Am 28.04.2011 16:11, schrieb Oliver Tonnhofer:
On 28.04.2011, at 16:00, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Interesting, this totally uproots my firm conviction that SAX parsing is always
more time- and memory-efficient than tree/DOM-based parsing.
From my experience the expat-sax immplementation is fast
On 28.04.2011, at 16:00, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Interesting, this totally uproots my firm conviction that SAX parsing is
> always more time- and memory-efficient than tree/DOM-based parsing.
Sure. DOM based parser need to keep the whole tree in memory which doesn't work
well with large XML f
On 4/28/11 2:58 PM, Oliver Tonnhofer wrote:
On 28.04.2011, at 14:46, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Oliver Tonnhofer wrote:
If you are using Python, you should use iterparse from the ElementTree API, it
is much nicer and faster.
Faster than SAX? I'm not so sure.
On 28.04.2011, at 14:46, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Oliver Tonnhofer wrote:
>
>> If you are using Python, you should use iterparse from the ElementTree API,
>> it is much nicer and faster.
>
> Faster than SAX? I'm not so sure. SAX calls the C directly.
Here i
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Oliver Tonnhofer wrote:
> If you are using Python, you should use iterparse from the ElementTree API,
> it is much nicer and faster.
Faster than SAX? I'm not so sure. SAX calls the C directly.
The technique used in iterparse is the same as in SAX parsing, and t
On 28.04.2011, at 13:57, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
>> What kind of processing were you doing? I'm assuming some kind of XML
>> (unless you were using the protobuffs). If thats the case, you can use
>> a simple SAX parser. If you need an example, I'll send you one.
>
> Yes i preprocess XML to ex
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> > Yes, but they are huge...
> > My original place=* for france is 50 MB (not compressed).
>
> 50 meg doesn't seem so big.
Yes 50MB is fine. 2 GB (compressed) is huge.
> > France extract if 2 GB compressed, i don't think my python script was
> > able to handle such a h
#3727: Cannot change role of a member of a route relation in simple mode
---+
Reporter: monxton| Owner: potlatch-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Markus Wagner wrote:
> After vacuuming and fiddling with those values I am much closer to
> realtime. Currently at approx ~120% of realtime. So I think, there is
> hope, once I get faster disks.
I'm reopening this thread because I have a very simular Problem and I
suspect that this could be an i
9 matches
Mail list logo
