Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
FAQ.rst | 106 +-
INSTALL.DPDK.rst | 74 +--
INSTALL.Debian.rst| 10 ++---
INSTALL.Docker.rst| 38 +-
INSTALL.KVM.rst | 12
to work?, should it be an appctl to detach or
should we implement some logic two automatically detach the port when it is
removed from ovs?
Thanks,
Mauricio
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Daniele Di Proietto
wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> I was thinking that instead of having a separate
Previous fix was also wrong.
Fixes: 167703d ("doc: Convert INSTALL.DPDK to rST")
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
INSTALL.DPDK.rst | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL.DPDK.rst b/INSTALL.DPDK.rst
index 5780909..4ca9b27 10
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
INSTALL.DPDK.rst | 148 +-
INSTALL.Debian.rst| 20 +--
INSTALL.Docker.rst| 76 +++---
INSTALL.KVM.rst | 24 ++--
INSTALL.Windows.rst | 136
The link was pointing to a wrong place after the file was converted to rst.
Fixes: 167703d664fc ("doc: Convert INSTALL.DPDK to rST")
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
INSTALL.DPDK.rst | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL.
[5]https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/INSTALL.DPDK-ADVANCED.md#52-phy-vm-phy-ivshmem
If you have any other questions don't hesitate in writing them here,
Mauricio Vasquez.
On 10/18/2016 02:43 PM, abhishekb wrote:
Hello,
I'm a student at IIT Bombay pursuing my Masters, I have
On 09/19/2016 10:28 AM, Jeremias Blendin wrote:
Hello Mauricio,
thank you for the pointer to the bin-to-hex conversion, I knew it
looked strange but I could not see why m)
In any case, it was just an example, the actual configuration for
testing is correct.
2016-09-18 18:25 GMT+02:00
y creates pmd threads in sockets where there are ports, in the
case of physical ports the numa node is defined by where the ports are
connected on the server, in the case of dpdkvhostuser ports, it is
defined by where memory of the virtio device is allocated.
Probably in your case physical
://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Mauricio V,
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On 08/12/2016 05:57 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus
It is a necessary fix, specially if hotplug will be introduced.
Acked-by: Mauricio Vásquez B
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib
In some places it is called "external-ids" while in others "external_ids"
is used. This commit changes it to external_ids in all of them.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
ovn/controller/ovn-controller.8.xml | 12 ++--
ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml |
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
README.md | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 69c4912..13a132a 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ b...@openvswitch.org
[INSTALL.KVM.md]:INSTALL.KVM.md
[INSTALL.Libvirt.md
there was not any reference to the DPDK installation in the main README file.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
README.md | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 13a132a..cf53437 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ To use Open
gt; confusing.
> > I was not able to test the patch, it does not apply and I didn't have
> the time
> > to apply it manually.
>
> Thanks for the review Mauricio!
> The latest hotplug patch fails to apply also. Do you plan to submit a new
> version soon? Once you d
-detach
After the user attaches a new device, it has to be added to a bridge
using the add-port command, similarly, before detaching a device,
it has to be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v7:
- rebase to master
v6:
- add explicit comment about supporting
hed", argv[1]);
> goto error;
> }
>
> snprintf(response, sizeof(response),
> - "Port '%s' has been detached", argv[1]);
> + "Device '%s' has been detached", argv[1]);
> +VLOG_INFO("DPDK PCI device %i:%i:%i.%i no longer available",
> + addr.domain, addr.bus,
> + addr.devid, addr.function);
> +
> +/* Remove PCI address from list of available devices */
> +pci_devs[port_id].domain = 0;
> +pci_devs[port_id].bus = 0;
> +pci_devs[port_id].devid = 0;
> +pci_devs[port_id].function = 0;
>
> ovs_mutex_unlock(&dpdk_mutex);
> unixctl_command_reply(conn, response);
> @@ -3387,6 +3472,8 @@ dpdk_init__(const struct smap *ovs_other_config)
> int argc, argc_tmp;
> bool auto_determine = true;
> int err = 0;
> +int i = 0;
> +struct rte_eth_dev_info info;
> cpu_set_t cpuset;
> #ifndef VHOST_CUSE
> char *sock_dir_subcomponent;
> @@ -3509,6 +3596,15 @@ dpdk_init__(const struct smap *ovs_other_config)
>
> atexit(deferred_argv_release);
>
> +memset(pci_devs, 0x0, sizeof(pci_devs));
> +nb_ports = rte_eth_dev_count();
> +for (i = 0; i < nb_ports; i++) {
> +rte_eth_dev_info_get(i, &info);
> +pci_devs[i] = info.pci_dev->addr;
> +VLOG_INFO("DPDK PCI device %i:%i:%i.%i available",
> pci_devs[i].domain,
> + pci_devs[i].bus, pci_devs[i].devid,
> pci_devs[i].function);
> +}
> +
> rte_memzone_dump(stdout);
> rte_eal_init_ret = 0;
>
> --
> 2.4.3
>
>
Mauricio V,
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hello!
We are looking for employees working remotely.
My name is Glenda, am the personnel manager of a large International company.
Most of the work you can do from home, that is, at a distance.
Salary is $2500-$5000.
If you are interested in this offer, please visit
Our Site
Best regards!___
. other_config:dpdk-socket-mem="1024,1024"
Mauricio V,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:25 AM, gowrishankar <
gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2016 08:21 AM, Wang, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi There,
>>
>> I downloaded the master branch from github and tr
.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626897/
Mauricio V,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Jan Scheurich
wrote:
> I very much support the proposal to make configuration of "physical" DPDK
> ports more explicit and flexible. Both the ability to specify the port by
> its PCI
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:42:11PM +0200, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
> > bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Mauricio f
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mauricio for your comments, My comments inline.
>
> >+ it has to be configured with DPDK support and is done by './configure
> --
> >with-dpdk'.
>
sections of all network devices used by DPDK. Parameter
> 'N'
> + determines how many queues can be used by the guest.This may not work
> with
> + old versions of QEMU found in some distros and need Qemu version >= 2.2.
> +
> +## 7. QOS
> +
> +Here is an example on QOS usage.
> +Assuming you have a vhost-user port transmitting traffic consisting of
> +packets of size 64 bytes, the following command would limit the egress
> +transmission rate of the port to ~1,000,000 packets per second
> +
> +`ovs-vsctl set port vhost-user0 qos=@newqos -- --id=@newqos create qos
> +type=egress-policer other-config:cir=4600 other-config:cbs=2048`
> +
> +To examine the QoS configuration of the port:
> +
> +`ovs-appctl -t ovs-vswitchd qos/show vhost-user0`
> +
> +To clear the QoS configuration from the port and ovsdb use the following:
> +
> +`ovs-vsctl destroy QoS vhost-user0 -- clear Port vhost-user0 qos`
> +
> +For more details regarding egress-policer parameters please refer to the
> +vswitch.xml.
> +
> +## 8. Rate Limiting
> +
> +Here is an example on Ingress Policing usage.
> +Assuming you have a vhost-user port receiving traffic consisting of
> +packets of size 64 bytes, the following command would limit the reception
> +rate of the port to ~1,000,000 packets per second:
> +
> +`ovs-vsctl set interface vhost-user0 ingress_policing_rate=368000
> + ingress_policing_burst=1000`
> +
> +To examine the ingress policer configuration of the port:
> +
> +`ovs-vsctl list interface vhost-user0`
> +
> +To clear the ingress policer configuration from the port use the
> following:
> +
> +`ovs-vsctl set interface vhost-user0 ingress_policing_rate=0`
> +
> +For more details regarding ingress-policer see the vswitch.xml.
> +
> +## 9. Static Code Analysis
> +
> +Static Analysis is method of debugging SW by examining the code rather
> than
> +actually executing it. Many third party Software is available to carry
> +Static analysis, few being open source and rest commercial.
> +
> +Below are the steps to run clang static analyzer on OVS codebase.
> +
> + ```
> + apt-get install clang [ On Ubuntu]
> + dnf install clang clang-analyzer -y [ On fedora]
> +
> + cd $OVS_DIR
> + ./boot.sh
> + ./configure --with-dpdk
> + make clean
> + scan-build make CFLAGS="-std=gnu99"
> + scan-view --host= --port 8183
> /tmp/scan-build--mm-dd-114251-1027-1 --allow-all-hosts
> + ```
> +
> + The results can be viewed on the browser using ip address and port no.
> +
> + `http://:8183/`
> +
> +## 10. Vsperf
> +
> +Vsperf project goal is to develop vSwitch test framework that can be used
> to
> +validate the suitability of different vSwitch implementations in a Telco
> deployment
> +environment. More information can be found in below link.
> +
> +https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/VSperf+Home
> +
> +
> +Bug Reporting:
> +--
> +
> +Please report problems to b...@openvswitch.org.
> +
> +
> +[INSTALL.userspace.md]:INSTALL.userspace.md
> +[INSTALL.md]:INSTALL.md
> +[DPDK Linux GSG]:
> http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/linux_gsg/build_dpdk.html#binding-and-unbinding-network-ports-to-from-the-igb-uioor-vfio-modules
> +[DPDK Docs]: http://dpdk.org/doc
> +[libvirt]: http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html
> +[Guest VM using libvirt]: INSTALL.DPDK.md#ovstc
> +[INSTALL DPDK]: INSTALL.DPDK.md#build
> +[INSTALL OVS]: INSTALL.DPDK.md#build
> --
> 2.4.11
>
>
Best Regards,
Mauricio V
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hi Bhanuprakash,
Comments inline.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Bhanuprakash Bodireddy <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> Refactor the INSTALL.DPDK in to two documents named INSTALL.DPDK and
> INSTALL.DPDK-ADVANCED. While INSTALL.DPDK document shall facilitate the
> novice user in se
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 06:48:07PM +0200, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote:
> > when an empty path is given to the --with-dpdk option
> > (--with-dpdk="" or --width-dpdk=$NON_SET_ENV_VARIABLE) the configure
> >
or in that case.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
acinclude.m4 | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
index f3de855..0a14856 100644
--- a/acinclude.m4
+++ b/acinclude.m4
@@ -161,10 +161,11 @@ dnl Configure DPDK source tree
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> >-Original Message-----
> >From: Mauricio Vásquez [mailto:mauriciovasquezber...@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 3:37 PM
> >To: Bodireddy, Bhanupraka
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> >-Original Message-----
> >From: Mauricio Vásquez [mailto:mauriciovasquezber...@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 11:17 AM
> >To: ovs dev
> >Cc:
icit error should be
printed to avoid any possible confusion, as for example when DPDK_BUILD is
not set.
Bhanuprakash, I CC'ed you because you are author of 40b5ea86319f
("acinclude: Autodetect DPDK location when configuring OVS"), then I think
you know ho
gt; supported
> > in this copy of Open vSwitch.*
>
> [RW] This error message means that dpdk-init has not "true" value in db.
>
>
I am not pretty sure that the error message means that, according to my
understanding it means that the dpdk-init is true but ovs was not built
with DPDK support. You can look at the dpdk_init() function in
lib/netdev-nodpdk.c, this is a stub used when there is not DPDK support.
> >
> > Please anyone can help, after executing step 22 getting error "DPDK not
> > supported in this copy of Open vSwitch"
> >
> > Thanks and Regards
> > S Pratap
>
> Br,
> Robert
> ___
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
Mauricio V,
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
h/db.sock:
> connecting...
>
> 2016-06-01T08:25:32Z|4|reconnect|INFO|unix:/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock:
> connected2016-06-01T08:25:32Z|5|dpdk|ERR|DPDK not supported
> in this copy of Open vSwitch.*
>
> Please
Hi Bhanuprakash,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mauricio for the review, my comments inline.
>
>
>
> *From:* Mauricio Vásquez [mailto:mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it]
>
> *Sent:*
Hi,
I just sent v6: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/071786.html
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Mauricio Vásquez <
mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 13,
-detach
After the user attaches a new device, it has to be added to a bridge
using the add-port command, similarly, before detaching a device,
it has to be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
Tested-by: ian.sto...@intel.com
---
v6:
- add explicit comment about
## 6.3 DPDK backend inside VM
> +
> + Please note that additional configuration is required if you want to run
> + ovs-vswitchd with DPDK backend inside a QEMU virtual machine.
> Ovs-vswitchd
> + creates separate DPDK TX queues for each CPU core available. This
> operatio
Hi Bhanuprakash,
Some comments inline.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Bhanuprakash Bodireddy <
bhanuprakash.bodire...@intel.com> wrote:
> Refactor the INSTALL.DPDK in to two documents named INSTALL.DPDK and
> INSTALL.DPDK-ADVANCED. While INSTALL.DPDK document shall facilitate the
> novice use
Thanks Ilya for your answer,
I'll try to give a look to your patch-set this week.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Ilya Maximets
wrote:
> Hi, Mauricio.
>
> My thoughts about TX queue management described in patch-set
> "[PATCH RFC 0/6] dpif-netdev: Manual pinnig of RX q
the
system. I think it is not common to have all cpu cores are assigned to ovs,
then many of those queues will be not used.
Does it make sense to create the number of tx queues based on the
core_mask, in a way that all of the queues are actually used?
Thank you very much for the attention,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:25:41PM +0200, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote:
> > In order to use dpdk ports in ovs they have to be bound to a DPDK
> > compatible driver before ovs is started.
> >
> > This patch adds the
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mauricio Vasquez B
> > [mailto:mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it]
> > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 9:26 PM
> > To: dev@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: acon...@red
Hello,
I sent v5: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/070953.html
Mauricio V,
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Mauricio Vásquez <
mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it> wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
>>
-detach
After the user attaches a new device, it has to be added to a bridge
using the add-port command, similarly, before detaching a device,
it has to be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v5:
- use two appctl commands instead of a single one
- rebase to
Hi Flavio,
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Thanks for this patch, Mauricio.
> More inline.
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 09:47:12PM +0200, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Adding in CC all the people involved.
> > (I don't know why git just t
Adding in CC all the people involved.
(I don't know why git just takes two)
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Mauricio Vasquez B <
mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it> wrote:
> In order to use dpdk ports in ovs they have to be bound to a DPDK
> compatible driver befo
Hi Markos,
I sent a new version:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/070795.html
Thank you for your feedback.
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (a couple of minor things I noticed whilst looking at your patch)
> On 04/13/2016 03:08
device, it has to be added to a bridge
using the add-port command, similarly, before detaching a device
it has to be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v4:
- fix typo in commit message
- remove unnecessary whitespace change in INSTALL.DPDK.md
v3:
- create
Sent from my Samsung device
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Unfortunately I am not able to give you a more precise help in this case.
As this problem is not directly related to OvS, I recommend you to write to
the DPDK mailing list, hopefully someone will help you.
Best Regards,
Mauricio Vasquez,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, lifuqiong
wrote:
>
) application to test
your card.
Once again, please let me know the results.
Mauricio Vasquez,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:01 PM, lifuqiong wrote:
> Hi Mauricio Vasquez:
>
> Thank you for your good advice.
>
> I changed my environment as you metioned, And try to ping from VM to
ters,
Please let me know the results of that test.
Mauricio Vasquez,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:30 AM, lifuqiong wrote:
> Hi Mauricio Vasquez:
>
>
>
> root@host52:~# ovs-vsctl show
>
> f2664a74-7523-4240-812a-4f022051346a
>
> Bridge "ovsbr0"
>
>
Hi lifuqiong,
Could you provide the output of the following commands in your setup?:
ovs-vsctl show
ovs-ofctl dump-flows
ovs-ofctl dump-ports
Mauricio Vasquez,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:23 AM, lifuqiong
wrote:
> Hi Mauricio:
>
> I changed my qemu version from 2.2.1 to 2.5.
Now it is clear for me,
Thanks Ben.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > I would like to know how is the methodology to back-port bug fixes in
> ovs,
> > I ask it because with [1] I notice
advance
Mauricio Vasquez,
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
.tar.gz, please download
ovs from git and switch to branch-2.5.
Mauricio Vasquez,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:28 AM, lifuqiong wrote:
> I want to test dpdk vhost-user port on ovs to follow
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2015/06/09/building-vhost-user-for-ovs-today-using-dpdk-200
> ;
&
device, it has to be added to a bridge
using the to use the add-port command, similarly, before detaching a
device, it has to be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
INSTALL.DPDK.md | 26 +-
NEWS | 1 +
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 102
Hello Li,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Li Wei wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 03/28/2016 04:52 PM, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote:
> > In order to use dpdk ports in ovs they have to be bound to a DPDK
> > compatible driver before ovs is started.
> >
> > This patc
device, it has to be added to a bridge
using the to use the add-port command, similarly, before detaching a
device, it has to be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
INSTALL.DPDK.md | 26 +++-
NEWS | 1 +
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 88
Hi Ian,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> This patch is quite useful. Some minor comments inline. I've also tested
> the patch and can confirm it works without issue.
>
Great!
>
> Thanks
> Ian
>
> > -Original
Right, I'll wait for a review and then I'll send a V2 with all the patches
in one.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Mar 28, 2016, at 1:52 AM, Mauricio Vasquez B <
> mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it> wrote:
> >
>
I sent a proper patch:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-March/068600.html
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Mauricio Vásquez <
mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it> wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> First of all thank you very much for your feedback.
>
> I didn't
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
NEWS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index ea7f3a1..2ba8659 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Post-v2.5.0
assignment.
* Type of log messages from PMD threads changed from INFO to DBG.
* QoS
device, it has to be added to a bridge
using the to use the add-port command, similarly, before detaching a
device, it has to be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 73 +++
1 file
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
INSTALL.DPDK.md | 26 +-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL.DPDK.md b/INSTALL.DPDK.md
index 9ec8bf6..4095402 100644
--- a/INSTALL.DPDK.md
+++ b/INSTALL.DPDK.md
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Using the DPDK with
n vhost-cuse support in OVS.
>
> Fixes: 585a5beaa2a4 ("netdev-dpdk: vhost-user: Fix sending packets to
> queues not enabled by guest.")
> Reported-by: Mauricio Vasquez B >
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
Thanks you very much for the fix Il
Chandras wrote:
> On 03/24/2016 02:32 PM, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Hi Markos,
> >
> > Currently DPDK 2.2.0 is required to build OVS master, DPDK 2.2.0 still
> > requires setting the CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS option.
> >
> > I think we need to wait
Hi Markos,
Currently DPDK 2.2.0 is required to build OVS master, DPDK 2.2.0 still
requires setting the CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS option.
I think we need to wait until we move to a new DPDK version to change the
documentation.
Mauricio V,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Markos Chandras
6 at 11:42 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> Mauricio Vasquez B writes:
>
> > In order to use dpdk ports in ovs they have to be bound to a DPDK
> > compatible driver before ovs is started.
> >
> > This patch adds the possibility to hotplug (or hot-u
, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ilya Maximets
wrote:
> On 23.03.2016 12:19, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Hi IIya,
> >
> > I'm using DPDK 2.2.0 and QEMU 2.2.1.
>
> You should use QEMU 2.5.
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Ilya Maximets <mailto:i.ma
Hi IIya,
I'm using DPDK 2.2.0 and QEMU 2.2.1.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Ilya Maximets
wrote:
> What version of DPDK and QEMU you're using with OVS 2.5?
>
> On 23.03.2016 12:11, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am testing a setup wh
Somebody wants to have at look at this?
Thanks,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Mauricio Vasquez B <
mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it> wrote:
> In order to use dpdk ports in ovs they have to be bound to a DPDK
> compatible driver before ovs is started.
>
> T
br0 (tap)
port 3: vhost-user-2 (dpdkvhostuser: configured_rx_queues=1,
configured_tx_queues=1, requested_rx_queues=1, requested_tx_queues=9)
ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show
pmd thread numa_id 0 core_id 0:
port: vhost-user-1 queue-id: 0
port: vhost-user-2 queue-id: 0
Thank you very much,
Mauricio V
the user attaches a new device, it can use the add-port command
to use it in a switch, similarly, before detaching a device, it has to
be removed using the del-port command.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 79 +++
1
The patch mentioned in the commit e73b7508fb58 ("INSTALL.DPDK: Mention
issue with QEMU v2.4.0 & dpdkvhostuser") is present in DPDK v2.2.0,
then this issue is not valid anymore.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
INSTALL.DPDK.md | 12
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
wrote:
> Apologies for the delay in the review.
>
> I think this and the previous patch could benefit from using str_to_uint().
>
> Would you mind making that change and resubmitting? I'll be happy to apply
> it then.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniele
>
> On 25/01/20
Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
error handling, port names as "dpdkr" and "dpdkr1x" are considered valid.
With this patch only positive port numbers in decimal notation are considered
valid.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v
Current implementation of the ring_client test only supports until the
dpdkr255 port, this patch extends it to support the full range of possible
dpdkr ports.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v3:
use str_to_uint
tests/dpdk/ring_client.c | 46
Dear All,
I think this change should be announce in the NEWS file, Shouldn't it?
Thanks,
On 25 January 2016 at 21:53, Daniele Di Proietto
wrote:
> Apologies for the delay.
>
> I applied this to master and branch-2.5 with the following incremental,
> to remove a deprecation warning:
>
> diff --
Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
error handling, port names as "dpdkr", "dpdkr1x", "dpdkr 5" are considered
valid.
With this path only positive port numbers in decimal notation are considered
valid.
Signed-off-by: Maurici
Current implementation of the ring_client test only supports up to the
dpdkr255 port, this patch extends it to support the full range of possible
dpdkr ports.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v2:
- replace strtol by strtoul
Thanks to Aaron Conole!
tests/dpdk/ring_client.c | 44
On 25 January 2016 at 10:42, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Mauricio Vasquez B writes:
>
> > Current implementation allows to support only until the dpdkr255 port,
> > this patch extends it to support the full range of possible dpdkr ports.
>
> I think this commit message is not
Hello Aaron,
On 25 January 2016 at 10:28, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Mauricio Vasquez B writes:
>
> > Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
> > error handling, port names as "dpdkr" or "dpdkr1x" are considered valid.
>
>
I sent this patch as part of a patch series:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-January/064968.html.
Thank you very much.
On 15 January 2016 at 10:17, Traynor, Kevin wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mauricio Vásquez [mailto:mauricio.vasquezber...@stu
Current implementation allows to support only until the dpdkr255 port,
this patch extends it to support the full range of possible dpdkr ports.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
tests/dpdk/ring_client.c | 43 ++-
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17
Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
error handling, port names as "dpdkr" or "dpdkr1x" are considered valid.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deleti
A ring name length of 10 characters is not enough for dpdkr ports
starting from dpdkr10, then it is increased to RTE_RING_NAMESIZE
characters.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio
>> Vasquez
>> B
>> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 6:28 PM
>> To: dev@openvswitch.org
>> Cc: acon...@bytheb.org
>> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] lib/netdev-dpdk: increase ring name length
>&g
Dear Aaron,
I completely agree with you, I've sent a second version:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-January/064228.html
Thank you very much,
Mauricio Vasquez B
On 10 January 2016 at 12:17, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Greetings Mauricio,
>
> Mauricio Vasquez B writes:
&
A ring name length of 10 characters is not enough for dpdkr ports
starting from dpdkr10, then it is increased to RTE_RING_NAMESIZE
characters.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v2:
- Use RTE_RING_NAMESIZE instead of a numerical constant.
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3
A ring name length of 10 characters is not enough for dpdkr ports
starting from dpdkr10, then it is increased to 20 characters.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
Hello Furong,
Unfortunately it is not well documented, I'm going to explain what you need
to start:
- The ivshmem mechanism of DPDK does not work with a standard version of
QEMU, then you need a patched version. It could be found at the dpdk-ovs
project: https://github.com/01org/dpdk-ovs.
You can
December 2015 at 09:20, Mauricio Vásquez <
mauricio.vasquezber...@studenti.polito.it> wrote:
> I updated to the last git version and then applied your patch. The issue
> is still present.
>
> The ovs log still shows the message
> "2015-12-31T14:18:04Z|1|dpif_netdev(pmd
e.
> Please try my new patch "[PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Rework of rx queue
> management."
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-December/063920.html
>
> May be it will help.
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>
> On 30.12.2015 18:25, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> &
pmd_thread *pmd;
> -
> -CMAP_FOR_EACH (pmd, node, &dp->poll_threads) {
> -dp_netdev_reload_pmd__(pmd);
> -}
> +dp_netdev_destroy_all_pmds(dp);
> +dp_netdev_set_nonpmd(dp);
> +dp_netdev_reset_pmd_threads(dp);
> }
>
> static uint32_t
> ---
>
> I'll try to
packet: 18642.59 (37229257/1997)
avg processing cycles per packet: 15023.85 (30002635/1997)
Other threads continue to show a high number of miss packets, throughput is
still 700 kpps.
On 30 December 2015 at 09:36, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 30.12.2015 17:32, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
&g
I just checked and the traffic is generated after everything is already set
up, ports and flows.
On 30 December 2015 at 08:50, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> The transmission starts before the addition of dpdkr4 to ovs?
>
> On 30.12.2015 16:31, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Dear Il
08:05, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 30.12.2015 15:51, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Hello Ilya,
> >
> > The dpdkr ports involved have just one TX queue, so it should not be the
> reason in this case.
> >
>
> Please, provide output of:
> ovs-appctl dpif-netde
eues. That's why most of pmd threads can't install a ukey
> and always executes a misses instead of emc hits.
>
> Fix your 'Source'.
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>
> On 29.12.2015 22:19, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Hello to all,
> >
>
Hello to all,
I am performing some performance testing using OVS with DPDK and I am
having some issues when I change the number of PMD cores that ovs uses.
The testing architecture consists of a source and sink processes, the
source allocates some packets from the memory pool at the beginning and
Dear Aaron,
The general idea looks good to me.
Just some comments inline
On 3 December 2015 at 05:23, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Existing DPDK integration is provided by use of command line options which
> must be split out and passed to librte in a special manner. However, this
> forces any confi
Dear Ben,
You are right, now it works.
Thank you very much!
On 20 November 2015 at 18:48, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:39:37PM +0100, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > according to [1] by default ovs inserts some hidden flows that can create
> >
ng?
When I do not use the DPDK datapath, everything works fine and with the
previous commands I am able to remove the hidden flows.
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Mauricio V,
Ivano C,
[1] http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-March/017029.html
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
