then I poke in qa/ and eg. in configmgr/qa/unoapi I se
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks schrieb:
> I hack on a module I like to try and find these tests, I poke in
> 'workben' and I see very frequently stale/un-buildable/un-runable code,
> then I poke in qa/ and eg. in configmgr/qa/unoapi I see a makefile.mk I
> 'dmake' that, something happens and it barfs:
Hi Christian,
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 17:54 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> An unfair cite.
;-) lets look at the context & contention:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 23:57 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> > > You mix up some things here. Nobody said that we need a spec for
>>> each and every "ti
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
> Once again thank you for your thought provoking mail.
>
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 23:57 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> You mix up some things here. Nobody said that we need a spec for each
>> and every "tiny ergonomic fix". We need them for new features
Hi Michael, *,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:27:23PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 23:57 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> > You mix up some things here. Nobody said that we need a spec for each
> > and every "tiny ergonomic fix". We need them for new features - e.g. a
> > quickstar
Hi Mathias,
Once again thank you for your thought provoking mail.
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 23:57 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> You mix up some things here. Nobody said that we need a spec for each
> and every "tiny ergonomic fix". We need them for new features - e.g. a
> quickstarter on Linu
