Thomas Wood wrote:
[updating way when node moved]
However, I think potlatch does work in this way..
It does in 0.5 but won't in 0.6.
This does make it a bit more difficult in 0.6 for Potlatch's way revert tool
('H') to figure out what the revision dates were, which is what I'm working
on at
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Somebody just asked on the German mailing list about Google not finding
pages from our wiki any more. I just checked this and it does find some,
but they are all still ../index.php/.. URLs. Looking at the robots.txt and
the
Erik Johansson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Somebody just asked on the German mailing list about Google not finding
pages from our wiki any more. I just checked this and it does find some,
but they are all still ../index.php/.. URLs. Looking at
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Erik Johansson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Somebody just asked on the German mailing list about Google not finding
pages from our wiki any more. I just checked this and it does
2009/1/13 Neil Penman ianaf4...@yahoo.com:
Hmm, trying my post again with a message created from scratch! I didn't
realise I couldn't just reply all to another message, change the subject and
delete the old text! Its a bad habit anyway so time I stopped it.
I get a 400 error when I try and
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
The googlebot is probably blocked as bots tend to kill the wiki due to
the extreme crapness of mediawiki.
Bots happily hit Wikipedia all day without killing it, is the OSM wiki
set up
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
We have one little Atom based machine. They have a metric buttload of
database servers serving pages to ten metric buttloads of web servers
fronted by about a thousand metric buttloads of squid caches.
Then don't be such a sissy and get use the metric buttload of
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
So yes, MediaWiki is crap, especially when used by computer geeks who tend
to actually use the templating features. What options do we have? Close down
the Wiki? Replace it with another Wiki software? Look for
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
The first thing that should be done is to ensure that MediaWiki's
caching infrastructure, both internal (memcache, message cache etc)
and external (squid) is correctly set up and all working optimally
together. I discussed this briefly with TomH on IRC which told
It doesn't help that we have some ridiculously complicated pages like map
features which are not only hugely complicated with masses of templates but
also get changed very frequently.
We are currently evaluating how Semantic MediaWiki can help us to manage map
feature infos on the wiki (see
Hi,
Osmosis used to create a bbox column for the ways table. As I didn't
need this I replaced all its queries with queries to create and update
a LINESTRING-column instead. This works flawlessly and as I understand
this feature has since been added to Osmosis (I'm using 0.29.2). As
this update
Lars Francke wrote:
Hi,
Osmosis used to create a bbox column for the ways table. As I didn't
need this I replaced all its queries with queries to create and update
a LINESTRING-column instead. This works flawlessly and as I understand
this feature has since been added to Osmosis (I'm using
Hi,
I doubt if I'll
be able to look at this myself soon so feel free to experiment with
improvements.
and thank you for your comments and clarifications. I will have a look
at this but it will take me some time. I'll get back to you when I
have something to report.
Lars
13 matches
Mail list logo
