On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:33:44 +0300, Iulian Banaga iulian.ban...@gmail.com
wrote:
As I said my format is based on the Navit's one, and I can say that these
are 80% similar. How did I choose this format? The fact that this app
will
run on mobile devices that are limited in terms of memory and CPU
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:10:37 +0100, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
So if someone downloads and starts using JOSM today, will it
automatically switch over next month when the API changes, or will
users need to fiddle their config?
No.
They currently need to fiddle with the
I'd like to add several tags with the same key. In the most cases this
no good practice, but with urls it makes sense, e.g. to add several
images to one feature.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Andreas Kalsch wrote:
I'd like to add several tags with the same key. In the most cases this
no good practice, but with urls it makes sense, e.g. to add several
images to one feature.
I think it makes sense... Like there is within one building (actually at
the same place) a post-box, and
Hallo,
Andreas Kalsch wrote:
I'd like to add several tags with the same key. In the most cases this
no good practice, but with urls it makes sense, e.g. to add several
images to one feature.
This was never supported by JOSM, and while it is currently still
possible to have several tags
El Jueves, 2 de Abril de 2009, Will Nordin escribió:
I am trying to convert the planet-090319.osm (approx 107GB) to gml. I've
tried the Java and Python solutions, but both end up thorwing OutOfMemory
exceptions.
Man, it's one-frakking-hundred gigabytes, how would it *not* cause OOM
errors?!
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
You should try splitting the planet with Osmosis first, then individually
converting each of the pieces to GML.
... but first make sure that the tools you wish to process the resulting
GML with are actually capable of handling that amount of data ;-)
Depending
2009/4/2 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hallo,
Andreas Kalsch wrote:
I'd like to add several tags with the same key. In the most cases this
no good practice, but with urls it makes sense, e.g. to add several
images to one feature.
This was never supported by JOSM, and while it is
2009/4/2 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Jueves, 2 de Abril de 2009, Will Nordin escribió:
I am trying to convert the planet-090319.osm (approx 107GB) to gml. I've
tried the Java and Python solutions, but both end up thorwing OutOfMemory
exceptions.
Man,
Matt Amos wrote:
2009/4/2 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Jueves, 2 de Abril de 2009, Will Nordin escribió:
I am trying to convert the planet-090319.osm (approx 107GB) to gml. I've
tried the Java and Python solutions, but both end up thorwing OutOfMemory
Dave Stubbs wrote:
And while currently possible in the database, it doesn't work in the
current API, so you can't actually enter them :-)
Just download an object, duplicate the tag and reupload. Sounds pretty
possible to me :)
In a few weeks time it just becomes official, and any existing
Hi,
every now and then I have the need to check what did user X do in
the last days/weeks/month, or where was he active.
We will one day have great changeset-based tools to help us with this,
and if I have a clue about where the user is active then I could also
use the ITO Mapper of
2009/4/2 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
Matt Amos wrote:
so you'd need to either store
all the node locations in ram or some external indexed format... which
is exactly what osm2pgsql does :-)
mmap the node table in array index form to disk, that will work because of
hole allocation,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
And while currently possible in the database, it doesn't work in the
current API, so you can't actually enter them :-)
Just download an object, duplicate the tag and reupload. Sounds pretty
possible
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Does anyone have any timings on importing the current planet.osm in
PostgreSQL with any tool available? Using lets say 8GB of ram and
'typical' disk?
I don't have full numbers but I do have some figures which may be useful.
Early in January Jochen Topf did some
Matt Amos wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
And while currently possible in the database, it doesn't work in the
current API, so you can't actually enter them :-)
Just download an object, duplicate the tag and reupload. Sounds
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Matt Amos wrote:
the API uses a hash and disallows repeated tags on ways and relations.
but it uses a list for nodes, so you can easily get duplicate tags by
the method you describe.
Interesting; I am not convinced but
The convention is to separate multiple values for the same key with a
semicolon.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org]
On Behalf Of Andreas Kalsch
Sent: 02 April 2009 8:03 PM
To: dev@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-dev]
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
actually I would map the building (closed way) and 2 nodes within at
their actual position for postbox and atm, or is it a combined postbox
and atm?
exactly one above the other in the wall, like:
--
| ATM |
|-
| postbox |
---
regards
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
I think stitching is something that is lets say 'available', referencing
images is too. But I would really love to see some thing like robust
+1
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
The convention is to separate multiple values for the same key with a
semicolon.
...and that semantical addition breaks querying for any tool [including
your database] that follows context free grammar. XML well defines
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
Best ist to add your patches to a trac ticket. This way they aren't
overlooked.
Sorry, I optimistically assumed that such a simple patch could be applied
right away. Time to learn Trac then. :-)
Sometimes. But usually a bit review is nevertheless
Hi,
currently, you have to configure the API version that JOSM should
use, and you can configure a number of additional version numbers that
JOSM will accept on input.
Which is quite stupid to make configurable, because it's all in the code
- no matter what you configure, you will not be
23 matches
Mail list logo
