The plan is to make it an opt-in on the account page shortly per the rollout
plan.
And then make it a simple extract updated on a regular basis for this type of
analysis.
j
-Original Message-
From: Peter Körner [mailto:osm-li...@mazdermind.de]
Sent: 10 August 2010 07:01
To: Jim Bro
Am 09.08.2010 23:27, schrieb Jim Brown:
and a feed of the userids of those who have accepted the new
terms and conditions (also updated over time)
Wehre do you plan to get this from? I thought about developing a web-app
that connects to the OSM Page using OAuth and allows users that have not
ye
hi scott,
what has changed since the beginnning?
the only thing that I would like to see is some form of tree structure
being possible, we should consider that the quadtree can be
implemented using the protobuf for an optimal random access.
all the best,
mike
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Scott
Hi Jeffrey,
On 10 August 2010 04:17, Jeffrey Warren wrote:
> yes, google maps is a reference design - the code accepts any TMS. I'm going
> to add a few public domain options (USGS National Map is good within the US,
> for example) and an arbitrary TMS/WMS input.
Thanks, that would be ideal. I
yes, google maps is a reference design - the code accepts any TMS. I'm going
to add a few public domain options (USGS National Map is good within the US,
for example) and an arbitrary TMS/WMS input.
Though i do wonder if there's ownership precedent for derived
orthorectification... makes sense, bu
This item has been resolved. I switched to from Mac OSX 10.6 to ubuntu
for improved success, following directions with minor improv at:
http://trac.mapnik.org/wiki/UbuntuInstallation
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.o
On 4 August 2010 15:14, Jeffrey Warren wrote:
> Therefore you can now use aerial images from balloons or kites (or whatever!
> slingshots!) to stitch a map, then export it for printing or import it into
> many other geospatial tools. All in the browser, no plugins.
> That last one, TMS, means you
Hi Scott,
I won't have time to do much today, but I've added a couple of comments
below.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Scott Crosby wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Brett Henderson wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Scott Crosby
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:
Hi,
On 9 August 2010 23:27, Jim Brown wrote:
> and for each row/object type show:
>
> # objects in db as of last update
> # tags in db as of last update
> # objects totally clean (all editors in the history have accepted)
> # objects initial editor accepted
> # objects clean so far (no editors ha
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:51 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> Hi, ist there any documentation of the binary format changes?
> I have implemented a c++ reader using protobuf, would update that if
> there is a new format spec.
> mike
No real docs. There are some tweaks on the edges with r
Hi,
I'm working in an approach model the impact of the acceptance of the new
contributor terms on the data. I wanted to kick this around the dev list and
see what people thought of the approach as I get it going...
ASSUMPTIONS:
It should be noted to start with, that edits by bots do not requir
As I'm in the process of packaging the osm binary format for packaging
as part of osmosis, I expect that it may start get used fairly soon.
Like any fileformat, the binary format requires a schema which will be
hard to change. Before finalizing it, I would like to run my schema
design past stakeho
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Brett Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Scott Crosby wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Brett Henderson wrote:
>>
> If we go down this path I need two things:
> 1. A versioned jar file containing all re-usable code. Scott, can you ta
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Scott Crosby wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to announce code implementing a binary OSM format that
> supports the full semantics of the OSM XML. It is 5x-10x faster at
> reading and writing and 30-50% smaller; an entire planet, including
> all metadata, can be r
25or6to4 wrote:
Hi all,
I have a revert request on
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5441813. For some reason JOSM
cut out on me, and before checking, I reuploaded a section. Now I seem to
have dupe ways and unlabeled points. Any thoughts on where I went wrong?
You can revert it
Hi all,
I have a revert request on
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5441813. For some reason JOSM
cut out on me, and before checking, I reuploaded a section. Now I seem to
have dupe ways and unlabeled points. Any thoughts on where I went wrong?
Thanks.
Jason
--
View this messag
16 matches
Mail list logo
