[jira] Closed: (OWB-230) Enable/Disable Configuration of JSF2 Extensions

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gurkan Erdogdu closed OWB-230. -- Resolution: Fixed > Enable/Disable Configuration of JSF2 Extensions >

[jira] Created: (OWB-230) Enable/Disable Configuration of JSF2 Extensions

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA)
Enable/Disable Configuration of JSF2 Extensions --- Key: OWB-230 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-230 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: New Feature Components: Context and S

Re: Procedure for generating Javadoc and User Guide

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
do you run maven from the commandline or from an IDE? Maybe the 'offline' mode is activated somehow? Another option: do you have true in one of your settings.xml or defined as property? LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, David Ezzio wrote: > From: David Ezzio > Subject: Re: Procedure for ge

Re: Procedure for generating Javadoc and User Guide

2010-01-12 Thread David Ezzio
Hi Jean-Louis, I am not behind a corporate firewall. For that reason, I don't know why I would require a proxy. And if I did, I have no idea what proxy it would be. Any other ideas? David Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: Hi, As suggested by Matthias, did you get a try adding -Dhttp.proxyHost=

Re: svn commit: r898454 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/plugin/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/scopes/ java/org/apache/webbea

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
cool stuff, works for me :-) jetty:run @Named @ViewScoped public class Awesome {...} On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > btw, props also goes out to Martin Marinschek and Jakob Korherr. They helped > me yesterday evening to implement the JSF eventing stuff while having a be

Re: [orga] commits email (kinda) wrong

2010-01-12 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jan 12, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hello, > > when replying to a commit email, it uses this INVALID email address > > openwebbeans-...@openwebbeans.apache.org > > It is dev@openwebbeans.apache.org instead; > Does one where to change that ? Infra needs to do that. Looks

Re: svn commit: r898454 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/plugin/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/scopes/ java/org/apache/webbea

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
btw, props also goes out to Martin Marinschek and Jakob Korherr. They helped me yesterday evening to implement the JSF eventing stuff while having a beer together ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Mark Struberg wrote: > From: Mark Struberg > Subject: Re: svn commit: r898454 - in > /ope

Re: svn commit: r898454 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/plugin/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/scopes/ java/org/apache/webbea

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
soon... some meetings now... :-) On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > nice! looking forward to get feedback or bug reports ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> From: Matthias Wessendorf >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r898454 - in >> /

Re: svn commit: r898454 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/plugin/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/scopes/ java/org/apache/webbea

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
nice! looking forward to get feedback or bug reports ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > From: Matthias Wessendorf > Subject: Re: svn commit: r898454 - in > /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/ > java/org/apache/webbeans/js

Re: Procedure for generating Javadoc and User Guide

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
2010/1/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > Hi, > > As suggested by Matthias, did you get a try adding -Dhttp.proxyHost= > -Dhttp.proxyPort= ? > It should solve your problem. that's lame; it should go for the global proxy ;-) > > JLouis > > 2010/1/12 David Ezzio > >> Hi Gurkan and Jean-Louis, >> >> After

[orga] commits email (kinda) wrong

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hello, when replying to a commit email, it uses this INVALID email address openwebbeans-...@openwebbeans.apache.org It is dev@openwebbeans.apache.org instead; Does one where to change that ? -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.

Re: svn commit: r898454 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/plugin/ java/org/apache/webbeans/jsf/scopes/ java/org/apache/webbea

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
great. will check out now; ...and demonstrate that next week, on my JSF 2 talk :-) On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:20 PM, wrote: > Author: struberg > Date: Tue Jan 12 18:20:42 2010 > New Revision: 898454 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=898454&view=rev > Log: > OWB-229 support for the new JS

Re: Procedure for generating Javadoc and User Guide

2010-01-12 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi, As suggested by Matthias, did you get a try adding -Dhttp.proxyHost= -Dhttp.proxyPort= ? It should solve your problem. JLouis 2010/1/12 David Ezzio > Hi Gurkan and Jean-Louis, > > After updating to latest, and clearing out my docbook entries in my local > repository, I was able to get the

[jira] Resolved: (OWB-229) add support for the JSF2 javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped annotation

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved OWB-229. --- Resolution: Fixed > add support for the JSF2 javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped annotation > --

[jira] Created: (OWB-229) add support for the JSF2 javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped annotation

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
add support for the JSF2 javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped annotation --- Key: OWB-229 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-229 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] Resolved: (OWB-224) we need to destroy() our Contextual instances on a Conversation timeout

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved OWB-224. --- Resolution: Fixed > we need to destroy() our Contextual instances on a Conversation timeout > --

[jira] Resolved: (OWB-228) move faces-config from webbeans-impl to webbeans-jsf module

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved OWB-228. --- Resolution: Fixed > move faces-config from webbeans-impl to webbeans-jsf module > --

[jira] Created: (OWB-228) move faces-config from webbeans-impl to webbeans-jsf module

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
move faces-config from webbeans-impl to webbeans-jsf module --- Key: OWB-228 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-228 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Affects Version

Re: Error in openwebbeans-default.properties

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
done, txs 4 reporting David! LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, David Ezzio wrote: > From: David Ezzio > Subject: Error in openwebbeans-default.properties > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:16 PM > In webbeans-impl, the default > properties file appears to

Re: Error in openwebbeans-default.properties

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
yes, you are right, I'll change this. txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, David Ezzio wrote: > From: David Ezzio > Subject: Error in openwebbeans-default.properties > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:16 PM > In webbeans-impl, the default > properties

Error in openwebbeans-default.properties

2010-01-12 Thread David Ezzio
In webbeans-impl, the default properties file appears to have an error. It has: #Lifecycle to start container org.apache.webbeans.spi.lifecycle.Lifecycle=org.apache.webbeans.lifecycle.EnterpriseLifeCycle Shouldn't the key be org.apache.webbeans.spi.Lifecycle ? David

[jira] Created: (OWB-227) handle errors set via AfterBeanDiscovery#addDefinitionError

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
handle errors set via AfterBeanDiscovery#addDefinitionError --- Key: OWB-227 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-227 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Affects Version

Re: Procedure for generating Javadoc and User Guide

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
DAvid, I think you are behind a firewall; I noticed some timeouts behind mine; Not sure if the generator plugin is actually checking for the global proxy settings. -Matt On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, David Ezzio wrote: > Hi Gurkan and Jean-Louis, > > After updating to latest, and clearing ou

[jira] Resolved: (OWB-226) create a way to dynamically add Extensions to our tests

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved OWB-226. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: M3) M4 > create a way to dynamicall

Re: Procedure for generating Javadoc and User Guide

2010-01-12 Thread David Ezzio
Hi Gurkan and Jean-Louis, After updating to latest, and clearing out my docbook entries in my local repository, I was able to get the following to work in webbeans-doc. mvn docbkx:generate-pdf However, the generation of html, which follows when invoking with clean compile, failed with the fo

[jira] Created: (OWB-226) create a way to dynamically add Extensions to our tests

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
create a way to dynamically add Extensions to our tests --- Key: OWB-226 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-226 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: New Feature Component

Re: DocBook issue

2010-01-12 Thread Veselin Kovacevic
I apologize to everyone for the previous mail. Just I'm not recognized that mail is sent to dev list. 2010/1/12 Gurkan Erdogdu > Hi Jean > > You can continue to work on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-183 > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > 2010/1/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > > I know that. >

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Mark Maybe words are not enough for technical discussions :) My advice is that for the time being, instead of creating api/impl/extensions new projects, you could implement those JSF things in webbeans-jsf folder. After that we could look at implementation and I believe that we can decide more r

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > oki, I'll try to explain again: > >> cdi-jsf2-api > > I'm _NOT_ going to implement some JSF api. > Maybe we should name this jsf2-extensions-api? Please make a suggestion. > > What do I like to put into that module: > > Although there is a Fl

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
oki, I'll try to explain again: > cdi-jsf2-api I'm _NOT_ going to implement some JSF api. Maybe we should name this jsf2-extensions-api? Please make a suggestion. What do I like to put into that module: Although there is a FlashScope defined in the spec, and this is _very_ usefull, there is _

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
>>>well, he didn't say that this package contains the full JSF API... I mean that any subset of JSF API. 2010/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > At the time OWB picks up the extension, we will try to add the > > javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: At the time OWB picks up the extension, we will try to add the > javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped.class and the corresponding Context to the > BeanManager >>>-> kawumms, because the ViewScoped.class is not available in > JSF-1.2 > Maybe I did n

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
>>>At the time OWB picks up the extension, we will try to add the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped.class and the corresponding Context to the BeanManager >>>-> kawumms, because the ViewScoped.class is not available in JSF-1.2 Maybe I did not explain it better, but OWB uses JSF2 not JSF 1.2. Look at "tru

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > in theory yes, in praxis no ;) > > At the time OWB picks up the extension, we will try to add the > javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped.class and the corresponding Context to the > BeanManager -> kawumms, because the ViewScoped.class is not availab

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
in theory yes, in praxis no ;) At the time OWB picks up the extension, we will try to add the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped.class and the corresponding Context to the BeanManager -> kawumms, because the ViewScoped.class is not available in JSF-1.2 Thus, I really hesitate to check it in :( I also

Re: renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?)

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
>>>The structure is fine as it is. +1 and Option 3 :) 2010/1/12 Mark Struberg > Actually I meant the artifactId in pom.xml ;) > > openwebbeans-jsf > > The structure is fine as it is. It's solely about our strategy to support > both JSF-1 and JFS-2 apps. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Tue, 1/12/

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
>>>This also has the side effect that we now for the first time really use JSF2 functionality, and thus it would not be possible to use OWB with JSF-1 >>>applications anymore Actually this is not correct observation. OWB does not depend on any JSF specific implementations. And you know that core O

Re: FYI: Markmail

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Thanks! --Gurkan 2010/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf > http://markmail.org/list/org.apache.openwebbeans.dev > > -Matthias > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > --

Re: DocBook issue

2010-01-12 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi Jean You can continue to work on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-183 Thanks; --Gurkan 2010/1/12 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > I know that. > Actually, we generate HTML Single and Multi and PDF. > The PDF rendering using FOP takes some time. > > I'm used to only generate HTML single page

Re: renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?)

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Actually I meant the artifactId in pom.xml ;) > > openwebbeans-jsf > > The structure is fine as it is. It's solely about our strategy to support > both JSF-1 and JFS-2 apps. yeah, I got that. However not sure I really like the structure as

Re: renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?)

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
Actually I meant the artifactId in pom.xml ;) openwebbeans-jsf The structure is fine as it is. It's solely about our strategy to support both JSF-1 and JFS-2 apps. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > From: Matthias Wessendorf > Subject: renaming of the modules (

FYI: Markmail

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
http://markmail.org/list/org.apache.openwebbeans.dev -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?)

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped handling and it turned out that >> I do not need anything OWB special. So this i a completely CDI independent >>portable

Re: fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped handling and it turned out that > I do not need anything OWB special. So this i a completely CDI independent >portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour to _not_ add it to >openw

fully going JSF2?

2010-01-12 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi! I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped handling and it turned out that I do not need anything OWB special. So this i a completely CDI independent portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour to _not_ add it to openwebbeans-jsf but to a new 'extensions' module. This also has the

Re: DocBook issue

2010-01-12 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
I know that. Actually, we generate HTML Single and Multi and PDF. The PDF rendering using FOP takes some time. I'm used to only generate HTML single page in my continuous build platform (Hudson). HTML multi and PDF are only generated during assembly/delivery. I gonna checkout the latests version