Please don't cross-post on multiple mailing lists.
It will be part of OVS 2.4. We haven't branched for it yet, but we hope to do
that in the next few weeks. The release will be some weeks after that.
--Justin
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 10:39 PM, Neelakantam Gaddam wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Which O
A bold promise, I know...
But i've recently discovered an absolutely GUARANTEED
method for getting ANY woman into your bed.
FAST
And the best part is, you can use it TONIGHT to get laid.
Click Here To Discover The Secret (Free Video) http://urla.ru/1HZP
<-
Videos comes down to
Hi All,
Which OVS version supports Geneve protocol? I did not see Geneve support in
2.3.1. Currently, Geneve is part of master branch. When can I expect
Geneve part of OVS official release?
--
Thanks & Regards
Neelakantam Gaddam
___
dev mailing lis
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:16:04PM -0800, Alex Wang wrote:
> I found the issue but not the root cause,
>
> turns out, the autotest really does not like opening 'interactive shell'
> inside the
> AT_CHECK. The test hangs at (in function _ovs_vsctl_get_PS1):
>
> """
> v="$(bash --norc --noprofile
This video gives you the keys to the "desire center" of any woman's mind:
Watch The Video Now http://urla.ru/1HZi
When you watch the shocking free video you will discover
-1 Weird Trick For Making Any Woman Wet
-3 Magic Words That Make Women Horny
-How To Use Innocent Questions To Make Her F
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:12:33PM -0800, Ansis Atteka wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:54:42AM -0800, Ansis Atteka wrote:
> >> Until now "ovs-ofctl add-flows ..." command sent each OFPC_ADD
> >> request one by one accompanied with a barrier
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:19:16AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > Until now "ovs-ofctl add-flows ..." command sent each OFPC_ADD
> > request one by one accompanied with a barrier request. This
> > meant that before ovs-ofctl could send next OFPC_ADD request
> > it had to wait for a barrier res
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:33:57PM -0800, Ansis Atteka wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Until now, if both STP and RSTP were enabled, ovs-vswitchd would actually
> > enable only the one it first noticed to be enabled, and actually turn off
> > the setting for the othe
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:31:14AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:40:44AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> > I've explained this a lot over the years.
> >>
On 03/05/2015 11:13 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:24:28PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> The default_gw attribute of a logical router was defined as an IP
>> address in ovn-nb.xml, but as a boolean in ovn-nb.ovsschema. Fix the
>> schema to reflect that this is an IP address.
>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:24:28PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
> The default_gw attribute of a logical router was defined as an IP
> address in ovn-nb.xml, but as a boolean in ovn-nb.ovsschema. Fix the
> schema to reflect that this is an IP address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant
I think th
Natural aphrodisiacs have helped hundreds of people solve their problems!
http://urla.ru/1HzF
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dear user dev@openvswitch.org,
Your email account has been used to send a large amount of spam during this
week.
Most likely your computer was infected by a recent virus and now runs a
trojaned proxy server.
Please follow instruction in order to keep your computer safe.
Have a nice day,
openvs
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:45:11AM +1100, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> Heads up...
>
> We've hit this BUG() in v3.10.70, v3.14.27 and v3.18.7:
>
> net/core/skbuff.c:
> 1027 int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
> 1028 gfp_t gfp_mask)
> 1029 {
> 1030
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:56:41PM -0500, Xu (Simon) Chen wrote:
> Now I think about it... Maybe I run into this problem because I turned on
> Sflow collection on my OVS nodes...
Yes, I was also running sflow collection. I think the bug will only bite
when doing sflow collection because it's the s
If you dont want to go under the knife for a chance of restored potency, try
this drug!
http://urla.ru/1HBy
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
According to the statistics, the problem of impotence concerns 21% of the
stronger sex aged 20-30.
http://x.co/7q9Kg
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
The default_gw attribute of a logical router was defined as an IP
address in ovn-nb.xml, but as a boolean in ovn-nb.ovsschema. Fix the
schema to reflect that this is an IP address.
Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant
---
ovn/ovn-nb.ovsschema | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
> Until now "ovs-ofctl add-flows ..." command sent each OFPC_ADD
> request one by one accompanied with a barrier request. This
> meant that before ovs-ofctl could send next OFPC_ADD request
> it had to wait for a barrier response that was sent together
> with previous OFPC_ADD request.
>
> After
I found the issue but not the root cause,
turns out, the autotest really does not like opening 'interactive shell'
inside the
AT_CHECK. The test hangs at (in function _ovs_vsctl_get_PS1):
"""
v="$(bash --norc --noprofile -i 2>&1 <<< $'PS1=\"'"$myPS1"$'\" \n# Begin
prompt\n# End prompt')"
"""
Un
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:54:42AM -0800, Ansis Atteka wrote:
>> Until now "ovs-ofctl add-flows ..." command sent each OFPC_ADD
>> request one by one accompanied with a barrier request. This
>> meant that before ovs-ofctl could send next OFPC_ADD
Cool, I'll adopt the change and resend patches,
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Peter Amidon wrote:
> These changes all look good to me, I really like the unit32_t-as-a-stack
> idea.
>
> ---Peter
>
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 21:41:11 -0800: Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 08:48:59
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Until now, if both STP and RSTP were enabled, ovs-vswitchd would actually
> enable only the one it first noticed to be enabled, and actually turn off
> the setting for the other one in the database (!). This doesn't match
> ovs-vswitchd behavior
Can you get laid using the magic words in this video?
Click Here To Find Out http://urla.ru/1HYZ
This shocking free video shows you how to make any
girl want to fuck you in 60 seconds or less.
Just say the magic words
And any woman is yours.
100% of the time.
Click Here To Watch The Video
On 03/05/2015 03:28 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> The design was come up after inputs and discussions with multiple
> people, including (in alphabetical order) Aaron Rosen, Ben Pfaff,
> Ganesan Chandrashekhar, Justin Pettit and Somik Behera. There
> are still some chinks around the OVN schema that
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:58:08PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> [...]
>
> >>>Doesn't this imply two entities to be independently managing the same
> >>>physical resource? If so, this raises questions of how the resource
> >>>would be partitioned between them? How are conflicting requests
> >>>be
Do you know how to make any girl horny for you?
This Video Shows You How http://hop.kz/4Zhu
Just watch the video, use the tips, and start banging between
5 and 7 girls every week.
If you want to use the tips to get a loyal dedicated girlfriend,
you can use it for that too.
And when you use this
Hello,
I need new match options for my openvswitch. I have already sorted out the
flow_mod message handling and everything. Now, I need to find where the
match is performed, but I cannot find it. Through debugging, I found that
the matching is performed (or part of it) at miniflow_extract() at
lib
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> [moving to ovs-dev, hope that's OK]
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 03:52:42PM +, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>> It looks like there have been no emails for a while.
>> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/build/
>
> Hmm, looking at travis, there are
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 01:59:51PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > Hmm, looking at travis, there are definitely builds going, and some of
> > them are failing, so it's either that travis isn't sending emails or
> > that the list is not accepting them. Thomas, I seem to recall that you
> > set
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:58:33PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>
>> I checked out a new tree and applied the patch, and it worked fine for me.
>> I didn't move "vtep/vtep.ovsschema" from where it was before the patch, so I
>> don't know why
> Hmm, looking at travis, there are definitely builds going, and some of
> them are failing, so it's either that travis isn't sending emails or
> that the list is not accepting them. Thomas, I seem to recall that you
> set up travis to send the emails; does anything need to change in that
> setup?
This patch adds support for a new port type to userspace datapath
called dpdkvhost. This allows KVM (QEMU) to offload the servicing
of virtio-net devices to its associated dpdkvhost port. Instructions
for use are in INSTALL.DPDK.
This has been tested on Intel multi-core platforms and with clients
The design was come up after inputs and discussions with multiple
people, including (in alphabetical order) Aaron Rosen, Ben Pfaff,
Ganesan Chandrashekhar, Justin Pettit and Somik Behera. There
are still some chinks around the OVN schema that needs to be
sorted out. So this is a early version.
Sig
A bold promise, I know...
But i've recently discovered an absolutely GUARANTEED
method for getting ANY woman into your bed.
FAST
And the best part is, you can use it TONIGHT to get laid.
Click Here To Discover The Secret (Free Video) http://hop.kz/4Zh0
<-
Videos comes down tonight
Learn some useful lessons of being an awesome mistress from a wise woman!
http://urla.ru/1HDY
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> RSS offload types were unified and simplified in DPDK 2.0, easily
> handled with an ifdef though.
>
OVS does not support DPDK 2.0 yet. Is there any reason to introduce
the change at this point?
> Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen
> ---
> lib
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:58:33PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:04:29AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >> There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
> >> "libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it t
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:04:29AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
>> "libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it to "vtep" and includes it in
>> a new "libvtep.la".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ju
On the following pages you will gain a clear understanding of causes of ED and
treatment methods.
http://x.co/7q8rq
&
http://urla.ru/1HCC2
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:40:44AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > I've explained this a lot over the years.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
>> > ---
>> > FAQ.md | 24
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:40:44AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > I've explained this a lot over the years.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > ---
> > FAQ.md | 24
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff
I find it funny that we haven't even got a L3 forwarding
implementation fleshed out enough to merge into the tree, and people
are talking about VOIP to VLAN classification, hw bug workarounds, and
shit like that.
Everyone is really jumping the gun on all of this.
Nobody knows what we will need,
Until now, if both STP and RSTP were enabled, ovs-vswitchd would actually
enable only the one it first noticed to be enabled, and actually turn off
the setting for the other one in the database (!). This doesn't match
ovs-vswitchd behavior for other contradictory configurations, so this
commit cha
Thanks for confirming.
I sent out a patch to make behavior better resemble what ovs-vswitchd
does in other similar situations. Will you look at it? It is here:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-March/052049.html
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Daniele Venturino wrote:
I don't recall if we arrived at a decision about this.
Daniele
2014-11-24 15:02 GMT+01:00 Daniele Venturino :
>
> commit bacdb85ad82f981697245eefb40a3b360cfe379b
>> Author: Alex Wang
>> Date: Tue Jul 15 18:52:19 2014 -0700
>> stp: Make stp-disabled port forward stp bpdu packets.
>> Co
Is this patch still pending?
It doesn't change much, but it clarifies the correlation between
admin_point_to_point_mac
and oper_point_to_point_mac.
Daniele
2014-12-11 20:59 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 03:42:48PM +0100, Daniele Venturino wrote:
> > With this patch, the effect
I'm not sure, but if a user enabled one of them with
*ovs-vsctl set Bridge br0 stp_enable/rstp_enable=true*
and then the other one with
*ovs-vsctl set Bridge br0 rstp_enable/stp_enable=true*
this last command has no effects. See:
static void
> bridge_configure_rstp(struct bridge *br)
> {
>
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 7:30 AM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>
> Commit 6fd6ed71cb9f(ofpbuf: Simplify ofpbuf API.) removed ofpbuf_size
> and ofpbuf_data. They still had reference from netdev-windows. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Thanks for the fix.
Acked-by: Nithin Raju
_
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Acked-by: Nithin Raju
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On 5 March 2015 at 22:03, B Viswanath wrote:
> On 5 March 2015 at 20:22, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 03/05/2015 05:16 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>>
>
> Once the reservation of resources occurs we wouldn't let user space
> arbitrarily write to any table but only tables that have been
>>
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I've explained this a lot over the years.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> FAQ.md | 24
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/FAQ.md b/FAQ.md
> index 5ee529c..fc4161c 100644
> --- a/FAQ.md
> +++ b/FAQ.m
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:54:42AM -0800, Ansis Atteka wrote:
> Until now "ovs-ofctl add-flows ..." command sent each OFPC_ADD
> request one by one accompanied with a barrier request. This
> meant that before ovs-ofctl could send next OFPC_ADD request
> it had to wait for a barrier response that w
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:00:36PM +0100, Daniele Venturino wrote:
> > +STP and RSTP are mutually exclusive. If both are enabled, RSTP
> > +will be used.
>
>
> I think this might not be true.
> If it has not been changed, when STP or RSTP is enabled it should not be
> po
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:04:29AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
> "libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it to "vtep" and includes it in
> a new "libvtep.la".
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
I get a build failure when I apply this:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:30:12AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> Commit 6fd6ed71cb9f(ofpbuf: Simplify ofpbuf API.) removed ofpbuf_size
> and ofpbuf_data. They still had reference from netdev-windows. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:58:52AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
I've explained this a lot over the years.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
FAQ.md | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/FAQ.md b/FAQ.md
index 5ee529c..fc4161c 100644
--- a/FAQ.md
+++ b/FAQ.md
@@ -772,6 +772,30 @@ A: If you add them one at a time with ovs-vsctl
Commit 6fd6ed71cb9f(ofpbuf: Simplify ofpbuf API.) removed ofpbuf_size
and ofpbuf_data. They still had reference from netdev-windows. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
---
lib/netdev-windows.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-windows.c b/l
On 5 March 2015 at 20:22, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 05:16 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>
Once the reservation of resources occurs we wouldn't let user space
arbitrarily write to any table but only tables that have been
explicitly reserved for user space to write to.
>>
[moving to ovs-dev, hope that's OK]
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 03:52:42PM +, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> It looks like there have been no emails for a while.
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/build/
Hmm, looking at travis, there are definitely builds going, and some of
them are failing, so it's
Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
---
include/windows/syslog.h |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/windows/syslog.h b/include/windows/syslog.h
index 3925ed6..242bfc4 100644
--- a/include/windows/syslog.h
+++ b/include/windows/syslog.h
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#define LOG_INFO
On 03/05/2015 05:16 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 03/05/15 07:37, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 03/05/15 02:39, John Fastabend wrote:
Would kernel boot/module options passed to the driver not suffice?
That implies a central authority that decides what these table size
slicing looks like.
The
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Seriously!
Getting laid is simple
All you have to do is read this email...
And then watch this completely free video that shows
you a scientifically-proven mind control trick that gets
women turned on, attracted to you, and wanting to
bang.within seconds.
Click Here To Watch http://h
The original message was received at Thu, 5 Mar 2015 20:33:47 +0700 from
openvswitch.org [51.144.165.240]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
- Transcript of the session follows -
... while talking to server 16.83.4.127:
554 ... Mail quota exceeded
554 ... Ser
On 03/05/15 07:37, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 03/05/15 02:39, John Fastabend wrote:
Would kernel boot/module options passed to the driver not suffice?
That implies a central authority that decides what these table size
slicing looks like.
Once the reservation of resources occurs we wouldn't
On 03/05/15 02:39, John Fastabend wrote:
The intent was to reserve space in the tables for l2, l3, user space,
and whatever else is needed. This reservation needs to come from the
administrator because even the kernel doesn't know how much of my
table space I want to reserve for l2 vs l3 vs tc
Can you get laid using the magic words in this video?
Click Here To Find Out http://urla.ru/1HZ7
This shocking free video shows you how to make any
girl want to fuck you in 60 seconds or less.
Just say the magic words
And any woman is yours.
100% of the time.
Click Here To Watch The Video
Seriously!
Getting laid is simple
All you have to do is read this email...
And then watch this completely free video that shows
you a scientifically-proven mind control trick that gets
women turned on, attracted to you, and wanting to
bang.within seconds.
Click Here To Watch http://u
A bold promise, I know...
But i've recently discovered an absolutely GUARANTEED
method for getting ANY woman into your bed.
FAST
And the best part is, you can use it TONIGHT to get laid.
Click Here To Discover The Secret (Free Video) http://urla.ru/1HSj
<-
Videos comes down to
RSS offload types were unified and simplified in DPDK 2.0, easily
handled with an ifdef though.
Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
index 1ba8310..b095826 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
Thank you very much Ben, your help is appreciated
2015-03-05 2:33 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:21:42PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:06:14AM +0100, Raul Suarez Marin wrote:
> > > Thank you for your fast response. I configured my ovs with
> --enable-W
Do you know how to make any girl horny for you?
This Video Shows You How http://urla.ru/1HZw
Just watch the video, use the tips, and start banging between
5 and 7 girls every week.
If you want to use the tips to get a loyal dedicated girlfriend,
you can use it for that too.
And when you use
There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
"libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it to "vtep" and includes it in
a new "libvtep.la".
Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
---
lib/.gitignore|3 ---
lib/automake.mk | 15 +--
lib/vtep-idl.ann |9 -
vtep/.
Do you think sex may be fun! Try it yourself!
http://hop.kz/9bpR
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
76 matches
Mail list logo
