Hi Jim,
nice idea. The code could also be reused for the revert scripts in case
some Teleatlas data has to be removed aagain.
Jim Brown wrote:
* Where geometries have changed:
o If the object has a prior version, take the prior version of
the geometry and then apply
Hi,
I'm new to OpenStreetMaps, and I'm not sure if this is the right forum
to ask questions about this topic.
I saw an initiative about airspace mapping here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Airspace
I wonder how aviation maps would be defined / managed / handled from a
tech
Hi,
Ákos Maróy wrote:
I wonder how aviation maps would be defined / managed / handled from a
technical perspective using the OpenStreetMaps framework. What are the
steps to make this happen?
The general answer is you need someone to record the data (using
appropriate tagging - no need to reco
If you have a source of data that can be used, then entering that into
openstreetmap is usually trivial. Getting the data tends to be the
problem.
For example I have a converter for [some elements of] ARINC424 data,
although it's not legally possible to upload the results.
__
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> In general, OSM tries to follow the "on the ground rule", i.e. we want to
> record stuff that can be easily seen and cross-checked by other mappers.
> Airspace tends to not fall in this category so it will be difficult. Also
> there is no
On 11/08/10 13:33, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Ákos Maróy wrote:
I wonder how aviation maps would be defined / managed / handled from a
technical perspective using the OpenStreetMaps framework. What are the
steps to make this happen?
The general answer is you need someone to record the data (using
a
On 11 August 2010 23:28, Tom Hughes wrote:
> I thought the general consensus was to not to add airspace data actually...
I thought it was flight paths?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
I thought the general consensus was to not to add airspace data actually...
I thought it was flight paths?
Personally I think that both are useless and will make normal editing
more difficult. I could see *slighly* more of a case for airspace
(because that tends to ch
Dear Frederik, OJ, Pieren & Tom,
Thank you for your quick responses in the subject.
Maybe I'm using bad terminology, as I'm new to OSM in general, so let me
try to line out what I was thinking about, before trying to react to
what you write specifically. Please correct my terminology if I'm
misus
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Ákos Maróy wrote:
> totally agree - I would put all this into a separate database. BTW, how
> would one set up his own OSM online database for such a purpose?
Have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/The_Rails_Port to get started.
Cheers,
Andy
An argument for creating at least a "sister project" to OSM for airspace
mapping is that, in the USA at least, FAA regulations limit the operation of
kites and balloons based on airspace. If projects like OpenAerialMap and
Cartagen are to take off (pardon the pun), access to air space information
w
On 11 August 2010 23:38, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Personally I think that both are useless and will make normal editing more
> difficult. I could see *slighly* more of a case for airspace (because that
This is a bigger issue of the API and editors to a lesser extent,
always downloading/displaying e
Ákos,
We talked about an OpenAeroMap with Ivan Sanchez back in Amsterdam
(SoTM2009), but when Ivan told the crowd about the idea, the reception
went from simple skepticism to total disagreement (security issues
being one of the main reasons).
Anyway, I started using man_made=beacon tags long befo
Andy,
On 11/08/10 17:54, Andy Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Ákos Maróy wrote:
>
>> totally agree - I would put all this into a separate database. BTW, how
>> would one set up his own OSM online database for such a purpose?
>
> Have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/
El día Wednesday 11 August 2010 18:25:39, Julio Costa Zambelli dijo:
> We talked about an OpenAeroMap with Ivan Sanchez back in Amsterdam
> (SoTM2009),
And I've still got the idea somewhere in my notebooks. I haven't forgotten
about that :-)
I do think that OSM-derived aerial navigational charts
Eric,
On 11/08/10 18:09, Eric Wolf wrote:
> An argument for creating at least a "sister project" to OSM for airspace
> mapping is that, in the USA at least, FAA regulations limit the
> operation of kites and balloons based on airspace. If projects like
> OpenAerialMap and Cartagen are to take off
Julio,
> We talked about an OpenAeroMap with Ivan Sanchez back in Amsterdam
> (SoTM2009), but when Ivan told the crowd about the idea, the reception
> went from simple skepticism to total disagreement (security issues
> being one of the main reasons).
oh my :) well, let's leave the security skept
Ivan,
On 11/08/10 18:52, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El día Wednesday 11 August 2010 18:25:39, Julio Costa Zambelli dijo:
>> We talked about an OpenAeroMap with Ivan Sanchez back in Amsterdam
>> (SoTM2009),
>
> And I've still got the idea somewhere in my notebooks. I haven't forgotten
> about t
Will have to jump in with a full response later, but have any of you
checked out AIXM?
http://www.aixm.aero/public/subsite_homepage/homepage.html
Also note that in some (many!) countries the Civil Aviation
Authorities are privatized and they claim absolute copyright over the
aviation data for tha
Jeffrey,
On 11/08/10 19:15, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> Will have to jump in with a full response later, but have any of you
> checked out AIXM?
>
> http://www.aixm.aero/public/subsite_homepage/homepage.html
yes, I'am aware of the AIXM format, and the eAIP publications that are
made using these for
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Ákos Maróy wrote:
> what I still don't understand is, and sorry for being so
> un-knowledgable, is how the rendering process is handled - from
> vector-based OSM map definitions to map tiles.
It's completely separate from the editing stack. The most common way
to
Ákos Maróy wrote:
in Europe at least, airspace information is freely available, and I'm
sure the US is no different. anyone can get VFR and IFR airspace maps,
either from the appropriate government agency (FAA, Eurocontrol), or
from commercial vendors like Jeppesen.
The general aviation chart
>> Also note that in some (many!) countries the Civil Aviation
>> Authorities are privatized and they claim absolute copyright over the
>> aviation data for that country. Beware the nasty cease and desist
>> letter, I received them in the past.
>
> yes, I'm aware of that. OTOH, it's usually not the
Chris,
On 11/08/10 19:28, Chris Hill wrote:
> Ákos Maróy wrote:
>> in Europe at least, airspace information is freely available, and I'm
>> sure the US is no different. anyone can get VFR and IFR airspace maps,
>> either from the appropriate government agency (FAA, Eurocontrol), or
>> from commerc
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Ákos Maróy wrote:
> in Europe at least, airspace information is freely available
Like this?
http://www.nats-uk.ead-it.com/public/index.php%3Foption=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=167&Itemid=220.html
___
dev mailing l
Jeff,
> Just note that these things (airspace, route structures, waypoints
> etc) change, and there is a *very* specific schedule that they must
> change on this is all very tightly controlled and defined. If your aim
> is to do this for fun, much of that is not important, OTOH, if you
> intend fo
On 11/08/10 19:29, OJ W wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Ákos Maróy wrote:
>> in Europe at least, airspace information is freely available
>
> Like this?
>
> http://www.nats-uk.ead-it.com/public/index.php%3Foption=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=167&Itemid=220.html
correct, like that
Hi,
X-Plane project has lots of free aerial charts, see
http://data.x-plane.com/
I have checked some years ago a few of the Finnish airports and at least
in that sample the quality was excellent. License is not OSM compatible
(GPL). This is what the author says about the license:
" In summary, m
Jukka,
> X-Plane project has lots of free aerial charts, see
> http://data.x-plane.com/
>
> I have checked some years ago a few of the Finnish airports and at least
> in that sample the quality was excellent. License is not OSM compatible
> (GPL). This is what the author says about the license:
2010/8/11 Iván Sánchez Ortega :
>
> Ooohh, complete with the "we claim this slice off Antarctica". You know that's
> ripe ground for edit wars, right? :-P
>
Off course ;)
It's kind of funny but I didn't knew that we actually control the
aerial space of our exact antarctic claim (53° to 90°) from P
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Ákos Maróy wrote:
> oh my :) well, let's leave the security skeptics for themselves. in
> general, aviation maps are as basic a necessity for safe transportation
> as road maps and road signs are. and they are freely available to
> anyone, who is willing to buy su
Oh, I forgot to mention that yesterday I finally bought (here in
Chile, after the company that was supposed to import other plane from
the US failed to deliver) the plane for the OSM Drone
(http://www.mirax.cl/detalles.php?codigo=89356).
I will try to finish the assembly before the weekend to test
Hi all
I would like to display an old version of a way on a map
To load the data of a way I use:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/50191466/full
To get an old version of the way I use
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/50191466/1 (version 1)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:11:09 +0200, Ákos Maróy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to OpenStreetMaps, and I'm not sure if this is the right forum
> to ask questions about this topic.
>
> I saw an initiative about airspace mapping here:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Airspace
>
> I
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:06 PM, bernhard zwischenbrugger
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I would like to display an old version of a way on a map
> To load the data of a way I use:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/50191466/full
>
> To get an old version of the way I use
> http://www.openstreetmap.
Hi,
bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
Is there a way to get a full way for an old version?
It is complicated because matching nodes have to be retrieved. The XAPI
can do it, see:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2009-December/017839.html
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail
The OSM Drone assembly process:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/julio_costa/4883850094/
2010/8/11 Julio Costa Zambelli :
> Oh, I forgot to mention that yesterday I finally bought (here in
> Chile, after the company that was supposed to import other plane from
> the US failed to deliver) the plane for
Am 12.08.2010 00:39, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
Is there a way to get a full way for an old version?
It is complicated because matching nodes have to be retrieved. The XAPI
can do it, see:
Its the no. 1 show stopper for a history viewer -- for obvious reasons
38 matches
Mail list logo
