On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Tom,
Tom Hughes wrote:
Also, I read from the foundation meeting minutes that the code to
handle the technical side of the planned license change has already
been mostly completed
[...]
80n wrote:
There has been no discussion of a PD option at any of the OSMF
board meetings that I have attended (I don't think I've missed any),
and no mention in any of the minutes from the License Working
Group.
So, as far as I know, the answer is that the only options that have
been
Previous message appears to have been borked by a combination of
Nabble/Mailman's dodgy header-detecting logic. Sorry if you only got half of
it.
goldie_lookin_chain_impersonating_john_peel
I'll try again...
/glcetc.
Steve, Andy and I discussed it (as the 'licence working group' of the day,
Sigh. It wasn't even that good first time round. Very sorry.
Here it is _without_ a line beginning 'From'.
Steve, Andy and I discussed it (as the 'licence working group' of the day,
though without the title) last year.
IIRC, I thought it would be a valuable piece of inclusion - helping a
Tom,
Tom Hughes wrote:
Also, I read from the foundation meeting minutes that the code to
handle the technical side of the planned license change has already
been mostly completed
[...]
There is some code on my hard disk that I will be working on completing
over the next few weeks. As it
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Tom,
Tom Hughes wrote:
Also, I read from the foundation meeting minutes that the code to
handle the technical side of the planned license change has already
been mostly completed
[...]
There is some code on my hard disk that I will be working on
completing
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
Does your code take into account the plan that people should have the
option of saying no, yes, and yes and by the way all my data is
PD anyway?
It implements the Foundation's relicensing plan - you'll have to discuss
the details of that with the Foundation.
Sigh.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But could you perhaps check your code and see whether you have an option
in there that allows the user not only to select agree/disagree but also
the third option, agree and PD. And if such an option is not in there,
Simone Cortesi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But could you perhaps check your code and see whether you have an option
in there that allows the user not only to select agree/disagree but also
the third option, agree and PD. And if such an
Hi,
I was looking for the source code that is behind the
www.openstreetmap.org/browse functionality but could not find it. I'm
not a rails expert but I think that since I cannot find anything in
config/routes.rb, it is probably not implemented in rails, is it?
The reason is that I want to
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I was looking for the source code that is behind the
www.openstreetmap.org/browse functionality but could not find it. I'm
not a rails expert but I think that since I cannot find anything in
config/routes.rb, it is probably not implemented in rails, is it?
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/sites/rails_port_branches/api06/app/controllers/browse_controller.rb
2009/2/3 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
I was looking for the source code that is behind the
www.openstreetmap.org/browse functionality but could not find it. I'm
not a rails
12 matches
Mail list logo
