Hi Michael,
On 21.09.2011 00:04, Igor Podolskiy wrote:
On 20.09.2011 22:50, Michael Prinzing wrote:
Now, there is an empty bounding box, and the timestamps are far in
the past (looks like an integer of -1 converted to a timestamp to me).
[...]
I could reproduce the empty bounding box problem,
Hello everybody,
A question to all maintainers of OSM XML processing software: What
combinations of root tag attributes do you expect for XML with and without
meta data?
If I deliver from Overpass API to JOSM the XML data with meta data and with a
plain osm tag, JOSM crashes with a
Hi!
You already asked this on Sep 1, and I told you then that we might be able to
help you if you post your code. We are not magicians you know!
Jochen
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:57:15AM -0400, Pris Matic wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:57:15 -0400
From: Pris Matic
Sorry!
I totally forgot I had already asked this :)
http://pastebin.com/GjtgqzkP - osmium handler header
http://pastebin.com/75JUT824 - osmium handler source
http://pastebin.com/bSpGj0Ez - main.cpp
It should be possible to just run this on any map file as long as you set
the bounding box
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
Hi.
Please don't cross post.
If I deliver from Overpass API to JOSM the XML data with meta data and with a
plain osm tag, JOSM crashes with a NullPointerException on the first version
attribute.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote:
JOSM and Osmosis both
complain about the absence of version attributes on the individual OSM
elements for data without meta data.
Having OSM data with or without meta data is really a useful feature. The same
data
Hi,
On 09/21/11 13:13, Erik Johansson wrote:
A bit off topic: I just tried overpass and was surprised that the
default seems to be to strip the version and date, I'm not so keen on
that feature.
Thinking about this, I like the stripping of the version number.
We're having a lot of trouble
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Not serving the version number on XAPI, Overpass and others
would send a clear signal that these services are not to be used for
editing.
Doing so also precludes merging results with any existing OSM database
though.
Hi,
On 09/21/11 14:01, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Doing so also precludes merging results with any existing OSM database
though. You can't have an extract then update via a service which
strips version numbers.
If you need versions in your extract. If your extract is supposed to
contain only
I'm concerned that there's a view that we should be stripping out data
from these resources in order for them to be crippled in one way or
another as per another thread.
I'm surprised at Frederik's view that this is a good idea.
Will Geofabrik start stripping out this information from the
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
OSM objects are identified by three identifiers:
Object Type, ID and Version
Those three identifiers are necessary when talking about an OSM
object. Absence of one of them means the data isn't valid. The
type and ID are obvious, but the version number appears to be
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Thinking about this, I like the stripping of the version number.
We're having a lot of trouble with people doing mass edits by using XAPI
etc. to download e.g. everything with name=McDonalds world-wide and
I think this might be the right list for this.
mike
-- Forwarded message --
From: Besfort Guri besig...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:07 PM
Subject: [Talk-kosovo] I need help
To: talk-kos...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi I am trying to see the reverse geo
A requirement of my application is to be able to do geocoding (street address
to lon/lat) and reverse geocoding (lon/lat to nearby street address) without an
internet connection, mainly for the United States.
I am trying to find the best source of data for this. I can use the 2010 TIGER
files,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Thinking about this, I like the stripping of the version number.
We're having a lot of trouble with people doing mass edits by using XAPI
etc. to
Is Overpass so geared for tools that don't care about
uid/date/version/visible etc?
Actually, yes. Note that these tools include map rendering, routing, location
based search and probably every other tool that consumes the data. The data
model is: the state of the Planet database (or an
On 09/19/2011 05:33 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Paul Hartmann wrote:
Why is it called pixelPerDegree in ImageryInfo? Apparently, the value
is in pixels per unit in projected space (pixelPerEastNorth).
Which is nonsense as well. It should not be relative to projected
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Paul Hartmann wrote:
Why is it called pixelPerDegree in ImageryInfo? Apparently, the value
is in pixels per unit in projected space (pixelPerEastNorth).
Which is nonsense as well. It should not be relative to projected
coordinates.
What is the alternative?
I don't
18 matches
Mail list logo
