Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 wiki page

2009-04-20 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Lars Francke wrote: > I documented what I found in the code. This sometimes varied from the > documentation on the wiki page but as the API will be live in a few > hours I think this is the way to go. The wiki page can be updated when > the code is updated. You could probably save some work i

[OSM-dev] webservice to collect traffic messages

2009-04-20 Thread marcus.wolschon
Hello, I'd like to experiment with Google AppEngine for a bit and set up a hosted service to collect traffic messages (traffic jams, road obstructions, constructions sites, slow moving traffic,...) What could be a good data-format for such information, so that it is usefull to more then just my

Re: [OSM-dev] Routino - a router for OpenStreetMap data

2009-04-20 Thread Steve Hosgood
Claudius wrote: > Am 16.04.2009 18:52, Andrew M. Bishop: > >> An online demonstration of the router for the UK is available as well: >> >> http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/router/router.html >> > > The map div of your demo page doesn't show at all in Opera browser. This > is probably cau

Re: [OSM-dev] webservice to collect traffic messages

2009-04-20 Thread Greg Troxel
writes: > I'd like to experiment with Google AppEngine for a bit and > set up a hosted service to collect traffic messages > (traffic jams, road obstructions, constructions sites, slow > moving traffic,...) I'm not sure how you're intending to use this, but I'm guessing peer reports of issues f

Re: [OSM-dev] webservice to collect traffic messages

2009-04-20 Thread marcus.wolschon
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:56:13 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > writes: > >> I'd like to experiment with Google AppEngine for a bit and >> set up a hosted service to collect traffic messages >> (traffic jams, road obstructions, constructions sites, slow >> moving traffic,...) > > I'm not sure how you'

Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 wiki page

2009-04-20 Thread Lars Francke
I finished most of the methods now. Some may be incomplete but...well..work in progress ;-) A few comments though: - The changeset methods allow multiple XML elements and the resulting changeset will be a combination of them all. The node/way/element methods allow multiple elements, too but they

Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 wiki page

2009-04-20 Thread Lars Francke
>  - In routes.rb there is no api/0.6/relation/:id/:version to retrieve > an old version of a relation but all the neccessary methods are there > (old_relation_controller#version) but there is a type (see attached > diff) type -> typo >  - For "ways for node" and "relations for element" there is

Re: [OSM-dev] webservice to collect traffic messages

2009-04-20 Thread Floris Looijesteijn
maybe also include a (optional) last modified date for the id's so you can check if they have been changed? road construction can take a long time. when osm-er changes the road that might be the new situation. greetings, floris > > Hello, > > I'd like to experiment with Google AppEngine for a b

Re: [OSM-dev] [Routing] webservice to collect traffic messages

2009-04-20 Thread Doru Julian Bugariu
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com schrieb: > I'm thinking about: + Use a cool name: "OTM" OpenTrafficMessages + Version of protocol > * required: (enum) event-type > * required: (string) event-description Isn't that redundant to event-type? > * required: (long) OSM WayID of primary location > * r

Re: [OSM-dev] Routino - a router for OpenStreetMap data

2009-04-20 Thread Andrew M. Bishop
Steve Hosgood writes: > Claudius wrote: >> Am 16.04.2009 18:52, Andrew M. Bishop: >> >>> An online demonstration of the router for the UK is available as well: >>> >>> http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/router/router.html >> The map div of your demo page doesn't show at all in Opera browser.

Re: [OSM-dev] API 0.6 wiki page

2009-04-20 Thread Lars Francke
>  - In routes.rb there is no api/0.6/relation/:id/:version to retrieve > an old version of a relation but all the neccessary methods are there > (old_relation_controller#version) but there is a type (see attached > diff) I see that someone by the name of "smsm1" has fixed a typo. Unfortunately it

[OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Michael Willigens
Hi osm devlist, I just wanted to tell you that i implemented a NameFinder API in Java because i didnt find anything useful. It will run on both, J2SE and ME. Anyone intereseted in this? Shall I contribute it in SVN, and whats the email address of David-Earl ? regards, Michael Willigens ___

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Grant Slater
Sounds interesting. Tell us more. Memory Requirements, Concurrency, Query handling, API? etc. / Grant Michael Willigens wrote: > Hi osm devlist, > > I just wanted to tell you that i implemented a NameFinder API in Java > because i didnt find anything useful. It will run on both, J2SE and > M

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Grant Slater wrote: > Sounds interesting. > Tell us more. Memory Requirements, Concurrency, Query handling, API? etc. I think he meant to say he has implemented a client...? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" __

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Michael Willigens
Well, Concurrency: yes, it can use the calling thread OR it can instantiate new thread that will return the result when available to an callback interface. So anything is thread save here. Memory: Havent tested yet, because i think that parsing small XML files is also possible on J2ME. "Cou

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Grant Slater
Frederik Ramm wrote: >> Sounds interesting. >> Tell us more. Memory Requirements, Concurrency, Query handling, API? >> etc. > I think he meant to say he has implemented a client...? Damn. Namefinder development seems to have taken a break for awhile... Devs: Got mad coding skillz? Namefinder is

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Ian Dees
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Grant Slater wrote: > Namefinder development seems to have taken a break for awhile... > Devs: Got mad coding skillz? Namefinder is ripe for improvement or > replacement. > > There has been talk of holding a virtual or physical meet to discuss... > > Anyone interes

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Grant Slater wrote: > Namefinder development seems to have taken a break for awhile... > Devs: Got mad coding skillz? Namefinder is ripe for improvement or > replacement. > > There has been talk of holding a virtual or physical meet to discuss... There were, I think, a number of people who

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 20 Apr 2009, at 22:59, Grant Slater wrote: > Frederik Ramm wrote: >>> Sounds interesting. >>> Tell us more. Memory Requirements, Concurrency, Query handling, API? >>> etc. >> I think he meant to say he has implemented a client...? > > Damn. > > Namefinder development seems to have taken a brea

Re: [OSM-dev] [Routing] webservice to collect traffic messages

2009-04-20 Thread marcus.wolschon
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:46:38 +0200, Doru Julian Bugariu wrote: > marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com schrieb: > >> I'm thinking about: > > + Use a cool name: "OTM" OpenTrafficMessages > + Version of protocol > >> * required: (enum) event-type >> * required: (string) event-description > > Isn't that

Re: [OSM-dev] implemented API for J2SE and J2ME

2009-04-20 Thread marcus.wolschon
Well, sounds nice. Where is it? Marcus On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:55:59 +0200, Michael Willigens wrote: > Well, > > Concurrency: yes, it can use the calling thread OR it can instantiate > new thread that > will return the result when available to an callback interface. So > anything is thread

[OSM-dev] contribution and usage of maps

2009-04-20 Thread Mohamad Ali
Hi Guys, I would like to ask some questions, 1. How can we contribute to update your maps in Australia? 2. How can we use openstreetmap data and maps on our server? 3. For how long can we use those maps will stay for free? I think we can contribute a lot for what you